Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac W/newborn


celiacmama

Recommended Posts

celiacmama Newbie

Hi! I have celiac disease (diagnosed in June '04) and am also a new mom. My son is only 3 mo. old and our pediatrician told us that they typically cannot test children for celiac disease until they are 2 years old. I'm concerned that once he's on solids (which is well before 2 yrs) and he ingests gluten, that it may cause him problems. I'm interested to know if any of you have a young child with celiac disease. If so, when did you have him/her tested? What has your experience been with your child's docs? Should I find a pediatric gastro doc? I want to give my son as much protection from gluten (if he needs it) and teach him the right way to eat as early as possible. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Usually testing below the age of 2 is inaccurate. When he starts with solid foods keep an eye and see if there are any noticeable reactions and when he is old enough get him tested.

lovegrov Collaborator

Your pediatrician is right. Celiac blood tests are not as accurate in children under 2, and before a certain age (which would be different in different children) would be completely useless.

Most experts these days would say that you should allow your child to eat gluten the same time any other child would eat it. In fact, some recent research (which I can't find the link to) suggests that children who either eat gluten real early or who are delayed past about 12 months, are actually more likely to develop celiac.

richard

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I thought the research said that introducing grains between 4 and 6 months could trigger gluten sensitivity? I can't keep up.

lbsteenwyk Explorer

Yes, a recent study suggests that the best time to introduce gluten to minimize the possibility of developing celiac disease is between 4-6 months of age. There is also evidence that breastfeeding well past the introduction of gluten can have a beneficial impact. If you are breastfeeding, I would suggest continuing for at least 1 year (which is recommended anyway by the American Academy of Pediatrics) to supplement your child as solids are introduced.

lovegrov Collaborator

Four to six months, that's the timeframe I was trying to think of. Anyway, there's seems to be little doubt that most researchers believe that keeping a child from gluten (unless you know they have celiac disease) is more likely to trigger celiac disease once they do eat it -- and eventually they will.

richard

aidansmom Rookie

My son had "typical" celiac disease symptoms. He had lots of tummy problems as an infant - reflux, gassy, rashes, etc - but he did grow on the growth curve. I breastfed and started solids at 6 months. Then he started slowing down on growth and completely stopped growing at 9 months. From 6 months until he was diagnosed at 14 months, he would have loose stools 6-7x/day. I was a first time mom and it took me several months to realize that this was not normal. I had to push him through the system. My dr. kept saying that he was normal. Even though he eventually dropped from 50% to 3% on the growth charts.

I also have a 3 month old and I'm breastfeeding and ingesting gluten. Our dr. suggested getting the genetic test in the meantime. We plan to give him gluten at 6 months and watch for the diarrhea and growth.

By the way, gluten DOES go through breastmilk. My son would have severe reactions if I ate a french fry that was contaminated from the oil.

Congrats on your little one!! I hope he stays Celiac free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Merika Contributor

I was diagnosed with celiac when my ds was almost 2 yrs. At first, everything with my ds stayed the same. But I realized I could not (would not) prepare gluten foods for him and also have crumbs and sticky gluten fingers all over the house. In addition, he was having some allergy symptoms/possible slight celiac symptoms, so he went gluten-free.

If your child seems perfectly healthy, just introduce foods like you normally would (when he gets old enough) and watch. Personally, I would be tempted to only feed him gluten-free when he's with you and around the house until he's much older. Let the dad, and other friends and relatives feed him gluten foods when they go out. Little kids are MESSY, and they should be :) but there is no need to gluten yourself by accident just so they can eat gluten. It's not necessary for humans to eat gluten! :)

Merika

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,962
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tiannuo
    Newest Member
    Tiannuo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Pasballard
      I have Celiacs and want you to be aware of the amount of weight you can potentially put on if you rely on gluten free snacks, bread etc.,they  are high in carbs.  I put on 25 lbs in a short amount of time.  Whole Foods are the best way to go but I struggle with this.  The cost of gluten free is also a problem.  I love black licorice but most have gluten.  My favorite chili seasoning as well.  The list is endless.  I take  Advil liquid gels and had no idea until I read this.  I hope you do better than I have done.  I feel I am destined to suffer daily no matter what.  My aunt didn’t take care of herself and died from complications.  I hope you can get on a good routine.
    • growlinhard1
      Thank you, I appreciate the response. I'm going to begin the gluten free diet and wait for the biopsy results. I feel fairly certain that it's the right thing for my well being. I will keep you posted.
    • Scott Adams
      The flu vaccine is indeed not 100% effective every year, as its effectiveness varies depending on how well the vaccine strains match the circulating flu viruses. However, even in years when the match is less than perfect, the flu vaccine still provides significant benefits. Studies consistently show that vaccinated individuals who contract the flu often experience milder symptoms, a lower risk of complications, and a reduced likelihood of hospitalization or death compared to those who are unvaccinated. For high-risk groups, such as the elderly, young children, and individuals with chronic health conditions, the flu vaccine remains a critical tool for reducing severe outcomes. Regarding the mention of risks associated with vaccines, it’s important to note that the flu vaccine is generally very safe for most people. Serious side effects are extremely rare, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks for the vast majority of individuals. If someone has specific concerns about vaccine safety due to medical conditions or allergies, they should consult their healthcare provider to discuss their options. As for alternative measures like a D Lamp (ultraviolet light disinfection), while these can be useful for reducing pathogens in the environment, they are not a substitute for vaccination. The flu virus spreads primarily through respiratory droplets, and personal protection measures like hand hygiene, masking, and improving indoor ventilation can complement vaccination but cannot replace its targeted immune protection.
    • trents
      Because you have already had the "gold standard" test done, and because you have some experiential evidence that removing gluten from your diet causes you to feel better, it would make sense to begin the gluten-free diet as you wait for biopsy results.
    • growlinhard1
      I wasn't given any blood tests. I think I should try the gluten free diet because when I cut it out a few weeks ago for just a couple of days, I know I started feeling better. The difference was actually pretty dramatic. When I learned gluten free eating may cause false negative biopsy results, I went back to gluten full force and feel like you know what × 10. Do you feel it would be okay since the gold standard for diagnosis is behind me or should I wait for biopsy results? In your opinion, of course. I know you can't offer me medical advice.
×
×
  • Create New...