Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible False Negative Test?


cassthedancer

Recommended Posts

cassthedancer Newbie

Hi! I was tested for Celiac about a year ago, and got a negative result. Before that, I had been in and out of the doctor's office for a couple other different things. I had been having stomach pain for a while, and was tested for appendicitis. During the required blood tests, the doctor found that I was very, very anemic. Also, it turned out that the stomach pain was being caused by various ovarian cysts. I was put on iron supplements for the anemia and birth control pills to control the cysts. However, I was still having stomach pain, and my hemoglobin and ferratin levels weren't returning to normal. My doctor tested for celiac disease after about six months of this. The test came back negative.

Now, a year later, I am still on high-dosage iron pills and birth control. The doctor says that the anemia is from my heavy periods, but if that was the case, I would think that my lighter periods (due to the birth control) would help my anemia. I believe that the pill is helping the ovarian cyst pain, but I still have random stomach pains. I'm always tired, and I sometimes feel like I'm going to throw up. There are some days when I just can't eat. Another thing that makes me think celiac is a possibility is that five members of my family have autoimmune diseases. (Crohns, ITP, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hepititis, psoratic arthritis.)

So, I'm basically asking if I should be retested. I have to get my blood drawn anyways thanks to the anemia, and with the relatively high false negative rate, I was wondering if it was even possible that I got a false-negative test result.

Sorry for such a huge post... it's been an interesting year and a half. :/ Thank you for reading!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Marilyn R Community Regular

Hi! I was tested for Celiac about a year ago, and got a negative result. Before that, I had been in and out of the doctor's office for a couple other different things. I had been having stomach pain for a while, and was tested for appendicitis. During the required blood tests, the doctor found that I was very, very anemic. Also, it turned out that the stomach pain was being caused by various ovarian cysts. I was put on iron supplements for the anemia and birth control pills to control the cysts. However, I was still having stomach pain, and my hemoglobin and ferratin levels weren't returning to normal. My doctor tested for celiac disease after about six months of this. The test came back negative.

Now, a year later, I am still on high-dosage iron pills and birth control. The doctor says that the anemia is from my heavy periods, but if that was the case, I would think that my lighter periods (due to the birth control) would help my anemia. I believe that the pill is helping the ovarian cyst pain, but I still have random stomach pains. I'm always tired, and I sometimes feel like I'm going to throw up. There are some days when I just can't eat. Another thing that makes me think celiac is a possibility is that five members of my family have autoimmune diseases. (Crohns, ITP, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune hepititis, psoratic arthritis.)

So, I'm basically asking if I should be retested. I have to get my blood drawn anyways thanks to the anemia, and with the relatively high false negative rate, I was wondering if it was even possible that I got a false-negative test result.

Sorry for such a huge post... it's been an interesting year and a half. :/ Thank you for reading!

Hi cassthedancer and welcome! :D

You have quite a few indicators of celiac disease (at least four, five with family history). I'd get retested, and if the results were negative, I'd give gluten-free a whirl.

Wish I had way back when...versus letting my diet snap me practically lifeless. (Dumb thing I did even when symptomatic because doctors didn't tell me what to do.)

Skylark Collaborator

Retesting can't hurt and absolutely try the diet once you're done with the testing. There are plenty of folks who get very sick from gluten and never have any sort of positive lab test or biopsy.

cassthedancer Newbie

Thanks to both of you! :) I guess I just needed some reassurance before I asked the doc to retest.

Jenniferxgfx Contributor

I've been anemic off and on forever. The hematologist said it was either gyn or GI in nature... The gyn said it was heavy periods but that didn't explain my anemia when I was on bc before! The funny part is that when my iron went up with IV infusions, my periods got heavier and more regular! Anemic again, my periods stop almost totally. I really think my lousy periods are a result of malnutrition.

Now I'm going the GI route and have a biopsy in a month. I'm mad I didn't do this sooner. I had a ttg test that was negative 2 yrs ago, and I didn't question it or go gluten-free because my GP insisted ttg was "accurate enough." Sadly, this is the best doc I've ever had.

Anyhow, retesting can't hurt if you're in a position to do it, but I think regardless, it can't hurt to try gluten-free life you know? That's where I'm at, anyway.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,994
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DawnMaureen
    Newest Member
    DawnMaureen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...