Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Watch Out For The 'beef' At Taco Bell


mushroom

Recommended Posts

mushroom Proficient

It would appear that Taco Bell have been using a few unadvertised ingredients in its 'beef'. I don't know if any of our posters eat at Taco Bell, but they should probably read this:

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Cypressmyst Explorer

Disgusting. Not that I have eaten there in ages anyway well before going gluten-free but...yuck. :blink:

Thanks for posting!

Takala Enthusiast

Taco Bell "beef" filling, 36% "beef," and 64% other stuff:

Water

* Isolated oat product (didn't grandma used to call this - fiber ? :P )

Salt

Chili pepper

Onion powder

Tomato powder

*Oats (wheat)

Soy lecithin

Sugar

Spices

*Maltodextrin (a polysaccharide that is absorbed as glucose)

Soybean oil (anti-dusting agent)

Garlic powder

*Autolyzed yeast extract

Citric acid, caramel color

Cocoa powder

Silicon dioxide (anti-caking agent)

*Natural flavors

Yeast

*Modified corn starch

Natural smoke flavor

Salt

Sodium phosphate

Less than 2% of beef broth

Potassium phosphate

Potassium lactate

______

No quiero Taco Sell !

____________

edited 1/26/11 to add that the 36% - 64% meat to "other" ingredient ratio claim, came from stories in many media outlets including the Huffington Post, ABC world news, Gizmodo, etc, based on the class action lawsuit filed by an Alabama law firm, Blood Hurst & O' Reardon, LLP, San Diego, CA, which says the USDA requires at least 40% meat for anything being sold as "meat filling," but Taco Bell is calling the filling "beef" in its advertising.

quote: "In reality, a substantial majority of the filling is comprised of substances other than beef, and is required to be labeled and advertised as "Taco Meat Filling." "Taco meat filling is not Beef." "This action seeks to require Taco Bell to properly advertise and label these food items and to engage in corrective advertising... "

Amanda Obney, plaintiff, vs. Taco Bell Corporation, defendant

kareng Grand Master

My boys have friends that LOVE TB. They want to like it, too. But they both hate it! I make better tacos and quesidillas at home.

Juliebove Rising Star

I have long known this. I think if you had to eat there, the only safe things are the beans and rice. Golden Corral also uses wheat in their taco meat.

modiddly16 Enthusiast

If anyone is shocked by the lack of real beef in their meat, they should probably get out more!! :D

larry mac Enthusiast

I'm curious where the 36/64% came from. That's not information that is disclosed on the packaging. Ingredients by law are listed in order by weight. The second largest ingredient is water, which is very heavy in comparison with the non-meat ingredients.

I suspect someone just made up those percentages. There are many food products that use TVP as an extender. Nobody's making a fuss about that.

Come on people, what do you expect for a buck?

best regards, lm


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

From the Huffington post:

Attorney Dee Miles said attorneys had Taco Bell's "meat mixture" tested and found it contained less that 35 percent beef.

Open Original Shared Link

larry mac Enthusiast

The FIRST people I would mistrust would be lawyers! It's their job to lie for their clients. :D

The second people I would mistrust would be small independent labs. I can't look that link up right now (I'm on a work computer), so I don't know which lab was used. But I have a story.

I worked at Core Labs, an international gas & oil service company with labs all over the world. One of my duties was to go on location where someone had blown themselves up lighting their furnace and collect samples of propane from their actual tank. This is always done under the watchful eyes of lawyers representing the family and the lawyers representing the gas company (that is being sued by the family). The plaintiffs always claim there was no odorant in the propane, and therefore no warning smell that would have alerted the person blown up that he should not light the furnace. By law, a certain amount of a horrible smelling chemical (methyl mercaptan) must be added to the propane, which is odorless.

What actually happens though, the person does smell the odorant, but doesn't recognize the hazard. Anyway, the plaintiffs lawyers get some tiny lab to analize the samples and always say there is no odorant. We would analize the same samples and there would indeed be odorant. Being the one that did the analysis, I can personally attest to that. We had no reason to lie. I made the same money one way or the other, and whatever the results were, that's what they were.

That's why I'm interested in finding out more about that analysis. I'm thinking a lot of that percentage is water. That would be misleading.

best regards, lm

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Howlin at the Moon
    Newest Member
    Howlin at the Moon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @marinke! "Type 1a diabetes (DM1) is associated with an increased risk of celiac disease (celiac disease) (1)." from: https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/35/10/2083/38503/IgA-Anti-transglutaminase-Autoantibodies-at-Type-1 "The prevalence of celiac disease (celiac disease) in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is 5.1%, and it is often asymptomatic (1)." from: https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/48/2/e13/157637/Diagnostic-Outcomes-of-Elevated-Transglutaminase So, this is 5x the rate found in the general population.
    • Mari
      Hi James47, You are less than 2 years into your recovery from Celiacs.  Tell us more about the problems you are having. Do you just want to get rid of belly fat or are you still having symptoms like gas and bloating.    For symptoms you may need to change your diet and take various supplements that you cannot adsorb from the foods you eat because of the damage caused by the autoimmune reaction in your small intestine. 
    • marinke
      My daughter (4 years old) has type 1 diabetes since she was 1. Therefore, every year a screening is done. We live in the Netherlands. Every year the screening was fine. This year here ttg is positive, 14, >7 is positive. IGA was in range. Could the diabetes cause this positive result? Or the fact that she was sick the weeks before the brood test?
    • Baz
      @DayaInTheSun what were the shortness of breath symptoms for you ? And did they come on all of a sudden or was it a gradual increase in said symptoms?
    • DayaInTheSun
      I had shortness of breath so much so I went to a lung doctor. I told him I get short of breath wirh certain foods, he said “Food doesn’t affect hour breathing.” I told him maybe it was an allergy  he cut me off then said “Food allergies don’t cause shortness of breathe.” I beg to differ as soon as I figured out what foods were causing my shortness of breath it went away. I also never saw him again as he was rude, condescending? And refuse to listen to me kept dismissing my problems as “you’re young.” I cut out Soy, dairy, sesame, eggs, and of course gluten. I stopped being short of breath, going on a two years now. No thanks to the doctor I saw. Figured it out on my own.   
×
×
  • Create New...