Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Can I Get In To See The Doc Sooner


Newbee

Recommended Posts

Newbee Contributor

So I got the celiac blood work back from GP and it was extremely positive (125). She referred me to see a GI doctor. I got a recommendation for a good GI doctor from someone that leads a celiac support group in town. When I called to make an appointment they told me I'd have to wait a month before I could see the doctor (and that's just for a consultation - not even the biopsy yet). They knew when I called in that it was because I had a positive blood test for celiac. I've since called back and asked if they have a waiting list and could they put me on it in case an opening came available for my doctor so that I could be seen sooner. They said yes. Not sure if that will help or not. Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions on how else I may coax them to get me in earlier. Seems like they should be able to try and fit me in sooner so I can have the biopsy and stop eating gluten and get on with my life. I hate to wait so long and continue to damage my system. And if I have to wait a month for a consultation will I have to wait a month of more for the biopsy? I was thinking maybe I should still call in and check about cancellations or perhaps try and speak to a nurse and see if I can get them to convince them to try and get me in earlier. Any suggestions would be great! Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MJ-S Contributor

Discussing with the nurse sounds like a great idea to me.

Here's a question: If your biopsy is negative would you continue to gluten, knowing that your blood tests were positive?

If it were me, I would stop eating gluten immediately, because I don't see how the results of the biopsy would change this decision.

I'm sure others on the board are more knowledgeable about this, but the intestines take a longer time to heal than it takes for antibody levels to reduce, so I would think you could stop eating gluten, have a biopsy four weeks later, and still see the damage (assuming it's there to begin with).

Newbee Contributor

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

  • 3 weeks later...
vendeengf Newbie

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

ok how i see it is u can stop and feel better or keep eating it and feel like crap . i got my blood work back and it was positive i stopped eating gluten right there and then 6 weeks later i saw the doc 3 weeks later was scoped down the mouth then 3 weeks later took a pill(cam) not so good then 4 weeks later scpoed other end way worse then they though pollip the size of sode pop cap my doc told me he has never seen one that size that isnt cancer befor or someone my age so i say stop

mushroom Proficient

Cancellation lists work sometimes and sometimes they don't. It depends how popular the doctor is and how many people are ahead of you on the list (an important question to ask). I recently had one work for me - ended up with a dud doc, but he ordered the right test. So I saw him on Fri, had test on Mon., but they said it would be five weeks for follow-up. On the cancellation list I saw him within one week so got a copy of the report, which is what I wanted. But generally the good docs are all booked up and have lists of people waiting for cancellations. I waited 2 months last year for a cancellation and didn't get it (didn't think to ask how many people were also waiting :( ).

As for the biopsy, many people (mainly not doctors who make money from doing procedures :P ) feel it is not necessary. After all, as a pp said, if gluten makes you sick would you continue to eat it if your biopsy was negative? However, if you want the "gold standard of celiac diagnosis, you should continue to eat gluten to be sure of an accurate result. While the EGD can tell you other things besides if you have celiac, it can always be done at a later time if they are looking for something else if your symptoms do not resolve on a gluten-free diet.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Call and talk to the appointment taker. Explain that you are on the waiting list already but your really, really need to get in sooner. Ask if there is a certain time of day when you can call everyday and ask if there have been any cancelations. This worked for me last year when I had pneumonia but the ER dr said it might be something more serious based on the cloud on my lung x-ray. I needed to see a pulmonologist ASAP because everyday my breathing was getting worse. I was scared to death it might be lung cancer. The earliest appointment was a month away. I took that appointment but also asked what I could do to get in sooner. They put me on the waiting list but admitted that was a pretty long list of others also wanting to get in sooner. The appointment taker took pity on me (probably because I could barely talk) and told me that if I called everyday at 8 AM that is when they would know if anyone had called to leave a cancellation message the previous night. She got in at 7:30 and reviewed the messages in the first half hour. Although they have the waiting list and would go in order when assigning people to any cancelations she said if someone called at 8:00 AM (the office open time) that she would give any canceled slots to the person on the phone before pulling up the waiting list. It took calling everyday for a week but I did get in earlier and only had to spend about two weeks total thinking I was dying from lung cancer (turned out I just had a bad case of pneumonia and the shadow on my lung was scarring from previous lung infections).

love2travel Mentor

Our typical wait lists for specialists vary from 6-18 MONTHS. I had to wait 8 months for an MRI after an injury; 16 months to see an orthopedic surgeon; 18 months to see a chronic pain management physician; 12 months for a neurosurgeon and so on. Pretty grim here in Canada in many ways. Thankfully I only had to wait to see a gastroenterologist 4 months. My second MRI was only 6 months.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jungle Rookie

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

love2travel Mentor

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

Aren't the waits insane? I was told I could fly to the U.S. for an earlier appointment but as I had to eat lots of gluten for at least three months anyway I decided to go ahead and wait. (I went on the gluten challenge as gluten gives me absolutely zero GI symptoms and as such I was somewhat in denial - I need proof on paper!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,984
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    henrygreen
    Newest Member
    henrygreen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...