Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Well It's Happening


sandsurfgirl

Recommended Posts

sandsurfgirl Collaborator

I've been saying for a long time that people need to stop threatening law suits at restaurants and demanding that they accommodate us. All it does is make them want to quit helping us out.

Bubba Gump's not only got rid of their gluten free menu, but when my friend called our local one the manager said that nothing in their restaurant can be guaranteed gluten free so they can't make us anything except a plain hamburger patty. She said the new owners have a policy that they won't provide gluten free food because they can't know what came from where, blah blah blah.

I went to Mel's Diner in Hollywood and got the same speech. The manager tried to discourage me from eating there and was very difficult, saying everything in the restaurant has gluten. I asked the waitress why he acted that way because when I went there in the past they were accommodating. She said the restaurant was sued and now the owners don't want to offer anything to people with food allergies to avoid more lawsuits.

Woody's diner also did the same thing. They told me they didn't know about gluten and wouldn't be able to make anything for me so we left.

Sometimes people get very irate and say they threatened a lawsuit when they got glutened or they want to pass laws that you have to guarantee your restaurant food is gluten free to serve gluten free food. All that does is hurt all of us! All a restaurant has to do is say that none of their food is gluten free and quit making anything for us to eat. I would do the same thing. If my restaurant was sued or threatened with lawsuits I would just say sorry, there is nothing we can do for you. Eat somewhere else.

When I was in the hospital for colitis the nurse said in all her years of nursing she only had a handful of patients who needed gluten free food. We are not a large group. We are a very small part of the market. The money they get from us eating at their places doesn't make up for even one lawsuit. Restaurants are better off just saying don't eat here and saving themselves if you look at it from a business standpoint.

So please think twice when you go out to eat about the way you handle the wait staff. Don't demand. Don't be difficult and don't threaten them. Be polite and know that you are taking the risk by eating out. If you get glutened don't call them irate and screaming. If you must call, be polite and say this is what you can do to prevent this in the future.

I fear that we won't have any restaurants in the future and I like eating out.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Reba32 Rookie

Yeah, I never understood suing a restaurant for being glutened or coming into contact with an alergen. Honestly, if you're eating in a public restaurant, you're taking your chances.

I've been incredibly lucky since I was diagnosed and have not had any mishaps at all. However, I *always* contact a restaurant ahead of time to find out if they have any gluten free options on the menu, and ask if they are aware of Celiac disease. If the answer is "no", then I find somewhere else to go.

Only once have I gone to a restaurant and not called ahead of time, and they did say they only ne gluten free option, and normally they wouldn't serve a Celiac because the kitchen itself may be cross contaminated. The chef however said that they weren't busy, so it would take him some extra time to prepare my meal, because he would have to run all his utensils thru the dishwasher and scrub the prep area. He said on a busy day though, they would not accomodate me, so I haven't bothered to go back (it's in a casino anyway, and I don't frequent casinos!)

We are lucky that more and more restaurants are offering gluten free menus, and at least here in Ontario Canada, more and more food servers seem to be aware of Celiac disease. With more options, I'm not too worried about the few who refuse to accomdate us. I only worry about potentially being hospitalised and not being able to eat anything!

sreese68 Enthusiast

I agree with you.

I know restaurants aren't always careful, but I wonder if people get glutened for reasons that are not the restaurant's fault and not a result of CC on their end. Like someone with celiac touching a chair or doorknob that the last patron touched with gluteny fingers and then picking up their food with their fingers. Even if you wash your hands before eating, it's hard to sit down at a table and make it through a meal without touching the chair, table, etc. Then, the person blames the cook or wait staff for CC. I recently got mildly glutened waiting for my kids during their gymnastics lesson. Crumbles abound in the waiting room, and I was drinking out of my coffee I brought from home. I'm sure I touched my chair and touched the rim of my coffee. No one to blame but myself.

It'd also be nice if waitstaff were better trained to not touch the tops of glasses, water bottles, plates, etc.

weluvgators Explorer

We have been running into more "no, we cannot accommodate you" attitudes as well. It is an interesting and complex issue. It seems that a celiac / food allergic person's rights should have some protection under the ADA. In "A Guide to Disability Rights Laws" here: Open Original Shared Link is ADA Title III: Public Accommodations, and it applies to restaurants and specifies the following:

"Public accommodations must comply with basic nondiscrimination requirements that prohibit exclusion, segregation, and unequal treatment. They also must comply with specific requirements related to architectural standards for new and altered buildings; reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures; effective communication with people with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities; and other access requirements. Additionally, public accommodations must remove barriers in existing buildings where it is easy to do so without much difficulty or expense, given the public accommodation's resources."

And I think restaurants that claim that they "don't know" or "can't guarantee" the quality/source/ingredients of their food are a bit out of place as purveyors of food and food safety.

Unrelated to food allergy accommodation, but addressing ADA accommodation in a restaurant is this ruling I found: Open Original Shared Link - I thought it was interesting.

I don't know how this will shake out in the future, but I am grateful for those restaurants that have taken an educated lead in accommodating celiacs. This brochure here: Open Original Shared Link has some really great quotes from restaurants that have participated in the Gluten Free Restaurant Awareness Program!

sandsurfgirl Collaborator

We have been running into more "no, we cannot accommodate you" attitudes as well. It is an interesting and complex issue. It seems that a celiac / food allergic person's rights should have some protection under the ADA. In "A Guide to Disability Rights Laws" here: Open Original Shared Link is ADA Title III: Public Accommodations, and it applies to restaurants and specifies the following:

"Public accommodations must comply with basic nondiscrimination requirements that prohibit exclusion, segregation, and unequal treatment. They also must comply with specific requirements related to architectural standards for new and altered buildings; reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures; effective communication with people with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities; and other access requirements. Additionally, public accommodations must remove barriers in existing buildings where it is easy to do so without much difficulty or expense, given the public accommodation's resources."

And I think restaurants that claim that they "don't know" or "can't guarantee" the quality/source/ingredients of their food are a bit out of place as purveyors of food and food safety.

Unrelated to food allergy accommodation, but addressing ADA accommodation in a restaurant is this ruling I found: Open Original Shared Link - I thought it was interesting.

I don't know how this will shake out in the future, but I am grateful for those restaurants that have taken an educated lead in accommodating celiacs. This brochure here: Open Original Shared Link has some really great quotes from restaurants that have participated in the Gluten Free Restaurant Awareness Program!

I don't think celiac counts as a disability. If you can't walk and your wheelchair can't get into a building that doesn't provide a ramp then there is no other option for you. We can't eat three grains out of the millions of foods available in the world and there is food somewhere to eat, just not those particular restaurants. We aren't disabled.

I'm all for free enterprise and making it easier, not harder for people to do business.

I can't imagine forcing restaurants to accommodate food allergies. How could someone allergic to soy eat in any asian restaurant? Or peanut allergic people eat in a Thai place? You can't tell people to change the culture and nature of their food to fit your allergies. The only thing we can do is be polite, thank them for offering gluten free options, patronize them and don't file lawsuits.

I don't see how a lawsuit can win anyway because symptoms can occur so long after the gluten exposure, but just filing the suit causes the owner of the restaurant to lose time and money defending themselves.

kareng Grand Master

That part of the ADA is for physical accommodations to allow everyone accesss to a facility. Once they are in the building, they might not like what is served or sold.

I don't think you can force a store to sell a certain item. If I sold fine jewlery, it would be silly to have a law that said I must also sell bottled water or tires. I have to make it so anyone can come in my store, but I don't have to sell them everything they may care to buy. Even then, the ADA does allow for " reasonable accommodations". It may not be "reasonable" to expect a bakery to sell gluten-free items, too.

What I object to is places saying they have gluten-free food but don't really even try. Places that say the fries are gluten-free because , until they fry them with the onion rings, they are gluten-free. I would prefer they just don't try.

Skylark Collaborator

Unfortunately, it was bound to happen in our litigation-happy society with gluten-free as the current diet fad. There are too many people who think gluten-free simply means no bread or pasta and don't understand how the medical diet works. There are also too many celiacs who have unrealistic expectations about restaurants and CC. It's a bad mix.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cap6 Enthusiast

I couldn't agree more. If we find a place that is willing to accommodate then we need to be appreciative enough to thank them and let them know. If they can't, thank them anyway. We can't always have our way (as much as we might want it!). I also figure that any time we step outside of our own gluten free home we take a chance. Glutening can happen anywhere and you can't always blame it on the restaurant.

annegirl Explorer

I'm less sensitive to gluten than I am to other food items, but still I have gotten a little cc from time to time. On the whole, I've had great experiences eating out. I usually either order a salad with plain chicken, or some type of meat and a plain baked potato.

Honestly, it's more often me that cc's myself. :P The restaurants have all been great, and I travel a lot for work and can be away from my kitchen for weeks at a time.

There are two specific restaurants in my area that have withdrawn gluten free menus and now state that they cannot guarantee anything is gluten free. I just try to go in as early as possible, and kindly let the waitress know that I have food allergies. At this point I have so many that I don't actually list them. I can hardly keep them straight. :P I have not had trouble yet.

And I have been refused service before because of my food allergies. I was in an airport and the gal said that people with food allergies shouldn't eat out. Yeah, like I have a traveling kitchen that they allow me to carry on. >rolls eyes< I definitely think we need to be more kind and less threatening if we want to continue to be served.

navigator Apprentice

I agree that litigation doesn't improve anything and just makes it harder for coeliacs to eat in restaurants. Small businesses struggle in current economic climate and this gives them no incentive to provide gluten free meals. The litigation culture has been slower to hit the UK and doesn't seem to have affected restaurants supplying gluten free foods (at least in my personal experience). I have found chefs to be very accommodating and wanting to provide me with a meal which is not only gluten free but that they can take pride in producing. I find that as long as I'm the one choosing the restaurant and have control of what I'm ordereing that I don't have problems. Where it is problematic is when it's some kind of celebration get together with a large number of people and there is a limited menu provided in a restaurant I've not chosen.

weluvgators Explorer

I don't think celiac counts as a disability.

Celiac and food allergy can qualify as a disability with an American's rights protected under the ADA.

"An individual with a disability is defined by the ADA as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment."

And the part from Title III that I thought was of value was: "reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures". I just don't think that restaurants have a right to blanketly refuse accommodating someone that can be reasonably accommodated, as is the case with some of the blanket "we cannot accommodate you" statements from restaurants that could reasonably accommodate the request.

I don't think that a conventional bakery can make reasonable modifications to accommodate a celiac, but I do think a steakhouse has a decent shot of being able to make reasonable modifications. And I think that it is important to understand our rights as we have agreed to govern ourselves in society, especially in light of statements like, "I fear that we won't have any restaurants in the future".

The airport example is a great one - we just cannot cut off all celiacs and food allergic people from public accommodations when reasonable modifications are possible. And celiacs alone make up approximately 1% of our population. Unfortunately, denial by many people involved has led to a ridiculously low diagnosis rate, making it even harder for diagnosed celiacs to find the support and community that is so helpful in coping with the necessary change in lifestyle.

Reba32 Rookie

any restaurant has the option to refuse service to anyone for any reason at all, including not being able to ensure you a safe dining experience, or even if they just don't like the t-shirt you're wearing. I don't see a problem with that at all. I'd rather that they admit they can't accomodate you than have them try and fail and make me sick.

mommida Enthusiast

any restaurant has the option to refuse service to anyone for any reason at all, including not being able to ensure you a safe dining experience, or even if they just don't like the t-shirt you're wearing. I don't see a problem with that at all. I'd rather that they admit they can't accomodate you than have them try and fail and make me sick.

I think if a restaurant refused to serve someone based on the fact they are FAT, the restaurant would get sued.

So we are just too quick to threaten lawsuit.

organicmama Contributor

I really like the disability angle. Why should we be ostracized in restaurants due to something we can't control? It's not more profitable to have ADA parking spaces, restrooms, and other accommodations. However, in my opinion, it's the upstanding thing to do.

RacerX35 Rookie

I like restaurants that do try and accomodate as well as they can. They tell you that they cannot garantee that the products are completely gluten free. I recently went to a japanese steak house and asked if they had a gluten free menu. They did not, but one of the cooks was right there and said that they did have gluten free soy sauce and that they could cook my food seperately on "clean" cook ware. When we sat down and started making orders, I asked the ladies if they had the gluten free soy sauce to bring to the table. This was funny as they didn't speak clear english and I finally said "Wheat" which they did understand. They made my food seperate in the kitchen since the regular cooking surface is completely covered in gluten. I had an enjoyable time with friends and even got to enjoy some sushi with the gluten free soy sauce. The local pizza place that makes gluten free pizza always calls me when I make a online order to let me know that they still cannot garantee that the sausage stuffed mushrooms are gluten free, but the pizza is. It's great to order delivery pizza along with the rest of the family. If I had to do with the disability angle, I have that covered on two side since I am also epileptic. lol :P

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,989
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cappynan
    Newest Member
    Cappynan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...