Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Biopsy For Celiac But Symptoms Remain. What Do To Next?


tarheel84

Recommended Posts

tarheel84 Newbie

Last week i underwent an EGD upper endoscopy to see if I have signs of Celiac Disease in my small intestines. I got the results today that there were no irregular signs in my small intestines and they do not think I have Celiac Disease. Does this completely rule out Celiac Disease? If it likely does, is there something else that my symptoms might be characteristic of?

About 2 weeks before the EGD I had been gluten free for 10 days and felt considerably better. I switched back to eating gluten for 2 weeks before the EGD and notice my brain fog returned, mood declined, and constipation returned too. The symptoms that caused me to suspect Celiac Disease were brain fog, anxiety, constipation with occasional D, oily and often red/orange tinted stools, thin stools, and occasional bloating/distended abdomen.

I


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

Did they do the Celiac blood tests on you? You have to have been eating gluten regularly to have positive tests.

Also, if there wasn't obvious severe damage in your intestine it can be kind of hit or miss with the biopsy samples they take. Damage can be patchy, and if they only take a couple samples they could miss the villi changes.

Your symptoms sound like you could have a problem with gluten. Why not cut every bit of it out of your diet for 3 months? Cut dairy too, because that can cause some problems as well if you have any villi damage.

You don't need a Dr.s approval to see how you feel off gluten. Change your toothbrush and be aware that any non-stick cookware that has scratches could contain trace gluten. Wooden spoons and cutting boards can also have it.

Eat foods from the outer parameter of the grocery store. Fruits, veggies, unprocessed meats, eggs, rice.

Check your salad dressings and condiments to make sure they don't have gluten ingredients.

Now..fix yourself a nice salad, grill some meat, add a veggie and you're good to go.

Or make beef stew, or stir fry(check the soy sauce), or bean soup, etc.... :D

Lori2 Contributor

You could have gluten intolerance without having celiac disease. Check out this Wall Street Journal article about recent research by Dr. Fasano of the University of Maryland Celiac Center.

Open Original Shared Link

AVR1962 Collaborator

The problems with sinuses, strep and feeling like you could not keep up with the others makes me believe this is Celiac and not just a gluten intolerance. The bad thing about testing is it is not accurate. You cna find this documented in books and other literature about celiac. You can test today, tests results come back negative....test again in a year and have the tests results as postive. Unfortunately if you do have celiac or a gluten intolerance and you continue to consume gluten you are not going to get any better. Infact, more probable that you will only contnue to slowly get worse.

Sometimes we have to do what is best for us even thought there is no medical proof of what is making us better. You mentioned that you felt better off gluten. I would go back off and see if your symptoms continue to improve. Initially, I would cut out dairy as well. I know that sounds like you are losing everything but by going off both for a couple months, you can later add one and see if it is effecting you and then try to he other. It may be one or both. If you find dairy is also effecting you, it might not always be the case....your system may just need time to heal. I take a lactose enzyme and I am fine.

beebs Enthusiast

I was saying a few weeks back that our Paed GI had a patient and he had negative bloods, negative endo and he just got sicker and sicker and eventually they got him to swallow a camera pill and found celiac damage way down where the endo doesn't reach. So yeah - its possible to have negative endo and still be celiac.

UKGail Rookie

Me too. I have negative blood tests, had a negative biopsy 2 years ago (after being gluten lite for a little while). Doc told me not to worry, I didn't have celiac, and I should eat a normal diet. I did, and my health continued to decline rapidly. I am now gluten free and am much better, but after 5 months my health is still nowhere near back to where it was even 2 years ago. I wish I had listened to my instincts (and my husband)rather than the doctor back then, and saved myself and my family a lot of additional misery. I am 47 and I first became unwell with celiac symptoms in my twenties. It was missed by the docs then too.

tarheel84 Newbie

Thank you all for your insight and personal stories. It's always comforting to hear other people going through similar journeys. My doctor had described the EGD as the "gold standard" but i forgot that it's still not fullproof. I was too quick to accept that i may not be gluten intolerant or celiac. Thank you for pointing out it's not 100% accurate.

I've decided that I will definitely give up dairy since i know i don't tolerate it well. I am also going to start an 'elimination diet' next week to see if it is gluten or possibly some other food allergy culprit. If i start feeling better i'll do my first food "challenge" with a gluten product, probably cream of wheat since it has gluten but no yeast. Then i'll go on to test some other potential food allergies. I'm looking forward to figuring this out!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thank you all for your insight and personal stories. It's always comforting to hear other people going through similar journeys. My doctor had described the EGD as the "gold standard" but i forgot that it's still not fullproof. I was too quick to accept that i may not be gluten intolerant or celiac. Thank you for pointing out it's not 100% accurate.

I've decided that I will definitely give up dairy since i know i don't tolerate it well. I am also going to start an 'elimination diet' next week to see if it is gluten or possibly some other food allergy culprit. If i start feeling better i'll do my first food "challenge" with a gluten product, probably cream of wheat since it has gluten but no yeast. Then i'll go on to test some other potential food allergies. I'm looking forward to figuring this out!

Cream of wheat is a good challenge pick. I used that and triscuits. When you do challenge go with as pure of a form of what you are challenging as possible and do eat the suspect food 3 times a day for a week. If you have celiac or gluten intolerance the reaction can take a few days to hit. If you do react of course drop the item and wait until the reaction resolves before trying another.

I hope your feeling better soon.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ChrisJ25
    Newest Member
    ChrisJ25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...