Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Don't Understand "borderline Celiac"

NCM

Recommended Posts

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

After being very ill for over 20 years I was tested for Celiac in May and my tTG was 87 (over 20 is positive) and my EMA was positive. I had a biopsy and it showed partial villous atrophy. So I was diagnosed. Once I came back with positive blood work I inisisted on having my children tested. My 5 year old daughter had a tTG of 92 (over 20 is positive) and had a biopsy done which showed inflammation and the pediatric GI specialist diagnosed her based on bloodwork, biopsy, family history and symptoms. (she was tired and would have stomach aches and gas) My 8 year old son had a tTG of 32 (over 20 is positive) and didn't have a lot of symptoms but prior to his biopsy he started complaining a lot that his stomach hurt and has always been rather irritable. His biopsy showed inflammation (like my daughter's) but when we had his follow up appointment with the doctor (who is the head of the GI clinic at a hospital and the same one my daughter saw!) he said my son is "borderline Celiac". He said his bloodwork was considered borderline and because his biopsy showed inflammation and not damage that it was borderline too. I don't understand this and found it really frustrating! He turned to my husband and I and said it was our decision whether to have him go gluten-free. I don't understand why he clearly diagnosed my daughter but not my son! We made the decision to have my son go gluten-free because I'm terrified of him getting as sick as I was but it's bothering me what the doctor said. How can someone be borderline Celiac and how can the bloodwork be borderline if according to the lab report over 20 is positive and he is 32? Not to mention that his bloodwork was done in May and his biopsy was done in September so how do we know that by September his tTG wasn't a lot higher? AND I thought that if a biopsy shows inflammation that it's the beginning stages before atrophy?

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

NCM Newbie
NCM
Posted
  • Author

I'd say they're both celiac and you're a smart Mom to question the doctor's diagnosis. I never understood the "borderline" either but then I think a lot of doctors are clueless but that's a whole other topic. Are you making your whole house gluten-free? It would certainly make it a lot easier to not worry about cross-contamination.

And welcome to the forum!

I have a VERY supportive husband who insists on the house being gluten free. While everyone has been having their turn at a biopsy we have had it half gluten and half gluten free which has been stressful. Now that it's completely gluten free it's a lot easier. This doctor has really good credentials and is considered very knowledgeable with Celiac Disease. We did get the feeling that he wanted to study my son if he stayed on gluten. We asked him if the inflammation would get better if he stayed on gluten and he said no and I said "but it will get worse right?" and his response was "it wouldn't be wrong to agree with you" WHAT??? I asked him why would we keep him on gluten and he said that some people choose to in these circumstances because the diet is inconvenient if there's only one person in the house on it. Since when is making sure your kid is healthy an inconvenience???? Don't get me wrong the diet can be challenging at times (I've been on it for 3 months now) but I don't want to see him sick!

Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

That doctors ethics worry me. It sounds like your family may be his guinea pigs.

Borderline celiac is like a little bit pregnant. Not possible.

anna34 Enthusiast
anna34
Posted

Ugh! The whole "borderline" thing irritates me too. My test was borderline and I was told I could try the diet "if I want to" and wasn't given any other direction. Well, within 24 hours on the diet, I got my answer and haven't looked back. I don't understand why they are so hesitant to encourage a trial of the diet. It's like saying "keep doing what you're doing and we'll see if you get sicker/sick enough to test positive". :blink:

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

In the old days they demanded total villous atrophy, hence this looks borderline to them.

Just google what the well-known finnish celiac researcher M

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. HectorConvector
      - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      318

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      I'm not sure what you're referring to as "normal" here - and is this something your doctor has mentioned (in bold)? As that isn't what any study or official information says. According to diabetes UK and the British Heart Foundation, normal fasting blood sugar is 4.9-5.4mmol/L. Normal by 2 hours from the start of a meal is anywhere below 7.8mmol/L. Random...
    2. HectorConvector
      - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      318

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      My skin biopsy and MRI scan shows no signs of any type of nerve damage. Nothing consistent with demylination or peripheral nerve damage. On the contrary, the nerve function from the skin biopsy proved better than normal. I don't get any pins and needles or have any loss of nerve function. It's pain only. Thiamin I take is 100mg a day in tablet. I...
    3. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      318

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      @HectorConvector, My blood glucose level would spike after I ate. It wouldn't return to "normal" fasting blood glucose level for longer and longer. Blood glucose level should return to normal an hour after eating. Mine would take two hours, then three hours, then longer. So over night fasting blood tests wouldn't necessarily be very high until they...
    4. HectorConvector
      - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      318

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      These symptoms started initially in 2009/2010 and I've had normal blood sugar readings in all the blood tests - so never been diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes. I did request another blood test recently (yesterday in fact) which I have had, and if the blood sugar looks high it'll come up in my results which I'll be able to see next week. I don't have...
    5. Scott Adams
      0

      Gluten-Free Foods in Mexico: A Study Raises Safety and Labeling Concerns

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,589
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ozibella
    Newest Member
    Ozibella
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • HectorConvector
      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      By HectorConvector · Posted

      I'm not sure what you're referring to as "normal" here - and is this something your doctor has mentioned (in bold)? As that isn't what any study or official information says. According to diabetes UK and the British Heart Foundation, normal fasting blood sugar is 4.9-5.4mmol/L. Normal by 2 hours from the start of a meal is anywhere below 7.8mmol/L. Random (more than 2 hours after a meal) should be below 5.6mmol/L.  Not in any study of normoglyceamic individuals does blood sugar go down to less than 5.4mmol/L one hour from the start of a meal, and I don't see such numbers being considered a limit for one hour post prandial in any official definition of normal blood sugar ranges anywhere. It is basically impossible even for the most metabolically healthy individual to have a blood sugar level anything like a fasting number 1 hour only after eating a high carb meal. This is also why medical standards use the 2-hour postprandial value, not 1 hour. Blood sugar normally spikes at about 1 hour after a high carb meal.  For example this study shows that young, healthy normoglycaemic people experience a 1hr peak blood sugar level of about 6.5-7mmol/L before which the 2hr number returns to about 4.7mmol/L, slightly higher than the fasting number of that morning. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769652/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Even a normal person isn't going to be seeing essentially fasting blood sugar numbers after any meal except for one with 0 carbohdrates contents.
    • HectorConvector
      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      By HectorConvector · Posted

      My skin biopsy and MRI scan shows no signs of any type of nerve damage. Nothing consistent with demylination or peripheral nerve damage. On the contrary, the nerve function from the skin biopsy proved better than normal. I don't get any pins and needles or have any loss of nerve function. It's pain only.  Thiamin I take is 100mg a day in tablet. I used to test blood sugar a lot in the past, and it never correlated directly with the nerve pain. It has only correlated with increased exercise and stress. The after eating getting worse thing happens when the blood flow is directed to the stomach for digestion away from the peripheral areas, which is normal, but central sensitization has caused normal sensations to be turned into pain by the brain, according to the latest doctors, hence whey I am being referred to the pain clinic.
    • knitty kitty
      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @HectorConvector, My blood glucose level would spike after I ate.  It wouldn't return to "normal" fasting blood glucose level for longer and longer.  Blood glucose level should return to normal an hour after eating.  Mine would take two hours, then three hours, then longer.  So over night fasting blood tests wouldn't necessarily be very high until they got really bad.  But the peripheral neuropathy would feel the worst while my glucose was too high.  My blood glucose meter confirmed this.   On top of all that, my Celiac disease was still undiagnosed at the time, and I was suffering from malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies.  The deficiencies in B vitamins affected not just insulin production in the pancreas, but also the nerves in my extremities.  Nerves need B vitamins to maintain the myelin sheath protecting the nerves (like the plastic coating on electrical wires) when they fire.  When the myelin sheath is not maintained, that "pins and needles" feeling starts and increases as more of the sheath is damaged.  My parathesia progressed until the "pins and needles" went from my toes all the way up to my thighs.   Without sufficient vitamins, I started slowly losing weight.  Our bodies will start using not only stored fat, but also tear down our own muscles to provide fuel for the body to stay functional.   I hope you don't have pre-diabetes or diabetes.  Most diabetics have a thiamine deficiency.   How much thiamine are you taking?  What form of Thiamine are you taking?  
    • HectorConvector
      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      By HectorConvector · Posted

      These symptoms started initially in 2009/2010 and I've had normal blood sugar readings in all the blood tests - so never been diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes. I did request another blood test recently (yesterday in fact) which I have had, and if the blood sugar looks high it'll come up in my results which I'll be able to see next week. I don't have any other symptoms relevant to diabetes except for the nerve pain, which had been in existence for many years with "normoglycaemia", but we'll see. In terms of my current diet: I get roughly 60% of my calories from fat and protein, and 40% from carbs (an estimation). I'm on currently about 2200 calories per day, which is too low for someone of my size, so I've been slowly losing weight that I want to put back on again. But I don't want to do that without using weights, which flare my pain up unfortunately. 
    • Russ H
      9 y/o Son Diagnosed with Celiac Disease; Persistent Symptoms: Does this Sound Familiar?

      By Russ H · Posted

      I used to react very badly to milk - much worse than to gluten and I was always worried about exposure. Any diary product would make me extremely ill and put me out of action for 5 days or so. I would have watery and bloody diarrhoea, bloating, malaise and be unable to eat. If I recall correctly, it was about a year after being diagnosed with coeliac disease and going on a strict gluten free diet that I accidentally consumed dairy products and didn't react. From then on, I have been fine with diary. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.