Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Hate The Word "disease"

divamomma

Recommended Posts

divamomma Enthusiast
divamomma
Posted

I was very annoyed and disappointed yesterday at the library. I was looking for Dana Korn's book regarding children and celiac disease. The aisle where it was located had a big sign above it that said "DISEASES". I felt awful. It should not be labelled as a "disease" and I really hate the whole term "celiac disease". I usually just call it celiac but why can't they rename it?? I am glad my daughter who was with me can't read that well yet! Just needed to vent.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


jjchenoa Rookie
jjchenoa
Posted

I was very annoyed and disappointed yesterday at the library. I was looking for Dana Korn's book regarding children and celiac disease. The aisle where it was located had a big sign above it that said "DISEASES". I felt awful. It should not be labelled as a "disease" and I really hate the whole term "celiac disease". I usually just call it celiac but why can't they rename it?? I am glad my daughter who was with me can't read that well yet! Just needed to vent.

In my book dis-ease is a perfect description! ;) I think the word has bad connotations that bring up all kinds of preconceived notions but it just means an organ that doesn't function properly or a condition that gets in the way of proper function. Our kids probably make less of a deal about the facts than how we as their parents react to the facts so if you explained the meaning to her she would probably shrug and accept what you tell her. I bet most people have or will have one disease or another.

bartfull Rising Star
bartfull
Posted

Back in the mid 80's when Mom was diagnosed, it was called Celiac SYNDROME. I'll have to look it up...

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted

I was very annoyed and disappointed yesterday at the library. I was looking for Dana Korn's book regarding children and celiac disease. The aisle where it was located had a big sign above it that said "DISEASES". I felt awful. It should not be labelled as a "disease" and I really hate the whole term "celiac disease". I usually just call it celiac but why can't they rename it?? I am glad my daughter who was with me can't read that well yet! Just needed to vent.

I couldn't agree more! This is one disease that a person has control over and you can turn it around 100%,without meds. How many other issues can that be said about? I do not lump Celiac under the same category as cancer or other problems which you don't have as much control over and requires difficult treatment to survive. I think it's a more positive attitude towards the whole thing.

Sarah Alli Apprentice
Sarah Alli
Posted

I had pretty severe asthma- unquestionably a disease- growing up. It never bothered me or made me feel inferior, it was almost a badge of pride for some reason. I had my special inhalers and breathing machines and could leave class to go to the nurse whenever I wanted!

I think you underestimate your daughter. She'll do just fine. After all, a disease is only abnormal functioning... and we're all a little abnormal.

Takala Enthusiast
Takala
Posted

It is an auto immune disease. There are trolls all over the media trying to pretend that it's a fad and a neurotic response to anxiety. They might be said to be having another sort of malfunction. I'd rather have this one than theirs.

Reba32 Rookie
Reba32
Posted

call it anything less than a disease and people will treat it as nothing more important than acne, or a sprained ankle. Say "disease" and people will take it a little more seriously when you say you can't eat gluten. Call it a "syndrome" and it's somehow not life threatening anymore. Celiac *is* life threatening, and very worthy of the moniker "disease".

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


soulsister Newbie
soulsister
Posted

call it anything less than a disease and people will treat it as nothing more important than acne, or a sprained ankle. Say "disease" and people will take it a little more seriously when you say you can't eat gluten. Call it a "syndrome" and it's somehow not life threatening anymore. Celiac *is* life threatening, and very worthy of the moniker "disease".

I agree, when I recently told my friend that I had received the diagnosis of "Celiac" her response was .." oh, that's gluten sensitivity....that's no big deal". I told her hit is an auto immune disease, very serious and if I went much longer misdiagnosed, the result could have been potentially lethal. I only knew this because I immediately began researching Celiac once I got the biopsy results...I had never even heard of Celiac before.....come to find out, I have a first cousin with this condition! I am glad it is the ranks of "dis-ease"....and I would imagine with this particular "category", teachers will pay closer attention to the specific requirements for their students (when notified).

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted

Back in the mid 80's when Mom was diagnosed, it was called Celiac SYNDROME. I'll have to look it up...

The reason some things are lumped as a syndrome and others are called diseases is because syndromes usually have symptom overlap so it can be hard to diagnose which problem you have. Many other autoimmune diseases, which are linked to Celiac, have the same symptoms as Celiac so that may be why it was once referred to as Celiac Syndrome. Sjogren's, Hashi's, Fibromyalgia, and Lupus all share symptoms and can be difficult to diagnose until symptoms become advanced. Maybe Celiac advanced to disease state when diagnostic tools made diagnosis easier and it could be defined better? I don't know but I still believe that classifying Celiac as a disease is overkill. I was deathly ill at diagnosis yet to think I completely turned things around after 3 years and all I did was go gluten free. No meds, surgery or prolonged treatment, except a dietary change. It never ceases to amaze me. I did develop other autoimmune problems along the way but they have gotten much better with each passing year gluten free.....not cured by any means but better symptom-wise.

I look at what people who are diagnosed with cancer have to go through and they still may not survive....that is far more daunting than Celiac.

Reba32 Rookie
Reba32
Posted

undiagnosed and untreated Celiac is most certainly deadly. It can kill you, just like cancer can. It's a slow and painful death for sure.

shadowicewolf Proficient
shadowicewolf
Posted

it is a disease after all (such things that can be deadly are classified as diseases).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,218
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    LinnWikman
    Newest Member
    LinnWikman
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By trents · Posted

      Scott, I know full well that celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder and gluten sensitivity is not. And I agree that there is inconsistency in the use of the terms. But my contention is that "gluten intolerance" should not be used of NCGS since "gluten sensitivity" is actually found in the gluten disorder known as Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity and, therefore, "gluten intolerance" should be reserved as a common/nonmedical equivalent for celiac disease. It also seems to me that "intolerance" implies something more severe than does "sensitive". And it just seems to me that, though there is still a lot of inconsistency in the use of these terms, there is a movement toward using "gluten intolerant" to refer to celiac disease rather than NCGS. But that is just my opinion and perhaps, to be honest, a bit of a personal crusade. Actually, we would all be better off if we quit using the those informal terms "intolerance" and "sensitivity" and just speak of celiac disease and NCGS.
    • Jason Dyer
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By Jason Dyer · Posted

      Wow. I mean, I REALLY don't want to give up beer, but I NEVER cheat. I get caught (glutenized in my vernacular), but I never cheat. I didn't even know that was a thing...
    • trents
      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance from it: Is salt still okay for most people?

      By trents · Posted

      I wonder why they put dextrose in it?
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      PS - Many new celiacs report that they can go gluten-free, with the exception of giving up beer. That seems to be a bridge too far from many celiacs, and may be why nearly 20% cheat on their diets:  
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      For those with celiac disease we know that there is a huge range in sensitivity, for example we've had many members here who report that even smelling wheat bread cooking in a bakery, for example a bakery in a supermarket, triggers an immediate gluten reaction that can last days or longer. Is there science to back this up--not that I've seen. Does this mean that it can't happen? Since it does seem to happen to some people, I can't say that there isn't something real happening to these folks.  Similarly there seems to be celiacs who can drink even regular beers, many of which have detectable gluten at under 20ppm, without issues, and many drink gluten reduced beers made from barley on a daily basis without issues, and without elevated antibodies or damaged villi. I also know that some celiacs report getting very sick from a single sip of gluten reduced beer. To be on the safe side it's probably best to stick with a naturally gluten-free beer, however, many of them lack the real beer taste, thus, some celiacs cheat on their diets and just drink regular beer. In this case I think having a choice is important, and drinking a gluten reduced option would be better than regular beer. 
×
×
  • Create New...