Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Substituting Ingredients


chrissyinnj

Recommended Posts

chrissyinnj Apprentice

If I have a favorite recipe, can I make it gluten free by just changing out the flour for a gluten-free all purpose? Or will that cause other ingredients to have to be adjusted? Should I just look for new recipes? I'm thinking about the holidays coming up. Cookie baking, other treats etc.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ElseB Contributor

It depends.....sorry, no easy answer here! I have successfully converted gluten recipes but it required much experimentation. I have found that generally, the less flour a recipe has, the easier it is to convert. If it does have a lot of flour, you may need to increase the liquids a bit because gluten-free baked goods are inherently drier. Also, you may need to add xanthan gum. Also, try not to focus on exactly replicating things but perhaps use flavouring and ingredients as inspiration for other things. For example, my family has a traditional apple pie recipe that we always made at Thanksgiving. My mom has been unable to master gluten-free pastry (though my husband has!!) so instead she makes the same filling as always, but makes it as a apple crisp instead of a pie. Its just as good! Similarly, I've taken gluten-free muffin and cookie recipes but tweaked them a bit to add spices and flavourings from old gluten recipes. Whatever you do, always use a gluten-free all purpose mix - never just a single gluten-free flour (unless all thats needed is a few tablespoons.)

sa1937 Community Regular

If I have a favorite recipe, can I make it gluten free by just changing out the flour for a gluten-free all purpose? Or will that cause other ingredients to have to be adjusted? Should I just look for new recipes? I'm thinking about the holidays coming up. Cookie baking, other treats etc.

I think it would be dependent on the recipe. And if your gluten-free flour doesn't have xanthan gum in it, it would have to be added (or a binder of some sort).

It might be easier to look for new recipes. Or post your recipe and maybe someone can help you in converting it.

Reba32 Rookie

I've successfully made quite a few things just by substituting gluten free ingredients where the original recipe is a gluten flour. Sometimes a recipe will need tweaking, other times all it will need is some additional water because gluten free flours are more thirsty than wheat flour.

I tend to lean toward lower carb content as well as gluten free, and I don't have a problem with soy at all, it does work well as a substitute. I usually mix soy powder with a nut flour/meal (almond usually). I've recently used oat flour with good success as well. And the recipe here in the forum for the white sandwich bread, I boosted the fiber content by adding flax meal and chia seeds and decreased the white all purpose flour in the recipe.

If you're cooking with coconut flour though, you need recipes specifically for coconut flour, it does not substitute 1:1 at all!

Darn210 Enthusiast

I found that when I was trying gluten free recipes instead of converting, I was dissappointed because they didn't remotely taste like what I was familiar with . . . well that's because the overall recipe was so different.

As a result, I prefer to convert my recipes. It usually takes a couple of tries but usually the attempts are still OK (ie edible), just not as good as I had hoped. This would lead to changes such as . . . a little more flour (because the cookies spread too much), a little more liquid or fat (oil/butter/milk/water) because something was too dry/crumbly.

In general, when I convert an old recipe, I double the amount of leavening agent . . . if a recipe calls for 1 tsp of baking soda, I will usually use 1 tsp of baking soda and 1 tsp of baking powder. I also double the amount of vanilla in any recipe. And of course, as mentioned above, if your gluten free replacement doesn't have xanthan gum in it, then that needs to be added as well.

One of the keys to good gluten free cooking is to really like your replacement flour mix . . . it makes all the difference in the world to texture/taste/grittiness. You can take a look on the board and read peoples feed back. There are a lot of decent brands to use (Better Batter, Tom Sawyer, King Arthur's, etc) I personally don't like the ones with the bean flours in them as I think it gives the end product an aftertaste. Lot's of people use their own home mix. This is what I prefer.

If you are converting a meal-type recipe, your best bet is just to post a question here to find out what is the best replacement for an ingrediant . . . for instance, in my chicken and rice casserole, I now use Pacific Foods Cream of Chicken Condensed soup instead of the old Campbell's.

Now . . . I DO use some of the specifically gluten free recipes that are out there. There is a gluten-free pumpkin streusel cake recipe on this board somewhere that was wonderful!! I also use the gluten-free yellow cake recipe that I got off of allrecipes.com. This is because prior to my daughter going gluten free, I didn't have cake recipes . . . I just used the box mixes.

Katrala Contributor

I haven't done it much, but have been successful a few times substituting a gluten-free flour mix in for a specific recipe. As someone else said, the less flour that is called for, the better the results seem to be.

I've read some books that discuss the qualities of all the different flours and how they can change the outcome, but so far I've only tried subbing in very simple flours.

Takala Enthusiast

Depends on what sort of baker you are to begin with, if you're good at just doodling around, you can probably get away with just subbing in a gluten free flour mixture and tweaking it a little. Otherwise, it's better to do searches for "recipe gluten free name of thing" and using one of those, especially one that has been battle tested by a lot of commenters underneath the article, so you can see if it's okay or a dud.

One time a blogger on one gluten-free specialty website sort of lifted another recipe off of another, and didn't convert it properly, and had now less flour and a lot more liquid, and ZOMG, it was a comedy of errors underneath as dozens of puzzled cookers informed that It Did Not Work, and she wasn't coming up with the fix, but instead going off onto tangents like "is your oven the right temperature," as dozens of loaves of bread rose and then collapsed across America as they came out of the oven. Same thing happened with the gluten-free Bisquick people last year, they took the regular holiday cookie recipe for snowballs, aka the Mexican Wedding Cookie, and tried to pass it off as gluten free with the gluten-free Bisquick used for the flour, no adaptations, well, the gluten-free Bisquick is nothing but rice flour and sugar, and the resulting cookies proceeded to crumble and crumble. You can't expect just rice flour, without added mixtures of other gluten-free flours, to mimic the way wheat flour performs in a recipe, it just isn't going to happen, no matter how much gum or fat is put into it.

There are blends of gluten free flours that you can either purchase or make yourself that can be used for cakes/cookies and breads. Some flours are starchy and some are higher protein, it is the blending of them successfully that makes the best results. (see Pamela's, King Arthur, etc)

Typically it is rice, tapioca, and potato starch or cornstarch, in roughly thirds, that works well for "white" flour. Some people like to add sorghum and/or millet flours to this mixture, for taste.

Bread flours tend to work well with the same mixtures with bean flours added for protein and texture. Different sorts of bean flours taste differently, (some people don't like them) and the bean flours in commercial pre mixtures tend to go "off" quickly. Bean flours should be stored in a refrigerator or freezer. A little bit of vinegar and cumin also helps bean flours taste okay in breads.

There are many other flours and nut and seed meals that can be blended for a more whole - grain type of mixture, such as amaranth, buckwheat, teff, sorghum, millet, almond meal, quinoa. I keep a mixture of amaranth-sorghum in one bag in the refrigerator and another bag of potato starch and garbanzo bean flour, and then mix and match with the others, as needed. Almond, amaranth and buckwheat are very interesting to work with, as they need less "gum" or even none at all, depending on how the rest of the recipe goes. Amaranth is also mold retardant, baked goods stay better in the refrigerator longer when it is in the recipe. A classic mixture is 1/3 each buckwheat, bean, and potato starch for pancakes, no egg needed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,015
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carrie-S
    Newest Member
    Carrie-S
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...