Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Should I Proceed?


birdie22

Recommended Posts

birdie22 Enthusiast

If you've followed any of my prior threads you'll know that I'm blood test negative (had total IGA, tTg, dgp, etc) who has had a host of symptoms (nausea, headaches, canker sores, dizzy/buzzed, bloating and distention w/ epigastric pain, crushing fatigue, heartburn (but not reflux), cystic acne, tingling in fingers on rt hand) since Nov 2010. I started pursuing causes in June 2011. After several trial elimination diets I went gluten-free for a prolonged period in Nov 2011. I did a 5 day gluten challenge in Feb and a 7 day challenge just a few weeks ago. Though my symptoms didn't go away completely prior to the challenge they did see some improvement and clear regression with the gluten challenge. I'm fairly certain gluten is the cause of my issues and happy to remain gluten-free. That brings me to my question. I have a follow up with my primary care physician tomorrow. In the almost 1 year of guessing my issue I've done just about everything but be referred to a GI. I've done CT scans and barium swallows, xrays, ultrasounds of my pelvic region, and many many blood tests.

Given my symptoms, response to diet, and neg blood should I:

1. ask for a GI referral and likely go back on gluten for an endoscopy?

2. ask for genetic testing? I have 2 daughters, both very tiny, both with sometimes bloated bellies, one with chronic constipation and canker sores (though not frequently). Gene testing could be a piece of the puzzle for me and for them? I did ask her about this previously but she dismissed it since my other blood work was negative.

or

3. thank my pcp for her work (or lack there of), call myself NCGI, and go about my merry way?

I honestly can't decide what my next best course of action is. I'm leaning towards #2 since it doesn't require my ingestion of gluten and could help give some possible answers for my daughters w/out having to subject a 2yo and 4yo to unnecessary blood tests if I don't carry known common genes (and yes I know that's not a foolproof diagnostic answer/tool).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

Well, being biased against the standard western medical industry, I'd just take the family gluten-free along with yourself, and stick with it for an extended period of time. It can require much longer than a week or two before you begin to feel appreciably better. For example, it took six months before I noticed anything aside from the one immediate symptom I had, which was unquenchable thirst after eating certain breads.

Since tests in young children are even more unreliable than for adults, it may not provide any useful information to get your children tested at this time. And, just because your tests have been negative doesn't mean you don't have Celiac. But, if a gluten-free diet proves helpful, then by all means stick with it regardless. It does sound like your children may benefit from a gluten-free diet. It cannot hurt, and may be the best thing you can do for their long-term health.

If you feel that getting an "official" diagnosis is important to you, then pursue it. Just remember to always trust what your body tells you over what tests may indicate.

Keep in mind that dairy is also often not tolerated, so you may need to avoid that at the same time. Other offenders may include soy, corn, eggs, nuts, and the other top allergens. Some folks are able to add some/all of these back into their diet after sufficient healing has taken place, while others cannot.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,383
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    haleyspurlock1
    Newest Member
    haleyspurlock1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
    • Levi
      When I was first Dg’d I researched like mad. One thing I remember from then, which may have changed with advancement in medical science, is that Coeliac is a first generation disease which means either you or your husband need be Coeliac for your daughter to have inherited it. Far as I know, and I’m not a scientist just a victim, the amount of gluten (wheat, rye, or barley) one consumes does not cause a person to contract Coeliac Disease. So if neither of you as her biological parents have Coeliac then your daughter cannot pass any blame should she contract this horrific disease.     It’s humbling, and sometimes I believe GOD allows such as these autoimmune diseases for those who need it most. 
    • Lori Lavell
      The body reacts to all grain proteins in all grains from my observation. Call it Gluten, Gliadin, which is what they test for commonly, however, I am Celiac and react with dermatitis herpetiformis to corn and the glutenous protein in it is called Zein. They only test for Gliadin. Testing needs to be updated in my opinion. It only take a small parts per million to continuously create systemic inflammation. This is not productive to healing and all grains contain some for gluten like substance. It's called Molecular Mimicry.
×
×
  • Create New...