Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dq-Testing Services


JoshB

Recommended Posts

JoshB Apprentice

So, there's a lively discussion going on another topic, and one of the questions there revolves around what "DQ" testing provides. My previous assumption was that DQ testing worked pretty well, and that it gave you a specific fix on your DQ type. We have another assertion, though, that DQ tests sometimes only tell you whether DQ2.5 or DQ8 was found. If true, this would be totally inadequate for celiac disease screening.

So, what services have people used to determine their DQ types? What sort of results did you get back?

I've used 23andme, and they told me I was homogeneous for DQ2.5. I believe with more work (looking up variations yourself in a public database) that it should be possible to determine most if not all DQ variations. The cost is $99 up front and I think $5/month; you're forced to sign up for twelve months.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

So, there's a lively discussion going on another topic, and one of the questions there revolves around what "DQ" testing provides. My previous assumption was that DQ testing worked pretty well, and that it gave you a specific fix on your DQ type. We have another assertion, though, that DQ tests sometimes only tell you whether DQ2.5 or DQ8 was found. If true, this would be totally inadequate for celiac disease screening.

So, what services have people used to determine their DQ types? What sort of results did you get back?

I've used 23andme, and they told me I was homogeneous for DQ2.5. I believe with more work (looking up variations yourself in a public database) that it should be possible to determine most if not all DQ variations. The cost is $99 up front and I think $5/month; you're forced to sign up for twelve months.

My doc used LabCorp, and I got a "you are positive for HLA DQ2 and negative for HLA DQ8". That's it. Plus, I had to ask her for the gene tests...she wasn't even going to order them and my GI doc didn't even care what they said.

I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but the fact is, Josh, that most people really don't care what their genes are, they just want desperately to feel better. Most people don't have the money and/or knowledge to carry on extensive genetic research about their condition. Doctors just want to push pills and collect your co-pays and send you on your merry way. They don't care about mapping genes and finding cures (unless they are in research, which we all know there is very little of for Celiac disease and non-Celiac gluten-intolerance). Only big pharmaceutical companies care about that stuff, and since there is no drug fix for Celiac disease, we are screwed. :(

JoshB Apprentice

OK, so Labcorp does not seem as useful as one might hope. Better than I feared though, as there is some suggestion that there are tests which won't tell you if you're 2.2, only 2.5. Knowing only "2" is not as useful as 2.5/2.2, but at least it's better than not spotting 2.2 at all. I'd be really interested in hearing from anyone about what a "negative" result looks like from them. Also, has anyone ever gotten a DQ7.5 result? It seems pretty useless if they don't identify 7.5

JoshB Apprentice

I've been completely unable to find a LabCorp DQ test sample, but I did find one for Quest:

Open Original Shared Link

-----------------------------------------

So it seems that if you're using Quest you can determine your DQ type, not just whether it is 2 or 8.

I think it's worth noting that it doesn't just tell you, however. You have to look up what your "A" and "B" values mean for yourself. I'm certain that my GP would not have known what to make of this, and that if it came back and didn't say "DQ2" but did have sub-types for DQ7.5 that he would have missed it and said it was impossible for me to have celiac disease.

So my take-away would be to use Quest for now if you have the option, and to be sure to get a copy of the test for yourself.

I'm pretty disturbed that these tests aren't better. I'm thinking that if I asked someone from a testing-company about it they'd say "Yeah, but it's pretty good. This is going to be correct for 97% of cases!" -- That, frankly, is nowhere near good enough. Three percent of the celiac-positive people taking a DQ test that doesn't report your sub-types are going to be told "Nope. Not you", essentially sentencing them to die by lymphoma.

melissa222 Newbie

I'm still waiting on my genetic test results, done through Prometheus. I'm a bit skeptical only because on the paperwork they indicate the test is for DQ2/DQ8, but I don't have the results so I'm not sure what it is going to look like. Prometheus and the GI doctor I saw were both recommended by the local celiac support group. Additionally, they informed me that LabCorp was not a reliable celiac testing lab. Maybe it depends on the area you live in, I can't really say.

I am very interested in whether I carry the genes because I have children, and one day will have grandchildren, therefore this gene is of significant importance to me, as I'm sure it is to many other people. A few hundred dollars give or take is a small price to pay considering what's at stake. If one of my children does not have the gene I won't have to be as concerned with celiac, or the other way around. I feel it's a very small price to pay for that knowledge that could save the lives of my children and the generations that follow. I'm sure other parents, particularly with small children, would feel the same.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I'm still waiting on my genetic test results, done through Prometheus. I'm a bit skeptical only because on the paperwork they indicate the test is for DQ2/DQ8, but I don't have the results so I'm not sure what it is going to look like. Prometheus and the GI doctor I saw were both recommended by the local celiac support group. Additionally, they informed me that LabCorp was not a reliable celiac testing lab. Maybe it depends on the area you live in, I can't really say.

I am very interested in whether I carry the genes because I have children, and one day will have grandchildren, therefore this gene is of significant importance to me, as I'm sure it is to many other people. A few hundred dollars give or take is a small price to pay considering what's at stake. If one of my children does not have the gene I won't have to be as concerned with celiac, or the other way around. I feel it's a very small price to pay for that knowledge that could save the lives of my children and the generations that follow. I'm sure other parents, particularly with small children, would feel the same.

Please be aware that there are other genes associated with celiac. Just because you don't have DQ2 or DQ8 doesn't mean you can't have celiac and pass the associated genes on to your children.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...