Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Weird Testing Progress. Even Doctor Baffled.


Cara in Boston

Recommended Posts

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Here's my (ongoing) story. Couple of months ago, my son (5) was having stomach aches and we had noticed a dramatic change in behavior. His doctor gave him a blood test for celiac and he tested positive on a couple of them, but not all. He also was tested for the gene and he has one. We are still waiting on the next steps for him. He is still eating gluten, but not complaining of any discomfort. His behavior is still challenging and not at all what we have seen for the previous 5 years.

Anyway, in the meantime, I got myself tested and my older son. In reading about celiac disease I realized I have had many of the symptoms (even been to various doctors about them) over the past 5 years. Everything was always unresolved, but would eventually go away. Some symptoms come and go regularly. My test came back positive.

I got an appointment with a Celiac specialist for Monday, 2/28. Right after Valentine's Day, I decided to try going gluten-free because the following week was the kids' school vacation and I really wanted to feel good (have energy, no brain fog, etc. etc.) So I went gluten-free. The brain fog went away immediately. Other than that, it seemed my other symptoms got worse. On top of that I had a terrible headache for days (withdrawal?).

When I saw the doctor on Monday, he said the blood test results alone were enough for a diagnosis and combined with my symptoms, he was certain I have celiac disease. He scheduled me for an endoscopy two days later and took blood samples that day. I told him I had been gluten-free for about 10 days and he said that was not long enough to change the outcome and that I should go home and eat lots of gluten for the rest of the day and the next day in anticipation of the scope.

I went home and had some delicious French bread and my headache was gone within 30 minutes and I felt pretty good. I was kind of expecting to get some serious GI symptoms because I had been gluten-free but I continued to feel good the rest of the night and the next day.

On Wednesday (yesterday) I still felt great. Went to my endoscopy appointment, everything went well. Before the procedure, the Dr. tells me he is confused by my blood test from Monday; it was perfectly within normal limits (the previous test was way off). The scope was scheduled just to have a starting point to monitor my progress, not really for a diagnosis. Anyway, after the procedure, he told me everything looked perfectly fine. No damage at all. He said it would be impossible to heal like that with only 10 days of being gluten free. He said in all his years working with celiac disease he has never seen anything like this and can only assume that the original tests were somehow incorrect.

He is a leading specialist in Celiac Disease, so I trust that he actually has seen lots of cases and that he is up on the most current information. He seemed genuinely baffled by his findings.

The weird thing is that it really did explain all my strange symptoms, and with my son having tested positive for (at the least) a gluten sensitivity, maybe more, really, what are the chances that this was some kind of mistake?

The doctor hasn't given up. He wants me to eat gluten for 3 months and then come back in for more blood tests. While I know I should be glad I may not have to change my diet, I was sort of happy with the diagnosis because it explained so much and gave me hope of feeling good again in the near future. I am not looking forward to waiting three more months.

He also did a biopsy, and will call me with the results but he said from the visual inspection, everything looked healthy.

Also, now I'm kind of grossed out by gluten. Even though I wasn't gluten-free long enough to feel good, I really don't have any desire to eat it. I have to consciously remember to include it. This will be a long three months.

Has anyone had a similar experience (reversal of test results) after such a short time being gluten-free? And if I really did somehow heal that quickly, wouldn't I have felt better while gluten-free?

I know I shouldn't have changed my diet. I was bad. I was impatient.

Is it weird that I am secretly hoping something will show up in the biopsy that will confirm the diagnosis? My husband thinks I'm crazy to "want" to have Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



confused mom Rookie

Something similar happened to my daughter. She was having terrible stomach aches for about a month and her pediatrician sent her to a GI specialist. She tested positive for Celiac but her biopsy from the endoscopy was negative. So he's calling it "Latent Celiac," meaning it hasn't actually affected her yet. She also tested positive for the gene. He wants her to continue with gluten-free indefinitely. It's frustrating because he says that since it's "latent," that the Celiac isn't the cause of her stomach aches. The cause is irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. I am leary of having her go gluten-free for the rest of her life if she doesn't really need to. I can understand your hoping for a Celiac diagnosis. If you felt better going gluten-free, then you should continue it. Maybe you have latent Celiac as well.

nora-n Rookie

On another forum, there was this man who was very ill from celiac, had positive endoscopy, and went strictly gluten free.

Because of celiac-related health problems, he was back in hospital (he had edema from lack of nutrients) and then they did another endo (different hospital) and it was normal , and this was just four or six weeks after, I do not remember. The second hospital denied he had ever been celiac.

He used to tell that story to illustrate that one can heal prety wuick.

In fact, the lining of the intestines is amongst the quickest healingparts of the body. Just think of what happens if you bite something in your mouth.

And, it is often after serious stress that one develops celiac, bout all the time before, the body was able to heal after eating gluten, but during stress it was not--but all along one was intolerant to gluten.

the antibody test will only be positive after severe cell damage. That is what it detects. So when the body is able to heal the villi after just some days like after you bit your mouth, then there won

hnybny91 Rookie

Something similar happened to my daughter. She was having terrible stomach aches for about a month and her pediatrician sent her to a GI specialist. She tested positive for Celiac but her biopsy from the endoscopy was negative. So he's calling it "Latent Celiac," meaning it hasn't actually affected her yet. She also tested positive for the gene. He wants her to continue with gluten-free indefinitely. It's frustrating because he says that since it's "latent," that the Celiac isn't the cause of her stomach aches. The cause is irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. I am leary of having her go gluten-free for the rest of her life if she doesn't really need to. I can understand your hoping for a Celiac diagnosis. If you felt better going gluten-free, then you should continue it. Maybe you have latent Celiac as well.

Please do not think that she can go back to eating gluten just because it hadn't damaged her intestines yet. You have been given a GIFT of a diagnosis without your daughter having to endure YEARS AND YEARS of misery. Many of us wish we had been given that gift. Please do not throw that away. She needs to stay gluten free FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,742
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.