Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Vitamin D Deficiency--Poll


PainfulSpaghetti

Recommended Posts

cahill Collaborator

I take 50,000 IU weekly, + 2000 daily and I am out side a minimum of 45 min a day and my vitamin D is FINALLY up to 28


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



color-me-confused Explorer

Tested at 15, 8 weeks of 50,000 weekly and 2000 daily, along with only sunscreening my face, got me to 27. Now on 1000 daily.

Reba32 Rookie

I had all my vitimin and mineral levels tested after my Celiac dx, and everything was deficient. Everything, not just D (though that one seems to be the fashionable one to test most commonly these days, there are several other very important vits and minerals that should be tested).

Even with mega-doses of supplements, while your villi are healing, you'll probably still be low or deficient because of continuing malabsorption issues. I've read it can take as long as 5 years to fully heal, IF you don't get glutened.

I've been gluten-free since Dec. 2009, and I go for my physical next month, so will have all my vitimin and mineral levels tested. I'm hoping they're up a bit from last time, but I'm not expecting anything miraculous just yet. ;)

tennisman Contributor

Mine is low , it started to go up than stopped going up . I take sometimes quadruple my dose and it does nothing :S

akceliac Newbie

I too was dx with D deficiency, but only after 11 years of bone pain and other side effects due to other serious vitamin and mineral deficiencies which were not even considered by the local medical community until I presented with life threatening symptoms.

As a last ditch effort to "get me out of the office", the doctor finally tested my Vit D levels. The total D2 & D3 was 12. At first she said to take 400 IU daily. After consulting with her colleagues she wrote a prescription for oral D2 at 16,000 IU daily for three months.

I couldn't afford the over $100/week cost of the Rx, so I researched the internet for Vit D deficiencies and found that D3 is the most effective form to take and I started taking 10,000 IU daily. It's very inexpensive to purchase OTC. My numbers finally increased to 75. The Rheumatologist wants to see 80.

Most doctors assume that I'm going to overdose on Vit D3 because I take larger than AMA recommended doses; but it's been 4 years since I started taking the Vit D3 supplementation and my numbers are still between 65-75 and my bones are no longer hurting.

PainfulSpaghetti Newbie

Again, Thank you all so much for your replies. It's always heartbreaking to learn that so many of us struggle, but at least we aren't alone!

thleensd Enthusiast

Yup. Was 18 and falling (no one told me until an observant doc looked back at the numbers months later), went on 50K for 6 weeks-brought to 59, supplemented at 2k/day, dropped to 46 (still normal, but didn't like the direction), now I take 5k multiple times per week (3-6) and I seem to be holding pretty steady: 56. Consider looking into taking magnesium with the D.

Now if I could only get my iron stable...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



PainfulSpaghetti Newbie

Now if I could only get my iron stable...

Nor-TX Enthusiast

My Vit D stays in the mid 20s even though I take 5,000 a day and I get 200 mg of Venofer every 5 weeks with my Remicade infusion. Iron levels are improving slowly...

AVR1962 Collaborator

I am curious as to how many of us have Vitamin D defiencies. Mine was severe, and I struggle to raise my count, and have been all year. Anyone else?

Yes, caused me all kinds of trouble.

Sarah Alli Apprentice

I was tested for vitamin D deficiency when all this first started, it was quite low. But everyone that I know that's been tested was low- I think it's baseline, especially in Alaska where I was living at the time.

I was retested about two months after gluten-free, now within normal limits! Still on the low end, but it's a victory for sure. Just need to get my iron up, now.

Lori2 Contributor

It has taken me four years to get my vitamin D levels up to mid-range taking 5,000 units a day plus an extra 50,000 weekly. I've just been gluten free since January.

mushroom Proficient

I just gave hub a wakeup kick. He has osteopenia and has (supposedly) been taking calcium and magnesium along with 50,000 units D and I made him get retested for D - his level was only 30 :o He said well that was normal. I told him if he were one point lower he would be insufficient, that he needs LOTS of D, like 70 or 80. He was all, like, HUH??? Exasperation!!!!!

Cattknap Rookie

Vitamin D, Iron and thyroid - all very low because of celiac.....but all things that will improve or become normal as I remain gluten free,

watata Apprentice

I was diagnosed by my cardiologist in March. My level was 13. Put on 50000 a week , after 4 months went up to 26 , moved up to 50000 every 5 days and now at 48. Diagnosed with Celiac 5 days ago. Vit B12 is low edge of normal, magnesium ok, they didn't test folic acid and iron is right at 12. was 8 last august. Crazy, but will keep an eye on it all.

JoshB Apprentice

38 which counts as sufficient, they say. I drink a good bit of milk, try to get some sun and take some supplements (just over the counter).

Worth noting that Wikipedia says 30~50 is the desired range, and that anything over 50 doesn't provide increased benefit and is in fact a little risky.

domesticactivist Collaborator

We take fermented cod liver oil from green pastures. It is the most nutitional available source.

T.H. Community Regular

My vitamin D levels were low and continued dropping for a year when I was on the gluten-free diet, even though I am outside in the sun quite a bit on a daily basis. I reacted to all the vitamin D supplements, as well as all food that is vitamin D supplemented, so I was pretty worried where this was going to lead.

Then I got rid of as much gluten cc as I possibly could, even that which is allowed in gluten-free products (my only processed food right now is oil, salt, and one whole grain), and after a year of that, my vitamin D levels are up to high-normal levels. Very happy that this is now the case, phew!

jemms Apprentice

mine was very low and I now take liquid Vitamin D...no wonder I was feeling so depressed and overall sluggish...

  • 2 weeks later...
anabananakins Explorer

I was diagnosed with Vit D deficiency a year ago July... 22 with a reference range of 51-140. I used to feel like death warmed up. Retested in July and I was 107 - woot! I think I take 3000 a day (it's three pills anyway).

I live in Sydney, Australia too - you'd think I'd be getting enough sunshine. I don't go and lie in the sun, but just walking to the bus stop in the morning, and walking up the street a few times a week at lunch time gets me enough sun to tan my face arms and feet. Nope. Craziness. I don't know how people going through long dark winters have any vit D at all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yeah, you may not have been consuming enough gluten to result in valid testing.
    • Kiwifruit
      Thank you for your reply. I was having about 2 slices of bread a day and other incidental gluten (occasional crackers and baked goods) so not reduced from my normal but not the 6 slices of bread like I’ve now seen suggested somewhere.
    • Sking
      I just received my lab results from the endoscopy/biopsies to see if I have Celiac. My doctor's office said it could take up to two weeks for the doctor to read the results and contact me to interpret them. I am wondering if anyone can help me to understand my results? On one hand, it seems like maybe I don't have it, but have something called Brunner Glands Hyperplasia, on the other hand it says I have increased lymphocytes and villous distortion. I am very confused. How will the doctor decide if I do or don't have it? I am so confused about all of this from the start of the journey a year ago, I really appreciate people's time on here reading this and helping me understand. Thank you.   Anatomic Pathology Report Test Current Result and Flag Previous Result and Date Units Reference Interval Diagnosis synopsis: 01 Part 1-Gastric ,Upper GI Polyp(s), Excision, Stomach: PARIETAL CELL HYPERPLASIA IDENTIFIED. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. Part 2-Duodenum ,Duodenum Biopsy: DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH NO DIAGNOSTIC ABNORMALITIES. NO EVIDENCE OF CELIAC DISEASE. NEGATIVE FOR GIARDIA, OTHER PARASITES OR OTHER PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS. NEGATIVE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA OR MALIGNANCY. Part 3-Bulb,Duodenum Biopsy: DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH INCREASED INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES AND VILLOUS DISTORTION. SEE COMMENT. Specimen: 01 Part 1-Gastric ,Upper GI Polyp(s), Excision, Stomach Part 2-Duodenum ,Duodenum Biopsy Part 3-Bulb,Duodenum Biopsy Endoscopic findings: 01 Part 1-Polyp Part 2- Part 3- Clinical diagnosis: 01 Part 1- Part 2-R/O Celiac Sprue Part 3-R/O Celiac Sprue Diagnosis: 01 Part 1-PARIETAL CELL HYPERPLASIA IDENTIFIED. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. Part 2-DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH NO DIAGNOSTIC ABNORMALITIES. NO EVIDENCE OF CELIAC DISEASE. NEGATIVE FOR GIARDIA, OTHER PARASITES OR OTHER PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS. NEGATIVE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA OR MALIGNANCY. Part 3-DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH INCREASED INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES AND VILLOUS DISTORTION. SEE COMMENT. Comment: 01 Part 1- Part 2- Part 3- Villous distortion could be due to Brunner glands hyperplasia and not truly associated with celiac disease. Please see the diagnosis of Jar 2. Recommend clinical correlation. Anatomic Pathology Report (Cont.) Part 1-There is parietal cell hyperplasia with enlargement and dilatation of the lumens of some oxyntic glands. No dysplasia is seen. Part 2-Duodenal mucosa shows preserved villous architecture and normal cellularity of the lamina propria. Brunner glands are identified. No gastric metaplasia is seen. No dysplasia or malignancy is identified. There are no viral inclusions. No Giardia, other parasites or other pathogenic organisms are seen. No Helicobacter pylori organisms are identified. Part 3-Increased numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes are noted (>6 lymphocytes/20 enterocytes at villous tips). Duodenal mucosa also shows villous distortion and slightly increased cellularity of the lamina propria. Brunner glands are hyperplastic. Gross description: 01 Part 1-The specimen is received in formalin labeled "KING, SHOSHANNA, Gastric Polyp ". Received are 2 fragments of tan, soft, tissue measuring 0.4 x 0.3 x 0.1 cm to 0.3 x 0.2 x 0.1 cm. The specimen is submitted entirely in cassette 1. Part 2-The specimen is received in formalin labeled "KING, SHOSHANNA, Duodenum Bx ". Received are multiple fragments of tan, soft, tissue measuring 0.5 x 0.2 x 0.2 cm to 0.1 x 0.1 x 0.1 cm. The specimen is submitted entirely in cassettes 1-2. Minute fragment(s) may not survive processing.  
    • susan connolly
      Thank you !  what would I do without this forum !  And all the gluten-free help  I  made this myself and was soooo careful.  But you r probably right.   ty for taking the time to post  😇💐 susan 
    • Scott Adams
      This is another study that dispels the myth that glyphosate is safe: "Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment-wide association study": https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35572 
×
×
  • Create New...