Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Don't Understand "borderline Celiac"

NCM

Recommended Posts

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted
  • Author

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

I have a VERY supportive husband who insists on the house being gluten free. While everyone has been having their turn at a biopsy we have had it half gluten and half gluten free which has been stressful. Now that it's completely gluten free it's a lot easier. This doctor has really good credentials and is considered very knowledgeable with Celiac Disease. We did get the feeling that he wanted to study my son if he stayed on gluten. We asked him if the inflammation would get better if he stayed on gluten and he said no and I said "but it will get worse right?" and his response was "it wouldn't be wrong to agree with you" WHAT??? I asked him why would we keep him on gluten and he said that some people choose to in these circumstances because the diet is inconvenient if there's only one person in the house on it. Since when is making sure your kid is healthy an inconvenience???? Don't get me wrong the diet can be challenging at times (I've been on it for 3 months now) but I don't want to see him sick!

Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

That doctors ethics worry me. It sounds like your family may be his guinea pigs.

Borderline celiac is like a little bit pregnant. Not possible.

anna34 Enthusiast
anna34
Posted

Ugh! The whole "borderline" thing irritates me too. My test was borderline and I was told I could try the diet "if I want to" and wasn't given any other direction. Well, within 24 hours on the diet, I got my answer and haven't looked back. I don't understand why they are so hesitant to encourage a trial of the diet. It's like saying "keep doing what you're doing and we'll see if you get sicker/sick enough to test positive". :blink:

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

In the old days they demanded total villous atrophy, hence this looks borderline to them.

Just google what the well-known finnish celiac researcher M

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. MogwaiStripe
      - MogwaiStripe posted a topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      0

      Dermatitis Herpetiformis Cleared up With EpiPen, etc.

      I had to rush to the hospital last week due to anaphylactic shock from taking a dose of an antibiotic. Received EpiPen, steroids, antihistamines, zofran (all injected/IV). When I woke up the next day, ALL of the rashes I've had that started since going gluten free were cleared up. EVEN THE dermatitis herpetiformis was gone. Has anyone else experienced this...
    2. Dr. Gunn
      - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual.
    3. trents
      - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population...
    4. Dr. Gunn
      - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life.
    5. Aretaeus Cappadocia
      - Aretaeus Cappadocia commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      1

      How Social Media Algorithms Are Fueling Gluten Anxiety: TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram Trends

      Good, balanced analysis. I liked the comparison of the different platforms in this context. Fwiw, the same essay largely would work if you substitute any of many contemporary topics. As a moderator of this site, have you stepped back and considered how this site fits into this essay? Personally, I don't think I have enough visibility into the comments...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,661
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Penny W
    Newest Member
    Penny W
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • MogwaiStripe
      Dermatitis Herpetiformis Cleared up With EpiPen, etc.

      By MogwaiStripe · Posted

      I had to rush to the hospital last week due to anaphylactic shock from taking a dose of an antibiotic. Received EpiPen, steroids, antihistamines, zofran (all injected/IV). When I woke up the next day, ALL of the rashes I've had that started since going gluten free were cleared up. EVEN THE dermatitis herpetiformis was gone. Has anyone else experienced this or happen to know why that would happen? The meds they gave me were all meds that I've taken to try to resolve the rashes, but they never worked in pill form. I'm wondering if it the addition of the epi that helped, it if injected steroids and antihistamines were what did the job.
    • Dr. Gunn
      Test interpretations

      By Dr. Gunn · Posted

      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual. 
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. It remains latent until triggered by some stress event which may or may not occur. So, there is a genetic component to celiac disease but there is also an epigenetic component. 
    • Dr. Gunn
      Test interpretations

      By Dr. Gunn · Posted

      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life. 
    • Scott Adams
      Test interpretations

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.