Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Antibody In Blood Test Mean Sensitivity?


olymatt

Recommended Posts

olymatt Newbie

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I wish labs wouldn't just 'skip' tests but oh well I guess they have their reasons. I can't really answer your question with any certainty especially with the known high rate of false negatives. I would suggest though that you give the diet a good strict try after you are done with testing. No matter what the test results are a trial of the diet should be done if symptoms suggest gluten intolerance or celiac.

olymatt Newbie

I wish labs wouldn't just 'skip' tests but oh well I guess they have their reasons. I can't really answer your question with any certainty especially with the known high rate of false negatives. I would suggest though that you give the diet a good strict try after you are done with testing. No matter what the test results are a trial of the diet should be done if symptoms suggest gluten intolerance or celiac.

But do you know if the lower level of IGA ( the < 3) would suggest a sensitivity? I mean, would I expect to find a 0 if I had no sensitivity at all?

SGWhiskers Collaborator

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew

I'm unsure what a test result of greater than 3 means. Did you make a typo that should have said less than 3? According to your test range, any result less than 8 would be negative. If you have a 3, that means you are negative and does not mean you have a little sensitivity.

With that said, there are a huge number of posters on this site who have found relief from the gluten-free diet dispite negative blood work. Even though your results are negative, I highly suggest you try a strict 3 month trial on the diet. You can continue to look for other reasons for your symptoms with your doctor, but you may find that the gluten-free diet works.

Medicine has learned a lot about celiac disease, but there is still more to learn. Right now, only a few genes are tested for celiac disease. Within the past year, scientists identified about another dozen that trigger celiac. There are people who have negative blood work, but positive endoscopies. The people who test negative for celiac, but respond well to the gluten-free diet are considered gluten intolerant. It is possible that this is celiac disease that medicine has not learned how to identify yet. It is also possible that this is another similar disease. Either way, if you have enough symptoms to have led you to celiac testing, don't stop the investigation of your illness just because of a negative test result. The 3 month gluten-free trial should be your next step along with exploring other causes for your symptoms with your doctor.

Hope you are feeling better soon.

Skylark Collaborator

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew

The second test that has you confused is for total IgA. It determines whether you make normal amounts of IgA so the TTG test is valid. Low IgA is also a risk factor for celiac. You have a completely normal result there. That is why Quest skipped the IgG test.

On the TTG, <3 is simply a negative result. These types of tests tend to have a little background noise so zero readings are somewhat uncommon.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,168
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Elfriede Smith
    Newest Member
    Elfriede Smith
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Have you considered the possibility that you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) rather than celiac disease? They share many of the same symptoms, the difference being that NCGS does not damage the lining of the small bowel. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. There is no test yet available for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. In view of your genetic profile, I would give it consideration.
    • Kj44
    • mariamccl
      Hi, 25f who recently had a endoscopy procedure to diagnose celiac disease. Mum and uncle are both diagnosed celiacs. I've had symptoms over the past year - headaches that have become debilitating and frequent, feeling faint and nauseous with high heart rate, diarrhea and constipation, anemia, and recently my periods have become almost non existent. My doctor sent me a letter yesterday saying this " biopsies from the duodenum show some very mild features that could be in keeping with celiac disease but also could be due to other causes". I am waiting on an appointment to see him in the clinic to discuss this but in the meantime I wanted to check if anyone else has experienced this? I was eating plenty of gluten before my camera test and for the past 2 weeks have completely cut it out of my diet and I'm seeing changes in my bowel movements for the first time in my life! Headaches, dizziness etc are still there but maybe it takes longer for them to go away? Any help would be so appreciated -  I feel so lost in this whole process!! 
    • trents
      Did your symptoms improve after going on a gluten-free diet?
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your genetic test results and background. Your results indicate you carry one half of the DQ2 heterodimer (DQA1*05), which is associated with a very low celiac disease risk (0.05%). While most celiac patients have either DQ2 or DQ8, these genes are also present in people without celiac disease, so the test alone doesn’t confirm a diagnosis. Since you’ve been gluten-free for 10 years, traditional diagnostic methods (like endoscopy or blood tests) would not be reliable now. If an official diagnosis is important to you, consider discussing a gluten challenge with your doctor, where you reintroduce gluten for a period before testing. Alternatively, you could focus on symptom management and dietary adherence, as your gluten-free diet seems to be helping. Consulting a gastroenterologist or celiac specialist could provide further clarity.  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
×
×
  • Create New...