Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If Your Doctor Won't Order Testing...


domesticactivist

Recommended Posts

domesticactivist Collaborator

My mom decided to go ahead and get screened, finally. But she has Kaiser and they had to be convinced. Finally they used their screening protocol and ordered only the anti tTG IgA, despite the detailed list I had given her, with specific info on how important it was to also get total IgA for any tests that look at IgA.

Apparently, their protocol also does not allow for running the EMA, or anti-Gliadin Deamidated Peptide IgA or IgG. First they do genetic screening and take family history IF the tTG comes back positive before they will approve those tests. How much do you want to bet their genetic screening only looks for DQ2 and DQ8 and doesn't even look at HLA-DQ alpha?

Open Original Shared Link is more expensive than the blood work. My kids were covered by their insurance for the genetic screening and we couldn't put our son back on gluten, so we did it. I did not get mine done because I was paying out of pocket and was able to extrapolate my results from theirs. I can't remember the cost, now, I think it was something like $360.

What I do know is that I paid only $169 plus a $15 blood draw fee for a combined celiac panel including Total IgA, anti-tTG IgA, EMA, and anti-Gliadin Deamidated Peptide IgA and IgG!!!

These tests can be ordered online (in most USA states) without permission from your doctor, without insurance, for a bit more than I paid through my doctor. Open Original Shared Link

This might be very worth doing if you can't get in to see your doctor or can't get your doctor to approve your blood tests. A couple hundred bucks is plenty, especially if you are poor like we are right now. But the costs of staying on gluten longer in hopes of a doctor finally ordering the tests could be much higher. I was surprised at how reasonable the cost was to get a full standard screening.

I have a friend who is very concerned about the cost and only wants to order the tests if she first uses up her high deductible/health care savings account and can get her doctor to order it and insurance to pay. What is her deductible being consumed with right now? A slew of medications that attempt to control symptoms which could be caused by celiac! I'll definitely be sharing the low cost of getting blood work with her, now that I know!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rosetapper23 Explorer

I'm sorry that your mom has Kaiser. When I asked for my son to be tested by his Kaiser pediatrician eight years ago, he told me he'd never ordered tests for celiac in his career (and this man was probably around 45 at the time), so he would need to check with other doctors to be able to order the tests. I recall that he only ordered one test, but it came back positive, so I didn't pursue any more testing. After years of being treated by Kaiser doctors who had no idea what celiac was about, I finally did some research and came up with the name of a celiac expert who worked at the San Francisco Kaiser. Unfortunately, he wrote me back saying that he no longer worked for Kaiser and that there were NO doctors in the entire Kaiser system who could be considered experienced in treating celiac. I felt very disheartened at that point. Finally, I found a doctor at the Walnut Creek Kaiser who was honest about it--he said that he had never had a patient with celiac (yeah, he'd probably had dozens and didn't know it) but that he was willing to learn. He ordered every test I wanted and ordered intravenous iron when necessary, even though he'd initially never heard of the procedure. In the end, though, Kaiser misdiagnosed my breast cancer, totally flubbed the breast cancer surgery, and then supposedly lost ALL of my medical records (probably to hide their errors in case of a lawsuit). By the way, if your mother is diagnosed with celiac and ever needs to stay at a Kaiser hospital, she should bring ALL of her own food. During the three days I was at Kaiser following my surgery, they refused to feed me anything (because of the celiac) and then glutened me with generic medications that contained gluten--they simply didn't understand that they couldn't just give me pills without checking for gluten first. My mother, who also has celiac, was hospitalized at Kaiser last year for a fainting episode. While they were doing tests, they insisted that she eat even though she kept telling them that she couldn't eat gluten. They assured her that they "thought" the food probably didn't contain gluten. They fed her a Mexican spicy enchilada, and the end result was that she became so ill from being glutened (and there is usually a heightened response to gluten with peppers), she had to remain at the hospital for another three days because they said she was too ill to be discharged. As they continued to make her sicker and sicker, she demanded that they release her. She was very ill for almost a month afterward. Anyway, I left Kaiser a few months after the botched surgery and paid an integrated medicine doctor full price until I could change my insurance carrier to Blue Shield. It was one of the best decisions I've ever made. Now, I know that this forum does not appreciate posters speaking badly of companies or products, but all of the experiences described are factual occurrences.

If your mother is retired, then I know her insurance options are limited. However, if she tests positive for celiac, the testing is only the first hurdle she will encounter at Kaiser. She will need to be her own advocate.

domesticactivist Collaborator

How sad, rosetapper23! That is really unacceptable. I wish it didn't take such a monumental effort to mount a medical malpractice suit because your story and your mother's story definitely warrant a couple.

I actually had improved my opinion of Kaiser in the past few years. I had a friend who was a breast cancer survivor. When it came back, her doctor and many others she went to for pain misdiagnosed the return of her cancer for at least a year. When she switched to Kaiser, it was finally diagnosed. She received top of the line treatment (and participated in a study) for the rest of her too-short life.

I am appalled at the completely lack of information my mom's doctor had! My mom does not have symptoms and all her other blood work came back fine (no osteoperosis, good metabolic panel, etc), and her tTG was low. It's so frustrating that they wouldn't just run the d*** panel once she finally got around to asking for it! I'm more suspicious I got my genes from my dad, anyway. I take after him in a number of ways, including many health issues. No chance of him getting tested, though :(

Fortunately for us, my kids have CIGNA health insurance through their dad. It's spendy, but we only paid $100 when our son was hospitalized for 4 days and had to undergo orthopedic surgery on his hip, lots of labs, and IV antibiotics. The actual bill was in the $100,000 range! We can take them to any health care provider we like, and they will pay a percentage out of network. PPOs are really the way to go, IMO.

My partner and I, on the other hand, have no health insurance. Maybe Obamacare will eventually come through for us but I'm not holding my breath.

rosetapper23 Explorer

I'm glad your friend received good treatment for her breast cancer at Kaiser. My biggest problem with them is that they refuse to deviate from a particular "standard of care" methodology where they refuse to allow for the latest techniques and medications to be used for cancer. When I questioned my Kaiser oncologist about using alternative methods, she opened the door and told me to get out. My oncologist through Blue Shield welcomes innovative techniques and researches anything new that I suggest. He even tests me regularly for side effects to taking certain natural supplements that are standard fare in China for treating cancer. You see, my breast cancer returned a year ago (four tumors, to be exact) because it appears that the Kaiser surgeon may have missed some of the cancer. She told me that my type of cancer was hardly even considered a "true" cancer, but, rather, it used to be considered a precancerous condition. After she did her sloppy job (and failed to perform a sentinal lymph node dissection as I had requested), it turned out that the cancer was invasive and considered a rare, highly aggressive, highly metastatic, and recurrent type. Since Kaiser exhausted the chemos for my type of cancer, I'm only able to use alternative means to fight it now that it's recurred. Currently, my surgeon and oncologist both believe I'm in remission, having removed the tumors and nearby tissue....but I sleep with one eye open.

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast
:o These stories are SHOCKING! My heart goes out to anyone that has to deal with these ridiculous red tape companies. :angry:
mushroom Proficient

I used to work in medical malpractice litigation, and I have heard some hair-raisers, many involving Kaiser. I won't elaborate, but Kaiser members have my sympathies. When their care is good it can be vey good with the right doctor, but the general level stinks. At one point it looked as if Kaiser would be our only insurance option, and the one we had to select wasn't much better, but I have always avoided them. :ph34r:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,986
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vickie Clancy
    Newest Member
    Vickie Clancy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...