Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Watch Out For The 'beef' At Taco Bell


mushroom

Recommended Posts

mushroom Proficient

It would appear that Taco Bell have been using a few unadvertised ingredients in its 'beef'. I don't know if any of our posters eat at Taco Bell, but they should probably read this:

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Cypressmyst Explorer

Disgusting. Not that I have eaten there in ages anyway well before going gluten-free but...yuck. :blink:

Thanks for posting!

Takala Enthusiast

Taco Bell "beef" filling, 36% "beef," and 64% other stuff:

Water

* Isolated oat product (didn't grandma used to call this - fiber ? :P )

Salt

Chili pepper

Onion powder

Tomato powder

*Oats (wheat)

Soy lecithin

Sugar

Spices

*Maltodextrin (a polysaccharide that is absorbed as glucose)

Soybean oil (anti-dusting agent)

Garlic powder

*Autolyzed yeast extract

Citric acid, caramel color

Cocoa powder

Silicon dioxide (anti-caking agent)

*Natural flavors

Yeast

*Modified corn starch

Natural smoke flavor

Salt

Sodium phosphate

Less than 2% of beef broth

Potassium phosphate

Potassium lactate

______

No quiero Taco Sell !

____________

edited 1/26/11 to add that the 36% - 64% meat to "other" ingredient ratio claim, came from stories in many media outlets including the Huffington Post, ABC world news, Gizmodo, etc, based on the class action lawsuit filed by an Alabama law firm, Blood Hurst & O' Reardon, LLP, San Diego, CA, which says the USDA requires at least 40% meat for anything being sold as "meat filling," but Taco Bell is calling the filling "beef" in its advertising.

quote: "In reality, a substantial majority of the filling is comprised of substances other than beef, and is required to be labeled and advertised as "Taco Meat Filling." "Taco meat filling is not Beef." "This action seeks to require Taco Bell to properly advertise and label these food items and to engage in corrective advertising... "

Amanda Obney, plaintiff, vs. Taco Bell Corporation, defendant

kareng Grand Master

My boys have friends that LOVE TB. They want to like it, too. But they both hate it! I make better tacos and quesidillas at home.

Juliebove Rising Star

I have long known this. I think if you had to eat there, the only safe things are the beans and rice. Golden Corral also uses wheat in their taco meat.

modiddly16 Enthusiast

If anyone is shocked by the lack of real beef in their meat, they should probably get out more!! :D

larry mac Enthusiast

I'm curious where the 36/64% came from. That's not information that is disclosed on the packaging. Ingredients by law are listed in order by weight. The second largest ingredient is water, which is very heavy in comparison with the non-meat ingredients.

I suspect someone just made up those percentages. There are many food products that use TVP as an extender. Nobody's making a fuss about that.

Come on people, what do you expect for a buck?

best regards, lm


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

From the Huffington post:

Attorney Dee Miles said attorneys had Taco Bell's "meat mixture" tested and found it contained less that 35 percent beef.

Open Original Shared Link

larry mac Enthusiast

The FIRST people I would mistrust would be lawyers! It's their job to lie for their clients. :D

The second people I would mistrust would be small independent labs. I can't look that link up right now (I'm on a work computer), so I don't know which lab was used. But I have a story.

I worked at Core Labs, an international gas & oil service company with labs all over the world. One of my duties was to go on location where someone had blown themselves up lighting their furnace and collect samples of propane from their actual tank. This is always done under the watchful eyes of lawyers representing the family and the lawyers representing the gas company (that is being sued by the family). The plaintiffs always claim there was no odorant in the propane, and therefore no warning smell that would have alerted the person blown up that he should not light the furnace. By law, a certain amount of a horrible smelling chemical (methyl mercaptan) must be added to the propane, which is odorless.

What actually happens though, the person does smell the odorant, but doesn't recognize the hazard. Anyway, the plaintiffs lawyers get some tiny lab to analize the samples and always say there is no odorant. We would analize the same samples and there would indeed be odorant. Being the one that did the analysis, I can personally attest to that. We had no reason to lie. I made the same money one way or the other, and whatever the results were, that's what they were.

That's why I'm interested in finding out more about that analysis. I'm thinking a lot of that percentage is water. That would be misleading.

best regards, lm

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,317
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JFord
    Newest Member
    JFord
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hello @Cathijean90 Firstly, welcome to the forum, you have come to the right place! I know this is much easier to say than to do, but try not to worry.  Whilst it is awful on so many levels that you have only just found out that Coeliac Disease is the issue behind all your problems, when you could have known 15 years ago, as Trents has said, it is really not at all uncommon for people to have symptoms for years before the doctors know what they are dealing with.  I was worried, too, that I'd never get better when I was first diagnosed.  My nutritionist said it wasn't too late and I didn't believe her!  But you know what -  I am feeling so much better now.  I've known of people living near me who were diagnosed in their 70s and 80s and have bounced back, and my consultant has even diagnosed someone in their 90s!  So being diagnosed older is something that also happens a lot. I am now in my 50s but my first symptoms, looking back, probably started with bouts of diarrhea in my teens and terrible nauseating migraines in my 20s, with a mouth full of ulcers twice in my 30s, aura migraines starting with my first pregnancy at 34, hallucinations with both pregnancies and a pre-term baby with my second pregnancy.  Weird liver function tests suggestive and iron deficiency, which sent me into a spin because my GP said it might be a type of cancer, then blood in my stools and clinical anxiety in the months prior to my diagnosis.    Wow - what gluten can do to someone!  But now, apart from a few minor issues with aura migraines, these issues have gone away.  It has been so worth giving up gluten, people say I have good self-control but frankly, and I am sure you feel the same, knowing how sick gluten can make us, I'm not remotely interested in eating gluten ever again! I've recently discovered my GP didn't tell me my cholesterol is creeping up when he tested me three years ago.  If I had known I'd have started being much more careful with my diet.  I dread to think what my cholesterol levels are now,  I'll have to do a test sooner or later but I do need to try to do something about it now.  So I do relate with your situation. To have not had the diagnosis passed onto you is awful.  But the good news is you do know now.   Also, you will be taking your diet seriously, which will give you the best chance of a good recovery.   Kick gluten out of your diet, get your doctor to run some tests to see if you have any vitamin deficiencies, and address those, and also see if you have any thyroid issues which occasionally affect coeliacs and can be easily treated.   Build your strength up with the best whole food you can manage, and try to take one day at at time.  On having children:  my friend had a series of miscarriages before she was diagnosed with coeliac disease, and then when she started a gluten free diet, no more - she carried two more pregnancies to term.   I am so glad you have a faith, my Christian faith has been a huge help to me on my journey.   Two  books on anxiety and depression too, helped, if you feel you are struggling with either or both.  The Depression Cure: The Six-Step Programme to Beat Depression Without Drugs, by Dr Steve Llardi, and At Last a Life by Paul David.  Both available online. Come back to us if you have any more questions.  You are not alone. Cristiana    
    • Jack Common
      Thank you for your answer. I read it here: https://www.beyondceliac.org/celiac-disease/non-celiac-gluten-sensitivity/ With the title "What’s the Difference Between Gluten Sensitivity and Celiac Disease?"
    • Jack Common
    • Jacki Espo
      For me I gave up oat products and it finally cleared. I had a whole body reaction for months. Two additional culprits for me: shared grill at a restaurant or a shared toaster.  Hope you have relief soon. 
    • Russ H
      It can take between 6 months and 2 years for the dermatitis herpetiformis rash to resolve. The symptoms of dermatitis herpetiformis arise from deposits of certain antibodies building up in the skin. These deposits attract immune cells leading to inflammation and blistering. It can take 10 years for the deposits to be reabsorbed although symptoms resolve long before this.
×
×
  • Create New...