Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

So Now What?


pain*in*my*gut

Recommended Posts

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

I got a letter in the mail today (thanks for the personal phone call...not). My biopsy results from last weeks scope were negative. I was anticipating this, as my ttg levels were normal, which pointed to no intestinal damage (yet). My GI has released me from his care, told me to follow up with my primary doc for any "further problems". :angry:

So do I have Celiac or not? For me, personally, the official dx doesn't matter, I am still going gluten free. But I have a 6 year old who has a lot of the same symptoms I have. I am afraid that without a Celiac dx for me, I won't be able to get his pediatrician to order the bloodwork screen. My GP is very supportive, but she also told me not to worry about my son unless he isn't growing properly or has "sprue". :huh: We all know that you don't have to have those symptoms to have issues with gluten!! I would just make him gluten free, but I would need some kind of "proof" for family and school to comply with the diet.

I am suprised at how dissapointed I am to have normal test results! I should be happy, but now I feel like it's going to be an uphill battle to get anybody to take this seriously! :( Is there any way to get a Celiac dx without a positive biopsy?? Don't get me wrong, I don't WANT this disease, but I feel like it would make things so much easier to have it on paper....


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JoshB Apprentice

You had a positive DGP, right?

So you had a positive test which has a 95% specificity rating (and probably only that low because they haven't done 12/24 month followup studies yet). You're comparing that to a test(biopsy) with a 15% false negative rate. I would think that this is pretty suggestive of celiac disease in the very early stages. TTG seems to be related to the extent of intestinal damage; that also backs up that hypothesis. You should be happy!

If your pediatrician doesn't want to run blood tests then you could always have it done yourself. I certainly think you'd be better off asking the doc to do it first, though.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

It would be a good idea to get a copy of the biopsy report. Some doctors for some reason don't recognize the early changes seen with celiac or want to see the villi totally destroyed before they will diagnose. False negatives are also common for various reasons. Your positive blood test is really enough to diagnose as that test is very specific for celiac. Your kids should be screened periodically even if they don't show obvious symptoms. If your present ped won't do it then find a new ped.

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

You had a positive DGP, right?

So you had a positive test which has a 95% specificity rating (and probably only that low because they haven't done 12/24 month followup studies yet). You're comparing that to a test(biopsy) with a 15% false negative rate. I would think that this is pretty suggestive of celiac disease in the very early stages. TTG seems to be related to the extent of intestinal damage; that also backs up that hypothesis. You should be happy!

If your pediatrician doesn't want to run blood tests then you could always have it done yourself. I certainly think you'd be better off asking the doc to do it first, though.

Yes, my DGP was really positive!! I also have an elevated CRP (inflamation indicator, non-specific). In 2007 after a bowel resection, I developed an obstruction due to excessive scarring and inflamation, lost 20 lbs and was pooping 20 X's a day!! They did a Celiac screen on me at that time, and it was supposedly normal. But I recently got copies of that "normal" screen, and my Anti Gliadin ABS were on the very high end of normal (my IgG was 9, with anything higher than 9 being positive). Ever since then I have been suffering with all kinds of crap (see my siggy). So, yeah, I think it's Celiac, but for whatever reason it's not attacking my small intestines enough to pick up on biopsy. It sure is attacking the rest of me, though! :(

Now if I can just convince my PCP, hubby, family, and child's peditrician that I have it.... :(

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

It would be a good idea to get a copy of the biopsy report. Some doctors for some reason don't recognize the early changes seen with celiac or want to see the villi totally destroyed before they will diagnose. False negatives are also common for various reasons. Your positive blood test is really enough to diagnose as that test is very specific for celiac. Your kids should be screened periodically even if they don't show obvious symptoms. If your present ped won't do it then find a new ped.

Yes, this is a good idea, since I have had questionable "normal" results in the past...

Thank you, Raven!

Katrala Contributor

If it were me, I wouldn't completely erase the possibility of celiac, but I also wouldn't stop looking for an answer, either.

You don't have to have celiac in order to have a gluten sensitivity. Gluten may very well be the cause of your problems and a gluten-free diet may help even if it's not celiac.

What about any other food allergy testing?

Takala Enthusiast

Lots of us out here without the "official" diagnosis.

Yeah, they want to see you 3/4's dead and strung out on every medication before they'd acknowledge that something could be causing this.

You're seriously trending celiac/gluten intolerant with those symptoms, genetics and blood tests already.

If you feel better off of gluten, don't eat it. Your household, perfectly reasonable to insist on the rest of them cooperating to keep you from getting cross contaminated.

p.s. edited to add that I have the neurological complications, and even a brain scan showing lesions, combined with my dramatic response to a strict diet, still didn't impress upon a neurologist that it was a gluten problem.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes, my DGP was really positive!! I also have an elevated CRP (inflamation indicator, non-specific). In 2007 after a bowel resection, I developed an obstruction due to excessive scarring and inflamation, lost 20 lbs and was pooping 20 X's a day!! They did a Celiac screen on me at that time, and it was supposedly normal. But I recently got copies of that "normal" screen, and my Anti Gliadin ABS were on the very high end of normal (my IgG was 9, with anything higher than 9 being positive). Ever since then I have been suffering with all kinds of crap (see my siggy). So, yeah, I think it's Celiac, but for whatever reason it's not attacking my small intestines enough to pick up on biopsy. It sure is attacking the rest of me, though! :(

Now if I can just convince my PCP, hubby, family, and child's peditrician that I have it.... :(

Your damage may be patchy and a damaged area was missed. With your positive blood work, positive for the genes and recovery on the diet that may be enough to convince the doubters.

Reba32 Rookie

had you been gluten-free for a while before you went for the biopsy?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,993
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Celly
    Newest Member
    Celly
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...