Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Just Tested


banjos

Recommended Posts

banjos Newbie

hi everyone. i am new to all of this and looking for a little advice. i was tested for celiac, my dr. said it was a three panel test and two were negative but one was mildly positive. she said it was a 21 and negative is 19 and below. i've been searching the forum for others experiences with having tests come back as mildly positive or weakly positive. most seem to know the names of the tests (igg iga etc) but i didn't think to ask her. so she said that while she doesn't think i have celiac disease she wants me to get the biopsy done because of my very consistent low vitamin d levels (i'm on and off of very high doses to keep it up)

so it seems a little extreme to go through the biopsy for a weak positive. i'd be interested to hear other more experienced peoples opinions on if i should bother with the biopsy or maybe just try going gluten free for a little while? i'm pretty confused.

thanks in advance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

If I were you I'd go on with the biopsy. It would help if you knew which test but it's kind of hard to get a false positive celiac test. Sometimes there is a low positive test but a biopsy can turn out to be really clearly celiac.

I would want to have the extra information from a biopsy. I mean, what if there is autoimmune damage?

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

hi everyone. i am new to all of this and looking for a little advice. i was tested for celiac, my dr. said it was a three panel test and two were negative but one was mildly positive. she said it was a 21 and negative is 19 and below. i've been searching the forum for others experiences with having tests come back as mildly positive or weakly positive. most seem to know the names of the tests (igg iga etc) but i didn't think to ask her. so she said that while she doesn't think i have celiac disease she wants me to get the biopsy done because of my very consistent low vitamin d levels (i'm on and off of very high doses to keep it up)

so it seems a little extreme to go through the biopsy for a weak positive. i'd be interested to hear other more experienced peoples opinions on if i should bother with the biopsy or maybe just try going gluten free for a little while? i'm pretty confused.

thanks in advance!

I'd get the endoscope. Your blood test might be mildly positive, which might not keep you from consuming gluten? If you get the scope you can get a better picture of whether this is affecting your health?

If you decide to not get the scope..will you go gluten-free..or wait until there's more damage and a higher test score(some Dr.s actually recommend this!)? If it was caught early you will have saved yourself from all sorts of health issues.

banjos Newbie

thank you for the replies!

my thinking is that regardless of the endoscope i will go gluten free for 3 months and see how i do. i feel like i've read so many experiences where people have had the endoscope and it turns out negative yet they go gluten free and feel so much better. i almost feel like the weak positive blood test and my symptoms are enough to warrant going gluten-free yet maybe if i get negative endoscope it would deter me from going gluten-free (i hope that makes sense!)

i actually have a best friend who is gluten intolerant and has been telling me for a while that she thinks something is up with me and gluten. she and my dr. both have said how you feel off gluten as opposed to on is probably the biggest indicator of what you should do.

also, i feel like not all of my symptoms are exactly what you would see on the celiac list of symptoms. so i think it's been hard for me to actually admit that maybe this is what's going on. and maybe i think i feel better than i actually do? like once i go gluten-free i will actually feel good and realize how bad i am feeling now. kind of like how you get used to feeling bad?

banjos Newbie

oh and i just talked to my dr.'s nurse and she said the test that was weak positive was the Deamidated Gliadin IgA. i have a 21 and 19 or less is considered negative.

is this a pretty sensitive test?

nora-n Rookie

this is a new and very specific test.

Now were you off gluten off and on beforehand?

That could explain the low numbers.

banjos Newbie

the only time i was ever off gluten was for a week when i did this clean eating cleanse (i basically ate protein, veggies, fruit) no dairy no bread. i do actually remember feeling kinda crappy for the first two days but then felt amazing the rest of the week. (ha! maybe that should be a good indicator!) but then went back to my normal eating after that. i would say that was like the first week in march.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

thank you for the replies!

my thinking is that regardless of the endoscope i will go gluten free for 3 months and see how i do. i feel like i've read so many experiences where people have had the endoscope and it turns out negative yet they go gluten free and feel so much better. i almost feel like the weak positive blood test and my symptoms are enough to warrant going gluten-free yet maybe if i get negative endoscope it would deter me from going gluten-free (i hope that makes sense!)

No, you can't just go gluten-free for three months and see how you do. If you decline the endoscopy you must accept that you have celiac disease because the DGP test is 98% specific. You will be strictly gluten-free for life.

banjos Newbie

No, you can't just go gluten-free for three months and see how you do. If you decline the endoscopy you must accept that you have celiac disease because the DGP test is 98% specific. You will be strictly gluten-free for life.

thanks for your reply! i understand that you can't have the endo once gluten free or rather you would have to go back to eating gluten to get the correct results from the endo. but what i mean is that i would go gluten free to see how i feel - if symptoms subside then i would remain on the gluten free diet.

but you are pretty much saying that even the weak positive test indicates that i should be on a gluten free diet?

Skylark Collaborator

The weak positive is still likely an indicator of celiac disease. I misspoke earlier because I missed that the test was DGP-IgA rather than IgG. The specificity on that one is not as high as some of the other tests unless you are IgA deficient. Are you? If you have normal total IgA the specificity is more like 85%.

As I said, if you decline the endoscopy you need to be prepared to live as if you have celiac disease. You can't just say "I don't feel much different so I'm going to eat gluten again". Without knowing for sure whether or not you're celiac eating gluten risks all the problems of untreated celiac like other autoimmunity, osteoporosis, cancer, etc. If I were you I'd get the endoscopy now so you know for sure what you're dealing with.

This IS indication of your immune system recognizing gluten, no matter what the endoscopy results are. You also have to make a decision as to whether you are interested in eating gluten given that your immune system is reacting to it.

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

If you test positive it's a good indication that you should be gluten-free? It would be good to have the scope now though, because it could show if there are other things going on? It also shows the state of your intestine right now. Sometimes they find ulcers, or other things that should be treated so that you truly get well on the gluten-free diet.

If the scope shows no damage..that's great! It means the Celiac was caught early. :D

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

The DGP test is often positive before the TtG. Mine was 89 and my TtG was normal. My Endoscopy was normal, and my GI dismissed me....nothing wrong. My rheumatologist took one look at my DGP and said I had Celiac, no doubt. Biopsies are not accurate unless you have extensive intestinal damage or you get lucky and they happen to biopsy a bad spot. I have 4 of the 5 criteria (positive bood test, positive genes, symptoms consistent with Celiac, and positive response to gluten free diet). It would be pretty ridiculous to just say I don't have celiac just because they didn't get anything on biopsy!!!

It sounds like you may have latent celiac, which means your body hasn't done too much damage to your gut yet. Try going gluten free and see how you feel. I bet you will be pleasantly surprised!

banjos Newbie

thank you all for your replies. it's making more sense now. i've decided to go ahead and get the biopsy. i have it scheduled for next week. i also think that regardless of the results i will be going gluten free.

banjos Newbie

just had my endoscopy earlier today. wasn't as bad as i thought it would be. i'm still a little loopy and tired but i feel ok.

i got the initial results that say:

1. irregular z line

2 mild scalloping of the mucosal folds in the second portion of the duodenum - biopsied

they said i need to await pathology results and wouldn't confirm or deny celiac.

so it looks like tho that scalloping is an indication of celiac?

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I would wait for the biopsy report, since they are looking for microscopic damage. However, they do see damage...milk and soy are sometimes listed as alternative causes of damage on lab reports. If you had a positive serological test that was Celiac specific I'd say yes, you probably already have your answer.

Glad you feel ok, hope the loopy goes away soon.

Skylark Collaborator

Scalloping is common with celiac. You'll have to wait for the full report though.

banjos Newbie

i'm curious if it is possible to have scalloping yet the biopsy be completely normal? has anyone had that experience?

  • 2 weeks later...
banjos Newbie

just spoke to my dr's nurse. and i have to say i'm a little frustrated. they said that based on my endoscopy i am probably negative for celiac (which is fine if i completely believed them). she said that i basically have ibs and shouldn't eat gluten OR dairy. obviously, i need to talk to my dr. i also asked for them to send me a the diagnostic report.

i'm just feeling so confused! i feel like i've been thrown into this - i was tested on a whim from my dr and then to get a mild positive blood test and have the visual scalloping - i would have never thought that i was gluten intolerant before getting the testing done. but now that i am not eating gluten i am already seeing a difference in symptoms. i feel like i didn't realize how bad i felt until now. so this kind of feels like one big mind game - like is something wrong with me for real or am i just imagining things?

also, i asked how many samples they took from the endoscopy and she said two. from what i've read that doesn't seem like enough to definitively diagnose positive or negative.

i'm not going back on gluten and will be going off dairy as well (although i'm not exactly sure why yet - at least with the dairy). but i feel like after reading what so many others have gone through trying to get a proper diagnosis that i'm dealing with dr's that aren't as up to speed or educated on diagnosing this. like maybe another dr. might interpret my results differently. and that's another thing - aside from the gene testing it seems as though diagnosis is left up to the dr's to interpretation - like there is this huge grey area in diagnosing.

beachbirdie Contributor

just spoke to my dr's nurse. and i have to say i'm a little frustrated. they said that based on my endoscopy i am probably negative for celiac (which is fine if i completely believed them). she said that i basically have ibs and shouldn't eat gluten OR dairy. obviously, i need to talk to my dr. i also asked for them to send me a the diagnostic report.

i'm just feeling so confused! i feel like i've been thrown into this - i was tested on a whim from my dr and then to get a mild positive blood test and have the visual scalloping - i would have never thought that i was gluten intolerant before getting the testing done. but now that i am not eating gluten i am already seeing a difference in symptoms. i feel like i didn't realize how bad i felt until now. so this kind of feels like one big mind game - like is something wrong with me for real or am i just imagining things?

also, i asked how many samples they took from the endoscopy and she said two. from what i've read that doesn't seem like enough to definitively diagnose positive or negative.

i'm not going back on gluten and will be going off dairy as well (although i'm not exactly sure why yet - at least with the dairy). but i feel like after reading what so many others have gone through trying to get a proper diagnosis that i'm dealing with dr's that aren't as up to speed or educated on diagnosing this. like maybe another dr. might interpret my results differently. and that's another thing - aside from the gene testing it seems as though diagnosis is left up to the dr's to interpretation - like there is this huge grey area in diagnosing.

You are correct, two biopsy samples are insufficient. The damage can be patchy, and with so few samples they easily miss it. Also, there is a lot riding on the skill of the doc who takes the samples, as well as the pathologist who interprets. If I heard "probably" negative, I would feel very insecure.

If you feel good off gluten, sounds like a good thing.

Do you *need* a doctor's diagnosis for a particular reason? If so, sounds like a new doc might be more helpful. If not, and gluten-free living takes care of your symptoms, that sounds like a good choice.

Skylark Collaborator

i'm just feeling so confused! i feel like i've been thrown into this - i was tested on a whim from my dr and then to get a mild positive blood test and have the visual scalloping - i would have never thought that i was gluten intolerant before getting the testing done. but now that i am not eating gluten i am already seeing a difference in symptoms. i feel like i didn't realize how bad i felt until now. so this kind of feels like one big mind game - like is something wrong with me for real or am i just imagining things?

Trust yourself! It's not unusual to realize you always felt kind of bad when you go off gluten. Enjoy feeling better. :)

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

And if it's "probably negative" based on the naked eye that's not diagnostic. They look for microscopic damage when the lab reviews the samples and writes the report.

banjos Newbie

thanks everyone. i guess i don't *need* a solid diagnosis. the only thing that concerns me is that celiac is genetic and i do have a son. although he eats a gluten full diet and has no problems that would warrant concern.

part of me wanted them to say yes, it's positive because then it makes it a little more real. but i am absolutely going to remain gluten-free for 3 months and see how i feel at the end of it.

the probably negative was based on the two samples they took from my small intestine. i haven't actually seen the report or even talked to my dr yet - the nurse (who didn't really seem to know much about it and just read the results off of a sheet of paper) let me know. so we will see what my dr says, i'm really curious as to why she is recommending no gluten or dairy if the test was negative?

also, with the blood tests - is it possible to have a complete zero of gluten antibodies? or does everyone have a little? i'm just wondering because my test was mild positive and maybe that's not that big of a deal?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,749
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PixieDixie
    Newest Member
    PixieDixie
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @PixieDixie! 1. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder. The body mistakenly identifies gluten as a threat and sends attacker cells to the lining of the small bowel when gluten is ingested, causing inflammation which, over time, begins to damage the "villous lining" of the small bowel. The villous lining of the small bowel is made up of millions millions of tiny finger-like projections which make up a huge nutrient absorbing surface to absorb the vitamins and minerals found in the food we eat. With the increasing damage caused by this ongoing inflammation, these millions and millions of tiny finger-like projections get worn down to nubbins and the absorbing efficiency of the villous lining becomes less and less. Over a significant period of time, this can lead to medical problems that are tied to nutrient deficiencies. NCGS (or "gluten sensitivity") does not produce an autoimmune reaction and so does not damage the villous lining of the small bowel. The exact immune system engagement represented by NCGS is poorly understood at this point in time. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease and it is 10x more common than celiac disease. The GI distress symptoms of NCGS are similar to that of celiac disease, however, and there is not testing available yet for NCGS. There is testing available for celiac disease, on the other hand, and it is often necessary to get formal testing done for celiac disease to either confirm it or rule it out in order to arrive at an official diagnosis of NCGS. 2. Celiac disease testing is invalidated once a person has embarked on a gluten free diet. One must have been eating significant quantities of gluten (equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily) for weeks or months leading up to the day of testing in order for the testing to yield reliable results. 3. The rash associated with celiac disease is known as dermatitis herpetiformis. Celiac disease is the only known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis and if you can get a dermatologist to diagnose the rash as dermatitis herpetiformis then you can be assured you have celiac disease. The rash is characterized by having pustules in the bumps. dermatitis herpetiformis must be biopsied during an active breakout and this can make it difficult to get diagnosed sense it is usually difficult to get a dermatology appointment on short notice. And it is also true that not all dermatologists know how to properly biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis. One mistake they often make is taking the sample from the bump whereas it needs to be taken from an area next to a bump. Most people with dermatitis herpetiformis also have GI involvement but they may not discern it due to lack of symptoms. They are what we call "silent celiacs" and this is much more common than you might think. A small percentage of those with dermatitis herpetiformis have only an epidermal expression of celiac disease and have no GI involvement.
    • PixieDixie
      I have a couple of questions. What si the difference between NCGS and Celiac? I have had a rash that typical rash meds could not get rid of and recently realized gluten is likely as going gluten free has relieved the itchiness and the rash is starting to dissipate and is less, not gone, but maybe headed that way. The oldest parts of the rash that are gone left my skin a darker color. Are rashes associated with NCGS.  I’m fairly certain gluten is the culprit for this. Is the rash a distinguishable feature of celiac?
    • CelluloseSick
    • PA Painter
      Hi Celiac has been ruled out with a biopsy. I am so sensitive that I cannot eat most processed food. One bite sends me into three to five days of a disabling shoulder, neck, headache, stabbing & burning toes, ankles, knuckles, and wrists. I finally discovered that a whole food and gluten free approach has given much needed relief after years of agony. My nerves can finally repair  without the threat of inflaming over and over any more. The cognitive symptoms I have experienced are frightening to say the least. This is totally reproducible with food that has residual wheat on it much less actually eat wheat directly. They don't even know if this is caused by gluten. My reaction is innate only. I get barely any stomach problems, only hot snakes and acid reflux. I think this may be a direct cause of long term GMO sheet IDK. I can't touch it and am not celiac. I wish I had a forum.😞
    • Scott Adams
      Did you look up your meds on the government website I shared? It should list all additives.
×
×
  • Create New...