Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confusing Blood Work


marilyn

Recommended Posts

marilyn Apprentice

ABS, IGA - 8 (negative range = 0 - 19

ABS, IGG -5 (negative range = 0 - 19

ttg, IGG >100 (positive >9)

IGA 215 (normal range 70 - 400

A chart I have to figure this out says "possible" Any opinions?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JoshB Apprentice

Did you perhaps stop eating gluten before your tests? Your anti-gliadin results are somewhat low, but these tend to drop faster than other anti-bodies.

Your ttg-igg is highly suggestive of celiac disease. You should certainly talk with your doctor about it as there are a couple of other possibilities. But, yeah, you almost certainly have it. Very odd that they did ABS and that they did only the "igg" form of "ttg" rather than "iga" which is generally thought to be superior. Very strange lab.

mushroom Proficient

ABS, IGA - 8 (negative range = 0 - 19

ABS, IGG -5 (negative range = 0 - 19

ttg, IGG >100 (positive >9)

IGA 215 (normal range 70 - 400

A chart I have to figure this out says "possible" Any opinions?

There are other possible causes of a high tTG reading: (this from Wikipedia)

Antibodies to Open Original Shared Link (ATA or anti-tTG) are found in patients with several conditions, including Open Original Shared Link, Open Original Shared Link,Open Original Shared Link Open Original Shared Link,Open Original Shared Link and various forms of Open Original Shared Link.

Thus, while celiac could be the most likely, it would also be possible to have a high reading with one of the other conditions, for example, our good old friend (NOT!) IBS. I am beginning to suspect that IBS is just one of the many forms of gluten intolerance that does not give a positive reading on the very specific celiac tests (i.e., they have not yet devised a test for it) anyway.

Your doctor may want to do a biopsy for confirmation that it is celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,386
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PamelaW
    Newest Member
    PamelaW
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...