Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Don't Understand "borderline Celiac"


NCM

Recommended Posts

NCM Newbie

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sa1937 Community Regular

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

NCM Newbie

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

I have a VERY supportive husband who insists on the house being gluten free. While everyone has been having their turn at a biopsy we have had it half gluten and half gluten free which has been stressful. Now that it's completely gluten free it's a lot easier. This doctor has really good credentials and is considered very knowledgeable with Celiac Disease. We did get the feeling that he wanted to study my son if he stayed on gluten. We asked him if the inflammation would get better if he stayed on gluten and he said no and I said "but it will get worse right?" and his response was "it wouldn't be wrong to agree with you" WHAT??? I asked him why would we keep him on gluten and he said that some people choose to in these circumstances because the diet is inconvenient if there's only one person in the house on it. Since when is making sure your kid is healthy an inconvenience???? Don't get me wrong the diet can be challenging at times (I've been on it for 3 months now) but I don't want to see him sick!

Jenniferxgfx Contributor

That doctors ethics worry me. It sounds like your family may be his guinea pigs.

Borderline celiac is like a little bit pregnant. Not possible.

anna34 Enthusiast

Ugh! The whole "borderline" thing irritates me too. My test was borderline and I was told I could try the diet "if I want to" and wasn't given any other direction. Well, within 24 hours on the diet, I got my answer and haven't looked back. I don't understand why they are so hesitant to encourage a trial of the diet. It's like saying "keep doing what you're doing and we'll see if you get sicker/sick enough to test positive". :blink:

nora-n Rookie

In the old days they demanded total villous atrophy, hence this looks borderline to them.

Just google what the well-known finnish celiac researcher M

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Test interpretations

    2. - MicG posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Test interpretations

    3. - catnapt posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      how long does it take for the genetic blood test for celiac to come back?

    4. - DebD5 commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

    5. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,653
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    daweesa
    Newest Member
    daweesa
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Possibly. Your total IGA (Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum) is actually high so you are not IGA deficient. In the absence of IGA deficiency, the most reliable celiac antibody test would be the t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA for which your score is within normal range. There are other things besides celiac disease that might cause an elevated DGP-IGA (Deamidated Gliadin Abs, lgA) for which you do have a positive score. It might also be of concern that your total IGA is elevated as that can indicate some other health problems, some of which are serious.  Had you been practicing a gluten free or a reduced gluten free diet prior to the blood draw? Talk to your physician about these things. I would also seek an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel to check for damage to the villous lining, which is the gold standard diagnostic test for celiac disease.
    • MicG
      Test results as follows: Deamidated Gliadin Abs, lgA 40 H (normal range 0-19) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG 4 (0-19) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA <2 (0-3) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG <2 (0-5) Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative (Negative) Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 535 H (87-352) Do I have celiac?
    • catnapt
      how long does it take for the genetic blood test for celiac to come back? I saw the GI today, she was great. She says I def have an issue with gluten and that my symptoms align more with celiac disease than NCGS, so she's doing the genetic testing, Ordered a test for SIBO but said that's just to cover all bases, she doesn't think I have that. If the blood work comes back negative for the genes, then I will cancel the endoscopy. If positive, I will try the 2 week gluten challenge and get the endoscopy done. If I can't manage the gluten challenge (I had HORRIBLE symptoms last time and quit after 12 days) then we'll just assume it's celiac disease and go from there. She says she does a full nutrient panel on all her pts every year, that was nice to hear.I'm on so many supplements it would be nice to only have to get the ones I truly need! so yeh, really anxious about the test results for the genes!! I have an identical twin sister so I'd need to tell her if it's positive, she'd prob want to get tested too. *interesting note: when I said if the blood work comes back that I don't have the genes, then I'm in the clear - she said, well,,,,,,not necessarily. But she didn't want to go into as we had a lot to go over. I did make a  mental note of that comment and will ask her when I see her next time.   she was very thorough! I was impressed! she even checked- up on some lab work I had done that my Endo ordered. I like her, I am looking forward to seeing her again. I think I'll get some good advice and info from her she also complimented me on my diet.   said it was a very gut friendly and healthy diet 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not sure why "colonoscopy" keeps coming up for you, again it would be an endoscopy to diagnose celiac disease, but it seems that Kaiser should still have your records. If you were diagnosed by them in the 1990's using a blood test and endoscopy, then you definitely have celiac disease, and hopefully you've been gluten-free since that time. You should be able to contact Kaiser for those records.
    • Russ H
      This sounds like a GP who is ignorant regarding coeliac disease. The risk with consuming gluten for several days is that it triggers the coeliac immune response, leading to raised auto-antibodies and active disease for several months. People may not even be aware of symptoms during this process, but it is causing damage to the body. As trents has said, the gut lining normally recovers on a strict gluten-free diet, and this happens much faster in children than in adults.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.