Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anyone Able To Interpret The Genetic Testing


Debbie48

Recommended Posts

Debbie48 Rookie

Today I got my genetic testing back.

It shows category #4 DQ2 heterozygous. Related risk high. Though I see there is a Very High and Extremely High category, in addition to Moderate, Low, and Extremely Low.

Specifically, DQ2.5 (HLA DQA1*05:DQB1*201) are listed.

The only blood work that came back positive was the Anti-gliadin IGA, which was 24 on a range from 0-15.

Biopsy was done a few months before they were really looking for celiac so I don't know how many biopsies were taken, but they didn't show anything abnormal.

Yes, I have many symtoms but I also have sjogren's syndrome.

Have been trying to be gluten free but am still trying to work out things like shampoos, detergents, lotions, and the like. It will probably take awhile to get thing right.

I am not feeling at all better after a few weeks gluten free. In fact, I'd say that it feels like everything I eat makes me sick and I continue to lose weight.

Have pain in my arms and tingling in my face, legs, and feet.

Thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

This is the most common celiac gene, also nicknamed HLA DQ2. (HLA DQ2,5)

You have only one copy of the DQ2,5 gene.

If you call the lab, they might have the result of the other gene (but it would not change things, since you already have the typical celiac gene)

Those genes are just about the risk, they do not mean you are celiac. Lots of people have HLA DQ2 and will never develop celiac disease.

The positive antigliadin IgA probably means it is early or patchy celiac, and with patchy celiac they might find a spot with celiac, or not, when taking biopsies.

Did they do the more specific deaminated gliadin test that many are getting now? It is much better at catching early celiac.

Debbie48 Rookie

They did 4 different tests on blood work before the gene test. Here's what came back.

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A-SERUM normal range

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGA 24 (Abn: H) 0 - 15 is normal

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGG normal range

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE-A normal range

Annotation:

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGA

strict gluten free diet.

As stated, they would not do another endoscopy because they had done one 3 months earlier while checking for something else. From what I read on the biopsy report, lab only received 2 samples from the small intestines, which looked normal.

The only thing shown in the endoscopy was inflammation of the stomach. Colonoscopy showed 3 small diverticula.

Nurse for GI doc says go gluten free, regular GP says this really doesn't mean anything. It's very important to me, of course. My son came back with the same blood work, with an even higher Gliadin Antibody, IGA of 36.

researchmomma Contributor

They did 4 different tests on blood work before the gene test. Here's what came back.

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A-SERUM normal range

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGA 24 (Abn: H) 0 - 15 is normal

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGG normal range

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE-A normal range

Annotation:

GLIADIN ANTIBODY, IGA

strict gluten free diet.

As stated, they would not do another endoscopy because they had done one 3 months earlier while checking for something else. From what I read on the biopsy report, lab only received 2 samples from the small intestines, which looked normal.

The only thing shown in the endoscopy was inflammation of the stomach. Colonoscopy showed 3 small diverticula.

Nurse for GI doc says go gluten free, regular GP says this really doesn't mean anything. It's very important to me, of course. My son came back with the same blood work, with an even higher Gliadin Antibody, IGA of 36.

Take all this paperwork to a new GI that specializes in Celiac disease.

Skylark Collaborator

Nora has given you great advice. :)

Debbie48 Rookie

Thanks everyone!

domesticactivist Collaborator

Yup.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

There recently was a study trying to find out why one area in the U.S. had half as many positive biopsies compared to the other half of the country, and the difference was how many samples were taken.

Now the area where they took 4 or more samples while doing endoscopy, had twice as many diagnosed with celiac compared to where they only took about 2 samples.

I guess they missed your celiac, as the most common form of celiac nowadays is patchy celiac.

Also, the antigliadin test is known to rise first, and then the ttg, in early celiac.

I would guess that if you continue eating gluten, and even increase the gluten intake, then you will get a positive ttg test, and positive biopsies, after a month or two.

Things can change in a matter of a month or two or three.

But maybe the very specific deaminated gliadin test would tell you more beforehand, as it is very specific for celiac. If it is negative, it probably would not help to do another endoscopy yet.

(here in Europe we often do a gluten challenge to get a diagnosis, if the test results are dubious)

Debbie48 Rookie

You are so knowledgeable, Nora!

Thank you for the information!

I love this group!

Debbie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,289
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bethidyho
    Newest Member
    Bethidyho
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Possibly, but there used to be a movement within the celiac disease community to just tell restaurants that you have a deadly wheat/gluten allergy to, hopefully anyway, ensure that your meal is actually gluten-free. I don't recommend this approach at all, and if I ran a restaurant where there was ANY risk of cross-contamination, I'm afraid that I would decline to server someone who made this claim. No restaurant owner wants anyone dying or going to the emergency room at their business.
    • Scott Adams
      You mention that you are waiting on your test results--did they do a celiac blood panel? If so, were you eat lots of gluten in the 6-8 weeks leading up to the test? This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      According to their website they are gluten-free: https://www.somersby.com/en/faq/  
    • Scott Adams
      If you suspect celiac disease a blood panel for it would be the best option. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • trents
      Your only resort would seem to be directly contacting the manufacturer and ask some pointed questions about CC . . . and hope you get some straight answers. You are probably already aware of this but the label "Gluten Free" does not necessarily equate to zero gluten. "Gluten Free" is a standard established by the FDA whereby a product can use that label as long as it does not contain an amount of gluten exceeding 20 ppm. There is also "Certified Gluten Free" which is a third party certifying standard signifying that the product does not exceed 10 ppm. There are limits to detection technology much below that.    
×
×
  • Create New...