Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Newly Diagnosed?


Merriweather

Recommended Posts

Merriweather Newbie

My blood tests came back positive and my biopsy showed an increase in immune cells in my small intestine but no vilious atrophy. According to my doctor I have celiac disease but based on information I've been reading there seems to be conflicting opinions about a diagnosis without vilious atrophy. Does anyone have more information about this?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rosetapper23 Explorer

Yes, one of the leading experts on celiac disease, Dr. Alessio Fassano, believes that a positive endoscopic biopsy should no longer be considered the gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease. If your bloodwork was positive, you can be certain that you have celiac disease (false positives are rare). Be thankful that your celiac was diagnosed before too much damage occurred.

Merriweather Newbie

Thanks for your feedback. I've been struggling with IBS for 15 plus years and was happy to finally have some answers besides doctors just telling me I have IBS. I didn't realize how confusing the diagnosis process is....I just wonder if a different GI dr. looked at my biopsy results would he/she have a different diaganosis?

rosetapper23 Explorer

Actually, Dr. Fasano cites a number of things that can skew a biopsy: 1) the scope wasn't long enough to reach the damaged area, 2) the surgeon was not skilled enough at taking samples, 3) the pathologist lacked the skill or competence to diagnose celiac, 4) even if a large number of samples were biopsied, it's possible that the surgeon did not biopsy the areas with villous atrophy, and 5) probably a number of other factors that I can't remember. From a study I read recently, the chances of getting a correctly sampled and read biopsy at a standard clinic or hospital are pretty low but accuracy increases at teaching hospitals and universities. There are so many variables that can go wrong, biopsies can be pretty much worthless.

Merriweather Newbie

As a follow up, I met with my primary care doctor this week and according to her, my diagnosis is not a "slam dunk", meaning all test results "suggest celiac disease" due to the positive blood work and increase of intraepithelial lymphocytes from my biopsy, but because there's no vilous atrophy it's not a diagnosis of 100%. Even though other autoimmune diseases were ruled out, I have onogoing GI issues and a history of vitamin deficiences and low iron. This all confuses me even more so because when my GI doc gave me the results he said that I definitely have celiac disease, even when I questioned that the biopsy results only showed an increase in IELs. It just seems like there are many differing opinions on this. Do others have the same confusion I'm experiencing? I guess I'm going with what my GI doctor said, but I still have some doubts due to the biopsy result. I've had horrible GI symptoms for many years, so shouldn't this have been reflected in the amount damage to my small intestine?

mushroom Proficient

The increase in IEL's is one of the precursors to villous atrophy. Inflammation is another. There are varying stages in the progression of intestinal damage. The old standard required for total or subtotal villous atrophy, the equivalent of III on the Marsh scale of I - IV before they would diagnose. Doctors seem a little more enlightened these days and realize that you don't have to wait until somebody is really damaged that badly to make a diagnosis. I would go with your GI's opinion rather your PCP since he has more experience in such things. :)

Takala Enthusiast
I've had horrible GI symptoms for many years, so shouldn't this have been reflected in the amount damage to my small intestine?

Not necessarily, as strange as it may seem. The intestines are quite long and the damage is patchy.... they are looking for the atrophy in the haystack, so to speak. Plus, you can be reacting to different foods in addition to gluten - and some or all of this may go away after going gluten free, or sometimes one discovers additional intolerances. People may think they can't digest fats, when in reality, their livers and gall bladders are very wonky from consuming gluten. Eliminate gluten, and the ability to digest some fats may return. People may have a lot of trouble digesting any sort of starch derived from non gluten grains, either temporarily or permanently. I had no idea flax would do a number on me, until I kept running into gluten free baked goods with that as an ingredient. There was no reason for me to eat flax in the first place, I had tasted it and thought "nasty, bitter." Yet a lot of recipes have it, and I can tell people how to use it as an egg substitute, just leave it out of my food, thank you. Other ingredients which can disagree with celiacs/gluten intolerants include soy flours and the lactose in dairy products.

Fine tuning the gluten free diet can take awhile sorting out what does and does not agree with you at first.

I was not "confused" as I knew "for sure" I had a food problem, it was the medical profession which was being contradictory - it has been over a decade since I started to try getting diagnosed ( !!! ), I've done enough experimenting on my diet that I know, and I have had atypical symptoms for most of my adult life. Eventually, I had a brain scan which showed bright spots. I still do not "officially" have my disease, but the other problem was that we moved cross country in the late '90's and went into a different form of insurance... I think my old GP in the former state, who was very sharp, may have eventually caught this, but I was rather shocked at some of the deliberately incompetent responses I had when taking my other auto immune issues first into the HMO - these so called non profit orgs are nothing but rip offs. Good riddance. Current GP/PCP accepts that at least I am gluten intolerant because of the mysterious way I now been "cured" of several other problems since the Diet Change.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rosetapper23 Explorer

Your primary doctor is obviously not an expert on celiac, so I would disregard what she has said. Because there are so very few "experts" on this disease, you can pretty much take it to the bank when someone like Dr. Fasano says that a biopsy is not necessary. He's tried to convince many a doctor that the old gold standard simply no longer applies. If you have symptoms that resolve on a gluten-free diet, positive bloodwork, and positive genes, you do NOT even need to have a biopsy. Since your biopsy showed something amiss, I don't see how there could be any question that you have celiac disease.

I know it's confusing...but it's the doctors who are confused.

faithforlife Apprentice

Biopsies in our families were similar. But our GI says even if it's the beginning if celiac, it's still celiac. Our bloodwork and genetic testing is enough to verify. And how we feel gluten-free. But I still struggle with doubts it's more emotional. I have to work through letting it sink in. It's only been a year since we began the process of testing etc.

Skylark Collaborator

As a follow up, I met with my primary care doctor this week and according to her, my diagnosis is not a "slam dunk", meaning all test results "suggest celiac disease" due to the positive blood work and increase of intraepithelial lymphocytes from my biopsy, but because there's no vilous atrophy it's not a diagnosis of 100%. Even though other autoimmune diseases were ruled out, I have onogoing GI issues and a history of vitamin deficiences and low iron. This all confuses me even more so because when my GI doc gave me the results he said that I definitely have celiac disease, even when I questioned that the biopsy results only showed an increase in IELs. It just seems like there are many differing opinions on this. Do others have the same confusion I'm experiencing? I guess I'm going with what my GI doctor said, but I still have some doubts due to the biopsy result. I've had horrible GI symptoms for many years, so shouldn't this have been reflected in the amount damage to my small intestine?

Did you ask your primary care doctor just how sick you have to get before she'll stop practicing poor medicine and diagnose you? I mean really, does she want you to wait until you have total villous atrophy? You are very fortunate to have a GI who is reading the latest research. Increased IEL is the first phase of celiac disease and the latest thinking is that positive bloodwork plus increased IEL is definitely celiac disease.

Merriweather Newbie

Thanks for all your feedback....everyone here is so helpful!

I got a copy of my pathology report with the following:

Duodenum biopsy: duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and increased intaepithelial lymphocytes. See note.

Note: Villous architecture is essentially preserved. The differential diagnosis includes gluten sensitivity or family history of gluten sensitivity, tropicalsprue, post viral gastroenteritis, bacterial overgrowth, allergy to other antigens and immunodeficiency syndromes (CVID, IgA defiency) these features have also been described in patients with a history of crohn's disease (Modern Path 2002).

When I talked to my GI doctor he said that based on my positive tTG and biopsy results I definitely have celiac. I'm just confused with this path report because the note doesn't really clarify a diagnosis....any thoughts?

kareng Grand Master

Looks like you got lucky and were diagnosed before too much damage was done. Also possible that they took 4 microscopic biospies of 16 feet of small intestine and missed the worst spots.

Skylark Collaborator

I don't understand why you are fighting a celiac diagnosis so hard. Don't you want to be rid of the horrible GI symptoms? You have a chance to change everything here! :) Have you gone gluten-free? Are you feeling better? That will be the final proof for you, when years of GI symptoms melt away over the next few months.

Your GI is looking at the whole picture, symptoms, blood tests, early celiac biopsy. He's looking from the perspective of a doctor who has probably seen a lot of cases of celiac disease and he has obviously kept well up-to-date on the celiac research. Doctors don't diagnose on a single test; they take all the information before them into account.

Merriweather Newbie

@skylark - It might come across that I'm fighting the diagnosis, but I guess I was just hoping for more conclusive results from my biopsy - given the terrible GI symptoms I've had for years, I thought the biopsy would either show no damage or a lot oh damage, but maybe that's just my misunderstanding of all of this. I'm definitely going with the diagnosis from my GI doc and have been gluten free for a little over a week now. I've been feeling ok so far, but time will tell to see if there's an impact over time. My dr Tod me I can have IBS along with celiac, so we shall see if eating gluten free is the answer. I certainly hope so!!!

Skylark Collaborator

@skylark - It might come across that I'm fighting the diagnosis, but I guess I was just hoping for more conclusive results from my biopsy - given the terrible GI symptoms I've had for years, I thought the biopsy would either show no damage or a lot oh damage, but maybe that's just my misunderstanding of all of this.

Let me put it in perspective. It's HARD to get positive results on celiac tests, even when you know gluten is half-killing you. There are people on this board who have paid $300 and up for alternative, unvalidated fecal tests or genetic testing their insurance wouldn't cover because their blood tests were negative and they KNEW they couldn't eat gluten.

Ten years ago, someone had to not only have antibodies, but chronic diarrhea, horrible villous atrophy, and be pretty much wasting away before they would be diagnosed as celiac. Celiac wouldn't even be suspected without massive weight loss from malabsorption because it was considered rare. Turns out what is rare is a Marsh 3 or 4 biopsy, not celiac disease. Lots of people like you stayed miserable because their doctors would say they didn't have celiac disease. Now doctors are diagnosing on antibodies and increased IEL because they've realized that developing villous atrophy can be a gradual process, and because people with earlier signs of celiac get dramatically healthier on a gluten-free diet. It's good medicine. :)

You do realize the epithelial lymphocytes are the ones that do the autoimmune celiac damage, right? That's a fairly new piece to the puzzle, figured out within the last five years or so. Your autoimmune antibodies have called natural killer cells to your intestine and they are there to attack your villi. It's only a matter of time before they do their work and you end up with a severe biopsy, but you don't want to go there. :blink:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,189
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bradley H
    Newest Member
    Bradley H
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Hi, @thejayland10, Do you still consume dairy?  Dairy can cause increased tTg IgA levels in some people with celiac disease who react to casein, the protein in dairy, just like to gluten.   You might try cutting out the processed gluten free foods.  Try a whole foods, no carbohydrate Paleo diet instead, like the AIP diet (the Autoimmune Protocol Diet by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself). Processed gluten free foods can be full of excess carbohydrates which can alter your microbiome leading to Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).  SIBO is found in some people who are not responding to a gluten free diet.  SIBO can elevate tTg IgA levels.  The AIP diet cuts out sources of carbohydrates like rice, potatoes (nightshades), quinoa, peas, lentils, legumes, which starves out the SIBO bacteria.  Better bacteria can then proliferate.   I followed the AIP diet to get rid of my SIBO.  It's a strict diet, but my digestive tract had time to rest and heal.  I started feeling better within a few days.  Feeling improvement so soon made sticking to the AIP diet much easier. References: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among patients with celiac disease unresponsive to a gluten free diet https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759221/   Luminal antigliadin antibodies in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9260801/#:~:text=Luminal total IgA concentrations (p,response to local bacterial antigens.   Potato glycoalkaloids adversely affect intestinal permeability and aggravate inflammatory bowel disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12479649/
    • trents
      First, welcome to the forum, @boy-wonder! Second, a little clarification in terminology is in order. Granted, inconsistency is rampant when it comes to the terminology associated with gluten disorders, but it has more or less become settled in this fashion: "Gluten intolerance" is a general term that car refer to either celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). "Gluten Sensitivity" is the shortened version of NCGS. Third, Celiac disease is not an allergy to gluten. It is an autoimmune disorder characterized by gluten ingestion causing the immunes system to attack the lining of the small bowel, causing damage to it over time due to the constant inflammation that wears down the "villi" (mucosal finger-like projections that make up the lining). Over a significant period of time as gluten continues to be consumed, this generally results in impaired nutrient absorption. There are specific blood antibody tests available to check for celiac disease but the testing will not be valid while on a reduced gluten diet or a gluten free diet. Those already having having begun a gluten free diet must go back to consuming generous amounts of gluten for a period of weeks if they wish to pursue testing for celiac disease. Fourth, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten from your life is the antidote for both. Fifth, you state that you are convince you don't have celiac disease by are just "gluten intolerant" (aka, gluten sensitive). How do you know that? It seems to me you are making a dangerous assumption here. I suggest you consider getting formally tested for celiac disease.
    • AllyJR
      Has anyone found a gluten free parakeet seed mix? I can't find a single one! My doctor wants me to make sure all pet food in the house is gluten free but I'm not sure if that's even possible with parakeets. We love our birds so much! I'm wondering if anyone has ever made their own bird seed mix if gluten free ones are not available. 
    • boy-wonder
      Hi, new member. About me, I had been suffering with weight gain, bloating and irregular and extreme bowel habits for a year or so. For example, I went on holiday in 2023, then again I  2024 at the same time of year and every shirt I wore in 2023 didn't fit anymore, couldn't even do the buttons up. Being in my mid 50s I put it down to age and middle aged spread. I'd been lucky all my life having good metabolism and being able to eat anything and as much as I like without putting on any weight, it drove my other half mad. Over a conversation with a friend health and age Related stuff came up and he mentioned someone he knew who had recently found out they were gluten intolerant,  I looked it up and had every one of 8 or so symptoms listed. Bloating,  weight gain,  headaches, brain fog,  constipation, etc etc. I took the decision to give going gluten free a try. Within 1 week I had lost 4 lb, now 7 weeks in I've lost 13 lb. I feel much better in general,  the bloating has severely subsided, it used to keep me awake at night as I felt so uncomfortable.  So pretty much a success story, as everyone here knows,  going gluten free isn't always easy, and eating out can be awkward,  but I consider myself lucky that I appear to have an intolerance rather than an allergy or being celiac.  I can deal with most of the gluten free options at the supermarket but, the big one for me is bread, I love bread, and the gluten free options I've tried are pretty poor. I was at a posh black tie event last night and chose all the food options I thought would be gluten free,  however,  there was bread on the table and I couldn't resist it, I had I small piece of bread,  god it was good, I wanted more but I resisted. Today I feel a bit dodgy, my stomach is churning, and I generally feel a bit urgh.  So here's the question, is that really down to 1 small piece of bread or is it coincidence?  I'd be interested in hearing how other people have reacted to a similar situation,  as I was considering having a day off every now and then and enjoying some lovely fresh bread.
    • ValerieC
      Does anybody know of a guide that ranks reevaluates universities and colleges in terms of their accommodation of celiac disease or food allergies?   Thanks in advance for any leads! Valerie 
×
×
  • Create New...