Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pretty Sure This Is Negative Results But Please Take A Look


MoMof2Boyz

Recommended Posts

MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

for my almost 14 year old son.

(DGP IgG) 0.7 range <4.9

(DGP IgA)<.1 range <6.1

(TTG IgA) <.1 range <10.3

(EMA IgA) negative

total serum IgA 17 so from some emails last year(I had saved them) Dr. Guandalini says that an IgA of 20 or above is not considered IgA deficient...so going by 17 this would be considered defecient?? ages 3-13 range is 41-395 and ages 13 to adult range is 44-441

looks like he had some gene testing done

DQ2- DQ8- increased risk <0.1x relative risk extremely low

food allergy panel came back

milk(flagged high)

peanuts(flagged high)

wheat(flagged high)

all the other stuff he was right at the range given so like for egg white his results were <.35 and the range is <.35

so any comments any advice?? our next appointment isn't for a few weeks and the nurse told me not to read too much into this. the food allergy results make total sense, drinks lots of milk, eats pband j for lunch on wheat bread everyday....

oh and just in case, my ds ismoody/figure itmight be hormones though, very thin think stick thin, no body fat(doc even notes 0% body fat on his medical chart) constipation, redness under his eyes, low iron. thanks again for any help


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

With an IgA of 17 and a range of thirteen to adult 44 - 441, your son is IgA deficient (and even with Dr. Guandalini adjusting the range to less than 20, he is still under.) This means to me that his IgA testing is not valid and they need to do the IgG versions. His symptoms certainly sound spot on for celiac. Is there any way of getting retesting sooner with the IgG versions? Ask the nurse.

Skylark Collaborator

What shroomie said. He needs TTG-IgG and EMA-IgG. He needs to continue eating wheat for valid testing so you might want to call and see if they can arrange the labs sooner.

MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

ok, thank you both, I will ask for those versions of the test.

can someone tell what the difference between these are? (the IgG compared with the IgA thanks!)

Skylark Collaborator

They are different types of antibodies. Your son doesn't make enough IgA for the tests to be valid, whether or not the doctor decides to diagnose him as IgA deficient. That means he needs the IgG version of the test.

MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

Hi everyone! Just one more question, if my son's DGP IgG is positive(but not a very high positive) would that indicate celiac?

Skylark Collaborator

Yes, that would indicate celiac. DGP-IgG is very specific.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

Yes, that would indicate celiac. DGP-IgG is very specific.

Really?!! In your opinion, is a DGP IgG of 0.7 range <4.9 a positive? just trying to understand this all better.

thanks!

Skylark Collaborator

Really?!! In your opinion, is a DGP IgG of 0.7 range <4.9 a positive? just trying to understand this all better.

thanks!

Sorry, I thought you were asking theoretically or maybe about someone else's test. Your son's test is not positive at all. It is negative, and low-negative at that. 0.7 is considerably below the 4.9 cutoff.

MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

Sorry, I thought you were asking theoretically or maybe about someone else's test. Your son's test is not positive at all. It is negative, and low-negative at that. 0.7 is considerably below the 4.9 cutoff.

thanks, sometimes this stuff can be hard to understand :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,117
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mizscarlett
    Newest Member
    Mizscarlett
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...