Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

:( Doubtful Now...

Aightball

Recommended Posts

Aightball Apprentice
Aightball
Posted

I have a question...

I was reading a thread and it was mentioned that the definitive test for celiac disease is the endo down the throat...I've had that and it was negative. I am going to double check that with the GI doc tomorrow when he's in, but I just know mine was negative...so why, then, would the allergy doc think I was intolerant to wheat/gluten? I didn't test allergic to wheat...

My main complaints were: diahreea (which most of my family gets from time to time anyway), and ocassional tummy aches. Mostly my diaherre came after the first big meal of the day. While I have been trying to be gluten-free, I have found things that *don't* bother me over the last few weeks (though I don't have those now since I am supposed ot be gluten-free). Now, for the most part, yeah, I do feel better on the gluten-free diet, but I still have lose/soft stools, diahreea, ect. Could the allergy doc have been wrong?

I should also clarify that I hve an ovarian cyst, if that effects anything...

-Kel

confused as hell...:(

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gf4life Enthusiast
gf4life
Posted

Hi Kel,

The endoscopy is the medical fields choice of test for diagnosing Celiac, but it is not fool proof. I also had a negative biopsy. I am not even going to have my kids biopsied at all. They all tested inconclusive on the bloodtests (positive IgG, negative on tall the IgA tests). I had a lot of similar symptoms to you and more, yet I tested negative on the blood test as well.

The problem is that the blood test will only show positive if you have damage to the intestines bad enough for the antibodies to "leak" out into the bloodstream. The biopsy depends on the skill of the doctor who does the biopsy and if they hit the right spot, since damage can be patchy. It also depends on the skill of the lab techs and doctors examining the specimen. If they are looking for worst case scenario Celiac then they will often say negative when their is minimal damage. But damage is damage. It is like the difference between a broken leg and a compound fractured broken leg. They are both going to hurt like crazy and take time to heal. One is not as bad as the other, but they are both bad. Doctor's just haven't caight up with the latest research, that shows the biopsy is not the best test.

I opted(after hitting a wall in regards to all my doctors) for testing through Enterolab. They use the latest technology in Celiac/Gluten intolerance testing. It ends up that I have the celiac gene and a gluten intolerance gene. My daughter has the same, my sons both have the gluten intolerance gene (one has two copies,and one has another type of autoimmune disorder gene that can also cause gluten intolerance). We are all producing antibodies to gluten and to dairy in our intestines, but so far the damage to the intestines is minimal in a few of us and borderline bad in one of my sons. So I am glad I know now and can help us all avoid further damage.

You can be gluten intolerant without being celiac, and you can also have either (or both) with negative blood/endoscopic biopsy tests. Please listen to your body, and not your doctor when it comes to this. If you feel you need further testing to reassure yourself (as I did) then you may want to check out Open Original Shared Link for their testing. Most US doctors are behind the times. Doctors in Italy are now doing the stool testing too, as they realise it is much better at diagnosing gluten intolerance even in its early stages.

As to why somethings bother you and others don't (I assume you are talking about gluten foods?) I read recently in a book about allergies/intolerances (from 1974, but has some quite good info, way ahead of it's time!) that for some people even a speck of the offending food will cause a reaction but for others it may take a larger amount, but the reaction will still happen eventually. I really feel this is true. Of course I am not saying it is okay to have just a little bit of gluten. It may take a larger serving for you to notice the symptoms, but with just a little bit the symptoms may be too subtle for you to notice. The damage is still being done though, so it is best to avoid as much as possible.

God bless,

Mariann

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

      By trents · Posted

      When you say a GI doc did an IGA five years ago and it was negative, which IGA measure do you speak of. There are several possibilities. Do you refer to the tTG-IGA? Have you had a total IGA test done? It isn't a test for celiac per se but can establish whether or not you are IGA deficient. If you are IGA deficient, it will drive individual IGA test scores down and can result in false positives. The tTG-IGA should always be accompanied by a total IGA test. When people are IGA deficient and actually do have celiac disease we often see it detected by the IGG tests. The same can be said if they have been skimping on gluten previous to the blood draw and, IMO, negatives in the IGA test spectrum with positives in the IGG spectrum can also point to NCGS or NCGS transitioning to celiac.
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate. I agree that if your biopsy ends up negative, that you still may need to be gluten-free, as you could be in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity area. Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. Be sure to eat lots of gluten daily until your endoscopy, otherwise you could get false negative results.    
    • hmkr
      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

      By hmkr · Posted

      I had several celiac blood tests done at a rheumatologist last month. I've had many possible symptoms over the last 23 years, including GERD/LPR, constipation, and recently joint stiffness and pain in my hands. It all started during my first pregnancy. 1/160 ANA back then as well as now with no autoimmune diagnosis. I've had undiagnosed high fevers, swollen lymphs nodes, ear pain, miscarriages, to name just a few more symptoms. I can't help but be upset at the many doctors I've been to that have missed this. A GI doctor only did the IgA 5 years ago, which was negative then too, and didn't do a biopsy as a result during an endoscopy shortly after. Deaminated Gliadin IgG Antibody test was 90, >15 being abnormal.   Deaminated Gliadin IgA Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibody, negative I'm scheduled for a biopsy at the end of January. The new GI doctor thinks if not celiac, I will still need to be gluten free the rest of my life due to the antibodies my body is producing. I feel like it's got to be celiac. I've been consuming gluten every day to prepare for this test. It can't come soon enough.  Thoughts on that IgG being positive and the others negative? I haven't gotten a clear explanation for that yet. Thanks in advance for any input!! 
    • Kiwifruit
      Years of testing - no real answers

      By Kiwifruit · Posted

      That’s good to know. Might be time to head back to my gastrointestinal doctor then.
    • trents
      Years of testing - no real answers

      By trents · Posted

      Yeah, you may not have been consuming enough gluten to result in valid testing.
×
×
  • Create New...