Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With My Blood Test Results


Nizzy

Recommended Posts

Nizzy Newbie

My test results came in today and I'm a bit confused.

TTG Antibody, IgA: <1 Interpretation: Negative

TTG Antibody, IgG: 10.0 U/ml

I'm already scheduled for a biopsy because the nurse said it is a good sign of celiac, but could someone please explain what this means - the nurse didn't explain it very well?

I have read a few things that say some people don't produce the IgA antibody but could produce the IgG antibody instead.

Has anyone had similar results? If so, did you test positive in your biopsy?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JoshB Apprentice

Unfortunately different labs use different methods and reporting ranges, so absolute numbers like that aren't very helpful. As I understand it "IgA" indicates gluten antibodies. These do not prove or disprove celiac trouble, they are just suggestive. You can have false positives for a number of reasons, and you can have a false negative if your immune system is doing strange things. "IgG" tracks gluten associated antibodies against the yourself. Generally a positive test here indicates celiac disease. A negative IgG doesn't necessarily mean anything as the test is not all that sensitive.

Hard to say without knowing the ranges on your test how "positive" your IgG was.

I rejected doing the biopsy as it seemed to me that they'd already tested positive in a way that was known to be accurate. I figure the biopsy is expensive, dangerous, time-consuming, and not very accurate at all, so what's the point? But... I had very high positives on all the blood work. If my blood work wasn't clear, I'd probably want a second way to test.

Ask your doctor for clarification. He should be able to tell you what your tests mean and why he wants to do the endoscopy. If he's not real clear I wouldn't be afraid to ask for a referral to a specialist.

Roda Rising Star

Some people have an IgA deficiency which will render any IgA based testing invalid. Did they do a total IgA?

Nizzy Newbie

Some people have an IgA deficiency which will render any IgA based testing invalid. Did they do a total IgA?

I am unsure if they did a total IgA. I'm pretty new to this and when I went into the doctor I barely knew what celiac disease was. I know they took a bunch of different blood tests - my thyroid, ect. And I was told by the nurse that everything looked normal minus the TTG IgG test.

Then I recieved a short note from my doctor in the mail that said exactly above and that I needed to schedule a f/u with him.

I should call and ask them to send my total blood work sent to me...Maybe it would look a little different?

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

I am unsure if they did a total IgA. I'm pretty new to this and when I went into the doctor I barely knew what celiac disease was. I know they took a bunch of different blood tests - my thyroid, ect. And I was told by the nurse that everything looked normal minus the TTG IgG test.

Then I recieved a short note from my doctor in the mail that said exactly above and that I needed to schedule a f/u with him.

I should call and ask them to send my total blood work sent to me...Maybe it would look a little different?

You could request all of your test results (it's good to have all of the info). Regardless, you need to have further investigation (like a scope) to rule in/out celiac. You tested positive for an antibody to an enzyme that is being made in response to gluten that causes tissue damage to your small intestines (tTG). This test is sensitive, but it's not very specific, meaning that it can be positive due to other conditions like diabetes, heart failure, Crohn's disease and liver disease.

As far as antibody classes goes, there are 5 types that everybody has as part of their immune system: IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, and IgD. Each class of antibodies is associated with different immune responses in the body. When testing for Celiac Disease, we are primarily looking for antibodies of the IgA class, because they are typically associated with the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. The problem with just testing tTG IgA class when doing a Celiac screen, is that IgA antibodies can be decreased in malabsorbtion disorders like Celiac! In which case the tTG (IgA) would be negative, and the Celiac disease diagnosis would be missed entirely. That is why we do a total IgA measurement, to make sure that the patient is not IgA deficient. If they are, then the IgG antibody class is tested against tTG. The IgG antibody is the most abundant class of antibodies in the body, and the patient would have to be severely malnourished to give a "false" negative IgG result for Celiac.

It looks like your doctor ordered the Celiac screen that tests for both IgG and IgA tTG antibodies. The lab my doc uses only does the IgA class, but then also does a total IgA to make sure there is no deficiency. It really depends on the lab and the doctor, as there really is no set standard for what exactly should be in a Celiac screen (unfortunately).

Sorry if this got WAY over the top! I am a med tech and I worked in an immunology lab for 9 years. ;) If anybody really wants to go crazy, here is a link about antibodies (scroll to the last part of the article, where it talks about the 5 types and what they are associated with). WARNING, your head may explode! :blink:

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...