Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Weird Testing Progress. Even Doctor Baffled.


Cara in Boston

Recommended Posts

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Here's my (ongoing) story. Couple of months ago, my son (5) was having stomach aches and we had noticed a dramatic change in behavior. His doctor gave him a blood test for celiac and he tested positive on a couple of them, but not all. He also was tested for the gene and he has one. We are still waiting on the next steps for him. He is still eating gluten, but not complaining of any discomfort. His behavior is still challenging and not at all what we have seen for the previous 5 years.

Anyway, in the meantime, I got myself tested and my older son. In reading about celiac disease I realized I have had many of the symptoms (even been to various doctors about them) over the past 5 years. Everything was always unresolved, but would eventually go away. Some symptoms come and go regularly. My test came back positive.

I got an appointment with a Celiac specialist for Monday, 2/28. Right after Valentine's Day, I decided to try going gluten-free because the following week was the kids' school vacation and I really wanted to feel good (have energy, no brain fog, etc. etc.) So I went gluten-free. The brain fog went away immediately. Other than that, it seemed my other symptoms got worse. On top of that I had a terrible headache for days (withdrawal?).

When I saw the doctor on Monday, he said the blood test results alone were enough for a diagnosis and combined with my symptoms, he was certain I have celiac disease. He scheduled me for an endoscopy two days later and took blood samples that day. I told him I had been gluten-free for about 10 days and he said that was not long enough to change the outcome and that I should go home and eat lots of gluten for the rest of the day and the next day in anticipation of the scope.

I went home and had some delicious French bread and my headache was gone within 30 minutes and I felt pretty good. I was kind of expecting to get some serious GI symptoms because I had been gluten-free but I continued to feel good the rest of the night and the next day.

On Wednesday (yesterday) I still felt great. Went to my endoscopy appointment, everything went well. Before the procedure, the Dr. tells me he is confused by my blood test from Monday; it was perfectly within normal limits (the previous test was way off). The scope was scheduled just to have a starting point to monitor my progress, not really for a diagnosis. Anyway, after the procedure, he told me everything looked perfectly fine. No damage at all. He said it would be impossible to heal like that with only 10 days of being gluten free. He said in all his years working with celiac disease he has never seen anything like this and can only assume that the original tests were somehow incorrect.

He is a leading specialist in Celiac Disease, so I trust that he actually has seen lots of cases and that he is up on the most current information. He seemed genuinely baffled by his findings.

The weird thing is that it really did explain all my strange symptoms, and with my son having tested positive for (at the least) a gluten sensitivity, maybe more, really, what are the chances that this was some kind of mistake?

The doctor hasn't given up. He wants me to eat gluten for 3 months and then come back in for more blood tests. While I know I should be glad I may not have to change my diet, I was sort of happy with the diagnosis because it explained so much and gave me hope of feeling good again in the near future. I am not looking forward to waiting three more months.

He also did a biopsy, and will call me with the results but he said from the visual inspection, everything looked healthy.

Also, now I'm kind of grossed out by gluten. Even though I wasn't gluten-free long enough to feel good, I really don't have any desire to eat it. I have to consciously remember to include it. This will be a long three months.

Has anyone had a similar experience (reversal of test results) after such a short time being gluten-free? And if I really did somehow heal that quickly, wouldn't I have felt better while gluten-free?

I know I shouldn't have changed my diet. I was bad. I was impatient.

Is it weird that I am secretly hoping something will show up in the biopsy that will confirm the diagnosis? My husband thinks I'm crazy to "want" to have Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



confused mom Rookie

Something similar happened to my daughter. She was having terrible stomach aches for about a month and her pediatrician sent her to a GI specialist. She tested positive for Celiac but her biopsy from the endoscopy was negative. So he's calling it "Latent Celiac," meaning it hasn't actually affected her yet. She also tested positive for the gene. He wants her to continue with gluten-free indefinitely. It's frustrating because he says that since it's "latent," that the Celiac isn't the cause of her stomach aches. The cause is irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. I am leary of having her go gluten-free for the rest of her life if she doesn't really need to. I can understand your hoping for a Celiac diagnosis. If you felt better going gluten-free, then you should continue it. Maybe you have latent Celiac as well.

nora-n Rookie

On another forum, there was this man who was very ill from celiac, had positive endoscopy, and went strictly gluten free.

Because of celiac-related health problems, he was back in hospital (he had edema from lack of nutrients) and then they did another endo (different hospital) and it was normal , and this was just four or six weeks after, I do not remember. The second hospital denied he had ever been celiac.

He used to tell that story to illustrate that one can heal prety wuick.

In fact, the lining of the intestines is amongst the quickest healingparts of the body. Just think of what happens if you bite something in your mouth.

And, it is often after serious stress that one develops celiac, bout all the time before, the body was able to heal after eating gluten, but during stress it was not--but all along one was intolerant to gluten.

the antibody test will only be positive after severe cell damage. That is what it detects. So when the body is able to heal the villi after just some days like after you bit your mouth, then there won

hnybny91 Rookie

Something similar happened to my daughter. She was having terrible stomach aches for about a month and her pediatrician sent her to a GI specialist. She tested positive for Celiac but her biopsy from the endoscopy was negative. So he's calling it "Latent Celiac," meaning it hasn't actually affected her yet. She also tested positive for the gene. He wants her to continue with gluten-free indefinitely. It's frustrating because he says that since it's "latent," that the Celiac isn't the cause of her stomach aches. The cause is irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. I am leary of having her go gluten-free for the rest of her life if she doesn't really need to. I can understand your hoping for a Celiac diagnosis. If you felt better going gluten-free, then you should continue it. Maybe you have latent Celiac as well.

Please do not think that she can go back to eating gluten just because it hadn't damaged her intestines yet. You have been given a GIFT of a diagnosis without your daughter having to endure YEARS AND YEARS of misery. Many of us wish we had been given that gift. Please do not throw that away. She needs to stay gluten free FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - RMJ replied to colinukcoeliac's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      4

      What should I expect from a UK restaurant advertising / offering "Gluten Free" food

    2. - knitty kitty replied to Mihai's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      14

      Pain in the right side of abdomen

    3. - trents replied to colinukcoeliac's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      4

      What should I expect from a UK restaurant advertising / offering "Gluten Free" food

    4. - Scott Adams replied to colinukcoeliac's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      4

      What should I expect from a UK restaurant advertising / offering "Gluten Free" food

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      Barilla gluten free pasta

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,480
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    radster47
    Newest Member
    radster47
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      Hopefully @Cristiana will see this question, as she also lives in the UK.
    • knitty kitty
      @Theresa2407, My Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFD), now called Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD), cleared up, resolved, after supplementing with Thiamine B1 and Riboflavin B2.  "Specifically, higher intakes of vitamin B1 and vitamin B2 were negatively associated with the risk of NAFLD. Consequently, providing adequate levels of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B2 in the daily diets of postmenopausal women could potentially serve as a preventive measure against NAFLD." Association between dietary intakes of B vitamins and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10621796/ High-dose vitamin B1 therapy prevents the development of experimental fatty liver driven by overnutrition https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7988776/
    • trents
      Welcome to the the celiac.com community @colinukcoeliac! I am in the USA but I don't think it is any different here in my experience. In some large cities there are dedicated gluten free restaurants where only gluten free ingredients are found. However, there are a growing number of mainstream eatery chains that advertise gluten free menu items but they are likely cooked and prepared along with gluten containing foods. They are just not set up to offer a dedicated gluten free cooking, preparation and handling environment. There simply isn't space for it and it would not be cost effective. And I think you probably realize that restaurants operate on a thin margin of profit. As the food industry has become more aware of celiac disease and the issue of cross contamination I have noticed that some eateries that used to offer "gluten free" menu items not have changed their terminology to "low gluten" to reflect the possibility of cross contamination.  I would have to say that I appreciate the openness and honesty of the response you got from your email inquiry. It also needs to be said that the degree of cross contamination happening in that eatery may still allow the food they advertise as gluten free to meet the regulatory standards of gluten free advertising which, in the USA is not more than 20ppm of gluten. And that is acceptable for most celiacs and those who are gluten sensitive. Perhaps you might suggest to the eatery that they add a disclaimer about cross contamination to the menu itself.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a very common source of frustration within the celiac community. Many restaurants, including large chain restaurants, now offer a "gluten-free" menu, or mark items on their menu as gluten-free. Some of them then include a standard CYA disclaimer like what you experienced--that they can't guarantee your food will be gluten-free. Should they even bother at all? This is a good question, and if they can't actually deliver gluten-free food, should they even be legally allowed to make any claims around it?  Personally I view a gluten-free menu as a basic guide that can help me order, but I still explain that I really have celiac disease and need my food to be gluten-free. Then I take some AN-PEP enzymes when my food arrives just in case there may be contamination. So far this has worked for me, and for others here. It is frustrating that ordering off a gluten-free menu doesn't mean it's actually safe, however, I do feel somewhat thankful that it does at least signal an awareness on their part, and an attempt to provide safe food. For legal reasons they likely need to add the disclaimer, but it may also be necessary because on a busy night, who knows what could happen?
    • Scott Adams
      That is a very old study that concludes "Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of CD patients", and I've not seen any substantive studies that support the idea that corn would be a risk for celiacs, although some people with celiac disease could have a separate intolerance to it, just like those without celiac disease might have corn intolerance.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.