Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

"diagnosed" Today


Racer-J

Recommended Posts

Racer-J Newbie

So, I got my results back earlier today:

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Test

Fecal Anti-gliadin IgA 11 Units (Normal Range is less than 10 Units)

I went gluten-free (gluten free) sometime in October of 2011 shortly after my father was diagnosed with Celiac so, not much is going to change for me. Like everyone else though it's nice "to know". I'm curious what my results would have been prior to going gluten-free but, at the time we didn't know about EnteroLab and, I didn't have insurance or the money to have the tests run that a doctor would have ordered. Going gluten-free alone was enough to show me that I had issues with gluten though but, my father really wanted me to have some type of testing done, and this was the only one that didn't require me to add gluten back in my diet.

I'm really glad the number wasn't super high this far into being gluten-free but, I am also glad I didn't wait any longer to have this test done as it could have come back as a false negative. Then again, the number between 10 and 500 isn't a measure of severity. However, I'm assuming it still could have shown under 10 at some point in time if I wasn't producing the intestinal IgA antibody.

Anyway, this is the closest I will be getting to a celiac diagnosis. I know that it's technically not since it was for gluten sensitivity but, gluten was definitely never going back to my diet even prior to this test. Maybe some day they will have a way to diagnosis it without gluten needing to be present in you to the extent of it saturating your blood and destroying your digestive system. Until then though, this is the closest I will get. Since my father is Celiac though, I'm just going to go ahead and self diagnose lol.

I may have the gene test run at a later date just out of curiosity to see which genes I have.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mari Contributor

I read in the Celiac.com newsletter a while back that researchers are developing a new test for celiac disease that only has a short gluten challange time, I think it was about 5 days. After the challange a blood sample is drawn and tested with a dye to count the number of the antibody producing cells.

Racer-J Newbie

I read in the Celiac.com newsletter a while back that researchers are developing a new test for celiac disease that only has a short gluten challange time, I think it was about 5 days. After the challange a blood sample is drawn and tested with a dye to count the number of the antibody producing cells.

I think I would be ready to take a long walk off a short pier after 24 hours lol. I'm just joking of course. That really sounds interesting though and hopefully, they can get that sorted out. It would obviously still be damaging but, it would be a lot less damaging that the current longterm test demands. If something like that was offered, I might be tempted to reintroduce gluten. It's something I would have to think awfully long and hard about though as I do not miss feeling like I was run over by a steamroller.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,817
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Terry49
    Newest Member
    Terry49
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
×
×
  • Create New...