Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Don't Understand "borderline Celiac"

NCM

Recommended Posts

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted
  • Author

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

I have a VERY supportive husband who insists on the house being gluten free. While everyone has been having their turn at a biopsy we have had it half gluten and half gluten free which has been stressful. Now that it's completely gluten free it's a lot easier. This doctor has really good credentials and is considered very knowledgeable with Celiac Disease. We did get the feeling that he wanted to study my son if he stayed on gluten. We asked him if the inflammation would get better if he stayed on gluten and he said no and I said "but it will get worse right?" and his response was "it wouldn't be wrong to agree with you" WHAT??? I asked him why would we keep him on gluten and he said that some people choose to in these circumstances because the diet is inconvenient if there's only one person in the house on it. Since when is making sure your kid is healthy an inconvenience???? Don't get me wrong the diet can be challenging at times (I've been on it for 3 months now) but I don't want to see him sick!

Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

That doctors ethics worry me. It sounds like your family may be his guinea pigs.

Borderline celiac is like a little bit pregnant. Not possible.

anna34 Enthusiast
anna34
Posted

Ugh! The whole "borderline" thing irritates me too. My test was borderline and I was told I could try the diet "if I want to" and wasn't given any other direction. Well, within 24 hours on the diet, I got my answer and haven't looked back. I don't understand why they are so hesitant to encourage a trial of the diet. It's like saying "keep doing what you're doing and we'll see if you get sicker/sick enough to test positive". :blink:

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

In the old days they demanded total villous atrophy, hence this looks borderline to them.

Just google what the well-known finnish celiac researcher M

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. DebD5
      - DebD5 commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

      Interestingly enough, while I hear you. I completely disagree. Gluten has not been 100% removed. There’s still trace amounts under the regulated amount per millions allowed. I gave only figured out in the last year, while reading chats on this site, of other celiacs still having issues and how they figured it out. If enough companies allow slight amounts o...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

      I understand why that feels frustrating, because the labeling can definitely seem confusing. In the case of products like King Arthur’s gluten-free bread flour that contain gluten-free wheat starch, the wheat starch has been specially processed to remove the gluten proteins that trigger celiac disease. Because it originates from wheat, U.S. labeling laws s...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Doctors
      7

      Second chance

      I'm not sure why "colonoscopy" keeps coming up for you, again it would be an endoscopy to diagnose celiac disease, but it seems that Kaiser should still have your records. If you were diagnosed by them in the 1990's using a blood test and endoscopy, then you definitely have celiac disease, and hopefully you've been gluten-free since that time. You should...
    4. Russ H
      - Russ H replied to EssexMum's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      Concerning GP advice

      This sounds like a GP who is ignorant regarding coeliac disease. The risk with consuming gluten for several days is that it triggers the coeliac immune response, leading to raised auto-antibodies and active disease for several months. People may not even be aware of symptoms during this process, but it is causing damage to the body. As trents has said, the...
    5. DebD5
      - DebD5 commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

      Exactly. What about King Arthur gluten free flour selling a gluten free bread flour containing “gluten free wheat starch” and says in allergens “contains wheat.” I don’t care if it contains a trace amount of wheat ok’ed by the food industry. For a celiac…100% gluten free and that’s all is acceptable. Hard alcohols and ciders and hard seltzers say gluten free...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,647
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    anonymous54
    Newest Member
    anonymous54
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Second chance

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'm not sure why "colonoscopy" keeps coming up for you, again it would be an endoscopy to diagnose celiac disease, but it seems that Kaiser should still have your records. If you were diagnosed by them in the 1990's using a blood test and endoscopy, then you definitely have celiac disease, and hopefully you've been gluten-free since that time. You should be able to contact Kaiser for those records.
    • Russ H
      Concerning GP advice

      By Russ H · Posted

      This sounds like a GP who is ignorant regarding coeliac disease. The risk with consuming gluten for several days is that it triggers the coeliac immune response, leading to raised auto-antibodies and active disease for several months. People may not even be aware of symptoms during this process, but it is causing damage to the body. As trents has said, the gut lining normally recovers on a strict gluten-free diet, and this happens much faster in children than in adults.
    • Jmartes71
      Second chance

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      Thats the thing, diagnosed in 1994 before foods eliminated celiac by biopsy colonoscopy at Kaiser in Santa Clara  now condo's but it has to be somewhere in medical land.1999 got married, moved, changed doctor's was with former for 25 years told him I waz celiac and that.Fast forward to last year.i googled celiac specialist and what popped up was a former well known heard of hospital. I thought I would get answers to be put through unnecessary colonoscopy KNOWING im glutenfree and she wasn't listening to me for help rather than screening me for celiac! Im already diagnosed seeking medical help.I did all the appointments ask from her and when I wanted my records se t to my pcp, thats when the with holding my records when I repeatedly messaged, it was down played the seriousness and I was labeled unruly when I asked why am I going through all this when its the celiac name that IS what my issue and All my ailments surrounding it related. I am dea6eoth the autoimmune part though my blood work is supposedly fabulous. Im sibo positive,HLA-DQ2 positive, dealing with skin, eye and now ms.I was employed as a bus driver making good money, I loved it for the few years my body let me do until I was yet again fired.i went to seek medical help because my body isn't well just to be made a disability chaser. Im exhausted,glutenfree, no lawyer will help and disability is in limbo thanks to the lax on my health from the fabulous none celiac Google bay area dr snd team. Its not right.
    • trents
      Concerning GP advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community @EssexMum! First, let me correct some misinformation you have been given. Except in the case of what is known as "refractory" celiac disease, which is very rare, it is not true that the "fingers" will not grow back once a consistently gluten free diet is adopted. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition whereby the ingestion of gluten triggers an inflammatory process that damages the millions of tiny finger-like projections that make up the lining of the small bowel. We call this the "villous lining". Over time, continued ingestion of gluten on a regular basis results in the wearing down of these fingers which greatly reduces the surface area of this very important membrane. It is where essentially all the nutrition from what we eat is absorbed. So, losing this surface area results in inefficiency in nutrient absorption and often to medical problems related to nutrient deficiencies. Again, if a gluten-free diet is consistently observed, the villous lining of the small bowel should rebound. "We was informed that her body absorbs the gluten rather then rejecting it and that is why she doesn't react to the gluten straight away, it will be a build up and then the pains start. " That sounds like unscientific BS to me. But it does sound like your stepdaughter may have a type of celiac disease we know as "silent" celiac disease, meaning, she is asymptomatic or at least the symptoms are not intense enough to usually notice. She is not completely asymptomatic, however, because you stated was experiencing tummy aches off and on. Cristiana gives some good suggestions about ordering "safe" food for your stepdaughter from restaurant menus in Europe. You must realize that as the step parent who only has her part of the time you have no real control over how cooperative her other set of parents are with regard to your stepdaughter's needs to eat gluten free. It sounds like they don't really understand the seriousness of the matter. This is very common in family settings where other members are ignorant about celiac disease and the damage it can do to body systems. So, they don't take it seriously. The best you can do is make suggestions. Perhaps print out some info about celiac disease from the Internet to send them. Being inconsistent with the gluten free diet keeps the inflammation smoldering and delays or inhibits healing of the villous lining. 
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Here are some articles on cross-reactivity and celiac disease:      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.