Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Missed Diagnosis,conflicting Diagnosis


lexusca

Recommended Posts

lexusca Rookie

Has anyone ever been given a conflicting diagnosis. How frustrating,seen the specialist last tuesday and I get the you have celiac, but you might not...but chances are you do. Biopsy was positve for celliac but blood work did not. Now I have been told to eat gluten and have another scope,catscan and bloodwork every week. Anyone else have this problem. I am so ready to lose it :o


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



zus888 Contributor

Has anyone ever been given a conflicting diagnosis. How frustrating,seen the specialist last tuesday and I get the you have celiac, but you might not...but chances are you do. Biopsy was positve for celliac but blood work did not. Now I have been told to eat gluten and have another scope,catscan and bloodwork every week. Anyone else have this problem. I am so ready to lose it :o

Yes, but my Gi doc had a the complete opposite recommendation. I also got a 2nd opinion with the same recommendation as my Gi doc, which was to go on a strict gluten-free diet and get re-scoped in about a year. That's really the only way to rule out or confirm celiac. (Villous blunting was found in endoscopic biopsy, but blood tests were mostly negative - I had one weak positive Gliadin IgG).

mamaw Community Regular

Sounds like another mainstream doctor who knows nothing about celiac or gluten sensitivity... there are tons of these . type doctors running loose & getting paid big bucks.......sorry ....I would not subject myself to scopes even monthly...I would either go gluten-free on my own or else find a doctor who knows about celiac...

If you let us know where you are from maybe someone will give you a name of a doctor who understands celiac.

Hope you find answers soon

blessings

mamaw

sa1937 Community Regular

Has anyone ever been given a conflicting diagnosis. How frustrating,seen the specialist last tuesday and I get the you have celiac, but you might not...but chances are you do. Biopsy was positve for celliac but blood work did not. Now I have been told to eat gluten and have another scope,catscan and bloodwork every week. Anyone else have this problem. I am so ready to lose it :o

Huh? I am also very confused by your post.

You mean you already got the biopsy results? It usually takes a week or so. IF the biopsy was positive, it would trump the negative blood work and you have celiac. False negatives are not uncommon on the celiac blood panel. Did you get copies of the celiac panel (hopefully your dr. requested the complete panel or the new DGP test) as well as a copy of the biopsy results? If not, get copies and post results here when you do...there are some knowledgeable people here who can help you interpret them.

I'm more than confused by a repeat scope, cat scan and bloodwork. ??? If your biopsy was positive, why would your dr. want you to go back to eating gluten?

txplowgirl Enthusiast

Positive biopsy is the Gold standard diagnosis. You are Celiac and the dr is an idiot.

zus888 Contributor

Actually, villous blunting and the other biopsy results that are representative of celiac aren't NECESSARILY due to celiac. The physiological changes to the small intestine could also be due to soy or milk intolerance, Crohns, intestinal carcinoma, lymphoma, and some others that I cannot remember. Yes, the chances of it being celiac is much greater than the other issues, but you'd have to do more testing to really be sure. The "testing" my doc has suggested is doing a strict gluten-free diet for a year, do another scope, and if my intestines are healthy, then we have our answer. If not, then we'll need to look further into the other possible causes.

I have talked to him about this because they found inflamed abdominal lymph nodes during an ultrasound in monitoring another disease I have. To me, I feel the chances of my biopsies being the result of something more sinister (like lymphoma) are higher because we have what could be another symptom or sign that points to that. I didn't want him to jump to conclusions and diagnose celiac without as least considering the other possibilities because if it is something like cancer, then the earlier we find it and deal with it, the better chances I have. So, those possibilities are in the back of his mind (as with the doc who gave me the second opinion), but we are all hoping that it is celiac (and chances are that's exactly what it is). But only until we see improvement after going gluten-free will we know for sure.

Personally, I also find it VERY odd to get weekly blood tests for celiac, let alone the scope and CT scan.

ReferencePlease Newbie

Has anyone ever been given a conflicting diagnosis. How frustrating,seen the specialist last tuesday and I get the you have celiac, but you might not...but chances are you do. Biopsy was positve for celliac but blood work did not. Now I have been told to eat gluten and have another scope,catscan and bloodwork every week. Anyone else have this problem. I am so ready to lose it :o

If you feel better being off gluten, don't go near the stuff. I have opted to skip any more testing because making myself ill to get the proper label (celiac or wheat intolerant) is just not worth it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,035
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bostonbell
    Newest Member
    bostonbell
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      Thankyou so much for your words.Its a hard battle when a supposed well known hospital whose celiac " specialist " has down played me because my colon looks fine and put it in my medical and so pcp doesn't take seriously. In their eyes we all carry that gene.Im having alot of bad days trying to be positive because of it.
    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.