Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Celiac Reflexive Panel Adequate?


carriej82

Recommended Posts

carriej82 Rookie

My doctor originally ordered a Comprehensive Celiac Panel from LabCorps. I found out that would cost me over $500 on my high deductible family plan, and I couldn't swing it, so I've been desperately searching for less expensive options. All the time still eating gluten and feeling pretty miserable.

I was looking at INeedLabs.Com, but when I called my doctor's nurse to ask about it, she'd never heard of it. That didn't necessarily turn me away from the online route, they actually sounded completely legit when I talked to them on the phone. But my nurse did mention something I wasn't aware of: Regional Lab Outreach through my local hospital.

Regional Lab offers discounted tests for private pay patients. I called and they quote me 2 different tests. One was a Celiac Reflexive Panel. As I understand, they run an IgA an depending on that result they do one of two things. Here is the description: If IgA is less than 7 mg/dL, then tTG IgG and Gliadin Peptide IgG will be added. If IgA is greater than or equal to 7 mg/dL, then tTG IgA and Gliadin Peptide IgA will be added .

So apparently this is more cost effective than the other option, which is a Celiac Serology test which includes these values: Anti-gliadin IgG ELISA

Anti-gliadin IgA ELISA

Anti-human tTG IgA ELISA

Anti-endomysial(EMA) IgA IFA

Total serum IgA

Do I really need the comprehensive test? Can the relflexive test be enough to diagnose celiac disease? Will it tell me what I need to know? What would be the benefit of having the additional values in the comprehensive serology panel?

Any input appreciated! Thanks so much.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I can't really comment on the tests but I can say that :

You have found out one of the secrets of US medical care!

Offering to pay, in cash at the time of service can give you some bargaining power on cost. It costs a hospital a lot of money to bill insurance companies ( more than the cost of a person to send a bill ). I worked at a hospital that had 2 prices for mammograms - the cost to the insurance company and the cash paid at the time of testing (less).

Good luck.

Edited to say: didn't mean to sound like an infomercial on late night TV, :)

mushroom Proficient

As I mentioned on your new thread, (I went back to your profile and checked out your other posts) the full celiac panel consists of the following tests:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

This is apparently what the comprehensive celiac panel from LabCorps would offer. The reason for doing all the tests is that it is possible to be positive on some and negative on others. You only need to be positive on one to be celiac. The total serum IgA test is a control to make sure that the person being tested produces a normal quantity of IgA; if not, any IgA testing is invalid and they have to perform the IgG versions of the tests. The Ani-Gliadin tests are the older tests; the newest test and the one that seems to work best for children and be most specific for celiac is the DGP. If I am reading your post correctly, then the reflexive panel that Regional Lab is offering would first run the total serum IgA, and if that was in the low range, then they would run the IgG versions of the tTG and DGP. If the total serum IgA was normal, they would run the IgA versions of both the tTG and DGP. I would think that that would probably be a pretty good deal since those are the two tests most often used now. How much would they charge you for that?

carriej82 Rookie

As I mentioned on your new thread, (I went back to your profile and checked out your other posts) the full celiac panel consists of the following tests:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

This is apparently what the comprehensive celiac panel from LabCorps would offer. The reason for doing all the tests is that it is possible to be positive on some and negative on others. You only need to be positive on one to be celiac. The total serum IgA test is a control to make sure that the person being tested produces a normal quantity of IgA; if not, any IgA testing is invalid and they have to perform the IgG versions of the tests. The Ani-Gliadin tests are the older tests; the newest test and the one that seems to work best for children and be most specific for celiac is the DGP. If I am reading your post correctly, then the reflexive panel that Regional Lab is offering would first run the total serum IgA, and if that was in the low range, then they would run the IgG versions of the tTG and DGP. If the total serum IgA was normal, they would run the IgA versions of both the tTG and DGP. I would think that that would probably be a pretty good deal since those are the two tests most often used now. How much would they charge you for that?

Hmmm... I am trying really hard to follow this. :) All the different measurements really confuse me as to what they are. I need to do some serious reading on the IgA, IgG, tTg stuff so I can wrap my brain around it. I started this particular thread over a week ago when I was trying to decide the best way to afford testing with a ridiculously high-deductible. I did end up hauling my kids to the hospital Regional Lab location to try for the reflexive test. They had told me over the phone I would qualify for the uninsured price of $100 for the test, but turns out since I do have insurance they could not offer me that after all. I ended up walking away and looking into INeedLabs again, which is what I ultimately went with. They charged me $160 for a celiac panel through Labcorps.

According to my results page (I tried to copy and paste but won't let me) I was tested for the following levels:

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA - 3

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG - 3

tTg IgA <1

tTg IgG 2

Endomysial Anitobody Iga, Negative

Immunoglobulin,A, Qn, Serum 186

Is that the full panel? All were in the very low end of negative ranges. I had only been totally gluten-free for 3 or 4 days at a time last fall, and then 10 days in early January, and for 1 week in February. Otherwise was gluten-lite in fall and gluten heavy this year except for above mentioned periods.

Any thoughts? I take this to be non-celiac gluten sensitivity or intolerance (or whatever, is there a difference in sens or int?) I wonder if I should have my kids tested for celiac though before starting them on gluten-free diets to see if their behavioral issues improve

mushroom Proficient

Hmmm, your testing results do look thoroughly negative, sorry to say, Yes, that is the full panel except for the anti-gliadin which is falling into disuse anyway. So for 17 (approx) out of 60 days you were gluten free and you were gluten lite in fall and gluten free for 3-4 days at a time during that period. It is hard to say if that would have affected your results, but really, your scores were not even close even though you did not give the ranges the lab used. And your total serum IgA is solidly mid-range. It is certainly possible for you to be non-celiac gluten intolerant. If you could have one of your children tested who has been eating gluten all along that would be a useful validation of whether celiac is involved or if you are all non-celiac gluten intolerant. There is evidence showing that NCGI is also genetically based, same as celiac. Maybe the wee fellow you were recently talking about could be tested.

But it certainly sounds to me like your whole family needs to be eating gluten free with the symptoms they are showing (excluding your husband, of course, but to make it easy on you you should cook entirely gluten free at home and let him get his gluten fixes outside the house, otherwise you run the risk of cross-contamination and it will be too much work for you.!!)

carriej82 Rookie

Hmmm, your testing results do look thoroughly negative, sorry to say, Yes, that is the full panel except for the anti-gliadin which is falling into disuse anyway. So for 17 (approx) out of 60 days you were gluten free and you were gluten lite in fall and gluten free for 3-4 days at a time during that period. It is hard to say if that would have affected your results, but really, your scores were not even close even though you did not give the ranges the lab used. And your total serum IgA is solidly mid-range. It is certainly possible for you to be non-celiac gluten intolerant. If you could have one of your children tested who has been eating gluten all along that would be a useful validation of whether celiac is involved or if you are all non-celiac gluten intolerant. There is evidence showing that NCGI is also genetically based, same as celiac. Maybe the wee fellow you were recently talking about could be tested.

But it certainly sounds to me like your whole family needs to be eating gluten free with the symptoms they are showing (excluding your husband, of course, but to make it easy on you you should cook entirely gluten free at home and let him get his gluten fixes outside the house, otherwise you run the risk of cross-contamination and it will be too much work for you.!!)

I am hoping my husband will get tested! He actually has more of the classic celiac symptoms than I do... fatigue (he takes 5 to 6 hour naps during the day after a full night sleep) achy legs, tingly hands and feet, chronic D and multiple trips to restroom all day long, stomach aches, nausea, depression, low testosterone, hot flashes. He does complain about his health and has been in search for answers but his answers must be in the form of a pill, so far he is not very willing to consider food a likely cause of so much suffering.. especially a food so common as wheat. He eats fast food everyday (by choice, I offer to pack a healthy lunch) so I think really is kind of afraid of the possibility of something like Celiac being a reality for him. We've had some conversations and he is back and forth between not wanting to hear it and then being more softened toward the idea of just getting a quick blood draw. So we'll see... if his bloodwork were positive and I know I am intolerant my kids' symptoms might make even more sense!!

Thanks mushroom for your input! I am finding it so hard to stay away from these forums as I am new to this and with everything I read more questions pop into my mind. It is wonderful to be able to glean so much from others' experience and knowledge who have traveled this road for a longer time.

mushroom Proficient

Oh, you are more than welcome Carrie. I looked through your posts and saw that we hadn't been fully responding to you :( Yes, if Dad has symptoms too then your children could have gotten both celiac and NCGI genes from their parents. To have your son tested (and his dad) would be an interesting proposition, if you could talk dad into it. If his troubles are as you say he really should try going off gluten too, regardless of testing results. But ahh, a fast-food junkie is hard to convert :rolleyes: Let us know how things work out and what you decide. Feell free to ask any questions that "pop into your mind." :D


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,132
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cindy Ophaug
    Newest Member
    Cindy Ophaug
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...