Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Processed Foods


GFreeMO

Recommended Posts

GFreeMO Proficient

Lets say for instance that you eat some gluten free bread for breakfast then later on you have some gluten free cookies and than later a gluten free doughnut and so on.......Can it add up and cause someone to be glutened?

I know that the companies like Udi, kinninnick, Enjoy Life etc. test to certain levels but can the levels add up to be enough to make a super sensitive feel sick?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Lets say for instance that you eat some gluten free bread for breakfast then later on you have some gluten free cookies and than later a gluten free doughnut and so on.......Can it add up and cause someone to be glutened?

I know that the companies like Udi, kinninnick, Enjoy Life etc. test to certain levels but can the levels add up to be enough to make a super sensitive feel sick?

In my experience, yes it can.

psawyer Proficient

This question is a logical outgrowth of the endless ppm debate.

The ppm is just a measuring tool. All that really matters is the total quantity of actual gluten consumed per day. It needs to be small enough that your healing process remains faster than the damage rate.

The trouble is, you never really know how much gluten is in something. It may be tested for 10 ppm, so you know it is less than that. It could very well be zero--you just can't prove that.

Even assuming the worst case, which is that the product contains almost enough to be detected by the test, serving size matters. A single vitamin tablet with 20 ppm contains far less total gluten than a slice of gluten-free bread at 5 ppm.

Much as we wish for it, there is not a simple answer.

dilettantesteph Collaborator

Lets say for instance that you eat some gluten free bread for breakfast then later on you have some gluten free cookies and than later a gluten free doughnut and so on.......Can it add up and cause someone to be glutened?

The study done by Fasano to determine safe gluten amounts looked at amount of gluten per day. Ppm amounts are concentrations. Concentration times amount eaten will give you amount of gluten consumed per day.

It definitely will add up, even for someone who isn't super sensitive.

T.H. Community Regular

...Can it add up and cause someone to be glutened?

I know that the companies like Udi, kinninnick, Enjoy Life etc. test to certain levels but can the levels add up to be enough to make a super sensitive feel sick?

Oh heck yeah, it most definitely can. I think it can be a challenge to avoid, as a super sensitive especially, because of the differences in gluten concentration in our foods. Products that are much lower than their maximum allowed ppm, those that are close to the maximum ppm, and a number of the 'naturally' gluten-free foods that end up being over the 20 ppm mark, too.

Open Original Shared Link is a recent study to try and determine the gluten threshold of celiacs. Dr. Fassano was one of the researchers involved. They had three groups, one challenged with 50 mg of gluten a day, one with 10 mg a day, and one with a placebo. Aside from the amount given to participants by the researchers, they "estimated that the background gluten intake from the GFD followed by our patients during the microchallenge study was <5 mg/d."

At the end of the study, the researchers concluded that 50 mg caused damage, but 10 mg daily was good, except for one member of the study. "One patient (challenged with 10 mg gluten) developed a clinical relapse." They didn't determine where safe levels of gluten ended and damaging levels began, for everyone else.

So, here we have at least one celiac who was witnessed reacting to 10 mg of gluten a day, when monitored by medical professionals.

It's pretty easy to calculate out whether it's possible to consume that much in a day, yeah? Admittedly, it's going to be an estimate, because we don't have hard data on what the concentration actually is, we only have the maximum potential gluten concentration. But, we've got to work with what we've got, at this point.

I took these numbers off of some gluten-free products that are common enough to be found in my local grocery store.

For <20 ppm products:

2 gluten-free waffles are 85 g

1 serving gluten-free canned chili with beans is 247 g

1 gluten-free frozen dinner is 292 g

Let's say you just ate this, no gluten-free bread or crackers or cookies or salad with gluten-free salad dressing, etc...

I convert the g to kg, so: .085+.247+.292=0.624 kg eaten.

Multiply it by the ppm(mg/kg): 20*0.624= 12.48 mg of gluten

This is likely not going to be the amount actually consumed because, again, many products are going to be a lower concentration than the maximum amount of gluten allowed. But this amount is possible, and that with just three products, nothing else.

For the gentleman mentioned in the study above, even the extra 10 mg of gluten a day was too much, right? So these three products could obviously be too much for him, if the levels are close to the maximum allowed gluten. The waffles alone would be fine, but after that, he starts running a higher risk of getting close to his 'threshold.'

I know that a lot of people would say that the gluten levels are likely much lower than the maximum concentration, so this wouldn't be an issue. Sometimes, that's true. Sometimes, it's not, and the product is close to the maximum allowed ppm. Then there's those 'naturally' gluten-free foods I mentioned. Some of those are much higher, like the one soy flour that Open Original Shared Link.

A biscuit is around 50g. If you had only 1/10 of the biscuit as soy flour, at 5 grams, just that soy flour alone is over 14 mg of gluten, once again over that 10 mg mark.

So basically, how sensitive we are, how clean our gluten-free products are, and how much of them we eat, is going to make all the difference in whether we react or not.

All numbers aside, on a personal front, we have to be quite careful with my daughter. With most of the 10 ppm products, she can have one very small serving a day and is usually fine. If she tries more than one, even later in the day, she's typically clutching her stomach in pain by the end of the day.

We've tried this with various combinations of products (on days when we're home, so we can eliminate potential cc while we're out), and there's been a definite correlation between pain and how much gluten she's likely ingested by the end of the day. Even sometimes having one product at night and one first thing in the morning is too close together and she'll have trouble.

At this point, we've just dropped the processed foods for the most part, and then every once in a while as a treat - or if we're desperate while out and about - she can have something processed.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,025
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    toyatang
    Newest Member
    toyatang
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...