Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Threshold Of Acceptability


October3

Recommended Posts

October3 Explorer

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?

Those companies are just giving CYA statements. NO company can guarentee that anything is 100% gluten free. Although some things you can be more sure about than others, it is physically impossible to test for no gluten. The most sensitive test detects 5 PPM.

From an experience standpoint--I am very sensitive to cc and I have not had to worry wbout my toothpaste. I use Crest, Colgate and Aquafresh (whatever I can get free with a coupon).

sa1937 Community Regular

I totally agree with GlutenFreeManna. Not everything we use will have a gluten-free label slapped on it and the companies are being honest about not being able to guarantee gluten-free status of ingredients. So yes, CYA statements abound.

That said, I use Colgate toothpaste and have no problem with it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Barbara 1981
    Newest Member
    Barbara 1981
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • trents
      Jason, I have a bone to pick with your terminology. There is "gluten intolerance" which I believe is synonymous with celiac disease and then there is "gluten sensitivity" which comes from Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short. It is true, however, that there is still a lot of inconsistency in the use of these terms.
    • Liquid lunch
      I can’t say this will work for everyone but for me the difference is incredible so might be worth trying. I’ve never been diagnosed celiac but via an elimination diet I realised I can’t eat any lectins, gluten soy and oats are particularly problematic. If I eat them I’m in bed for a week, then heavy bleeding and extreme pain for another, followed by a third week of bleeding on and off. My skin was a mess and it snowed when I brushed my hair. Since taking reishi and cordyceps mushroom tincture I can’t believe the difference, I’ve had a lot of help from this site so I want to return the favour. I took the tincture for my guts but the most apparent effect is that I feel like my brain works again, I can’t begin to describe how wonderful it is to be able to achieve basic things, I’ve barely been able to organise getting out of bed for so long, it feels like I haven’t been hit over the head with a mallet for the first time in years. Then I glutened myself, not necessarily gluten as so many things wipe me out but definitely ate something I shouldn’t have, I took a treble dose of the tincture and almost immediately felt much better so continued with the increased dose and three days (not weeks) later was back to feeling great, no bleeding involved. My skin is better than I can remember it ever being, I feel great 😊. I spend £1.50 a day on these but it’s worth every penny, I hope this helps someone else out there reading this. I wish I’d known about them 20 years ago. best wishes everyone 🍄 
    • Scott Adams
      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
×
×
  • Create New...