Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Without Blood Test?


MJ-S

Recommended Posts

MJ-S Contributor

I've been trying to convince my mom to get a Celiac blood test since I discovered my own gluten intolerance this year and learned about Celiac disease. She's had a lifetime of fatigue, low energy and mood, iron deficiency, food allergies and sensitivities, lactose intolerance, bloating, gas, reflux, facial tics, sleep issues, etc. She's been resisting, so it's a work in progress.

Without telling me she was going to do it, she went to her doctor a few weeks ago and had blood tests run because of her worsening fatigue. They found low B12, but didn't test for Celiac. She didn't mention the stomach issues (which she's convinced are just normal for her), or my own gluten intolerance. When I found out, I told her she should have told the doctor about it.

She's terrified the doctor may actually test her and find a positive result, which is why she didn't mention it. She also swears that bread doesn't make her sick (she's addicted to it), and I'm having a hard time convincing her that the effects are not always obvious/immediate after you eat gluten. She also says if she had celiac she'd be dead by now (she's 68) and again, I'm having trouble convincing her that not everyone gets deathly ill by age X with the same symptoms. Part of the problem is that she has a friend with Celiac who was extremely sick before she was diagnosed, so she thinks everyone has to be the same. We're having a lot of teaching moments, but I'm not sure how much she's listening. rolleyes.gif

So last week, also without letting me know, she went to a new GI specialist, this time for an ongoing hemorrhoid problem. She also goes to the bathroom several times a day, and is concerned about the frequency. So this time she mentioned the gas/reflux issues and told him I have Celiac (I'm not exactly diagnosed, but it got his attention).

He perked right up when he heard this, and in addition to scheduling her for a colonoscopy, he added an endoscopy. She's having it all done on Wednesday.

He told her that the chances of another family member having Celiac is 20% - is this an accurate number?

I'm concerned because he didn't run a blood panel. If the biopsy is positive, we'll know. But it it's negative, I'll never get her to ask for a blood test now. I wish he had ordered the blood test before running the endoscopy (that's what my GI doc did).

Is this common? Ok? What to do with a negative biopsy result now, when I want her to get this thoroughly checked out. I suppose no need to worry until AFTER the results come in, but I did want your opinions on this.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jenniferxgfx Contributor

If she's eating that much gluten, I think the endoscopy will be more useful than blood tests. That said, she/you should know a negative biopsy doesnt mean no celiac or gluten intolerance. a gluten-free diet could still help her.

Skylark Collaborator

20% is about right for relatives for celiac. It's much higher for gluten intolerance.

I imagine her GI doctor was going to do the colonoscopy and decided it was worthwhile to do the endoscopy as well. Villous damage is diagnostic, so if she comes up with that no blood work is necessary. If she comes back with a normal biopsy, I agree it's tricky.

MJ-S Contributor

Thanks for the responses!

They found stomach polyps (a lot of them) and diverticulosis. Biopsy results are not in yet, so we wait.

Marilyn R Community Regular

Thanks for the responses!

They found stomach polyps (a lot of them) and diverticulosis. Biopsy results are not in yet, so we wait.

It seems weird that the Gastro didn't send her to a lab for a Celiac Panel. Not being cynical or anything, :o but if he had a plebotomist in his office, I'm sure he would have ordered the blood test.

It it helps, tell your mom that sombody's (internet buddy?) mother died at 87 with celiac disease. Her cause of death was not celiac disease, but her quality of life was greatly diminished by not sticking to the diet. Mom's great aunt died at 97 this month. My great great aunt was in assisted living, not a nursing home like Mom had been in for years.

As much as it hurts, if your mom chooses to continue eating gluten, you can't do anything about it. She won't accept role reversal, you cannot be her mother. It's tough, makes you want to pull your hair out, but it's something you may have to deal with. :ph34r:

If your Mom has signed you off on the HIPA paperwork, it may be helpful to talk with the doctor's office regarding advice for your mom. She's more likely to listen to a medical assistant or doctor than take advice from her daughter.

Good luck! May the force be with you!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,984
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    henrygreen
    Newest Member
    henrygreen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...