Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Quickly Should Blood Tests Results Return To Normal After Starting Gluten-Free Diet?


CSherm

Recommended Posts

CSherm Newbie

I was diagnosed wth Celiac last September, following a biopsy taken in connection with an endoscopy for an unrelated issue. When the biopsy results came back positive, My GI ordered blood work to confirm.

I'm not sure what the name of the test was but the lab report says "Celiac screen detects IgA and IgC antibodies to deamidated gliadin and tissue transglutaminase." The interpretation is normal at levels less than 20, weak positive 20-30 and positive for over 30.

My result in September was 211.

I have been on a gluten-free diet since then and am as careful as I can be. I have not knowingly eaten anything with gluten since then, and I am careful with label reading, food prep and restaurant choices. But because I have no "traditional" symptoms, it is hard to know if/when I have a cc issue. Some of my symptoms seem to have been helped by the diet, others not so much.

Following my dietician's advice (to repeat the blood test 6 months out) I asked my GI to order a new test two weeks ago, to see if my "levels" have returned to normal. The result of that test was 42. Much lower than 211, but still significantly positive.

I know that the damage that celiac causes to the small intestines can take time to heal. But I assume that the blood work should return to normal fairly quickly on a gluten-free diet, at least within 8 months between the tests.

I can think of three possibile causes for my positive result:

1. Despite not having traditional symptoms, I am highly sensitive, so that very small and infrequent cc issues are keeping my levels high.

2. My levels are in the process of going down and I'm doing fine with my diet, it just takes more than 8 months to go from 211 to below 20.

3. Something other than gluten else is causing the positive result. According to several sources I have read, a few other autoimmune issues can cause positive results.

So my main question is how long should it take for the blood test result to be normal after adopting a gluten-free diet? The answer to that question will help me decide whether to simply retest in six months, whether to consider other causes, or whether to tighten up what is already a pretty rigid gluten-free diet.

Thanks for your help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BabsV Enthusiast

I would say there is no magic time frame that everyone falls under...depends on how high your levels were to begin with, how long you were sick, how your body heals, how strict you are about the diet, accidental glutenings, etc.

As six months I was much closer to the 'negative/normal' range but still slightly above it. As my levels were going in the right direction (DOWN!), and I had improvement in most of my symptoms the doctor who read my tests told me that I was on the right track and to continue what I was doing. He said to re-test at 1 year gluten-free to see how the numbers looked then. He said he would only worry if it had been 2 years (!) and I was still not in the 'negative/normal' range. He also said adults often take longer to 'heal' than children.

I'm not a medical professional but from the numbers you posted it looks like you're on the right track and have had a sizable decrease in your levels. Yay! If it is really worrying you, you take a moment to make sure you aren't getting 'hidden' gluten from something -- are all your meds (assuming you take some) gluten-free? What about lip balm, etc? Any chance of trace gluten getting you from CC issues in a shared kitchen? Do you eat out a lot? If none of that seems to apply it may simply take you a little more time. I wish that when I'd been given my diagnosis I'd been given a stern lecture on being patient because I've wanted everything to be better in a much shorter length of time that it is taking me to heal. This is obviously some sort of life lesson I needed to learn! :o

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

I think it is different for each person.

My blood test went from positive to negative within two weeks of being gluten free.

My son's numbers barely moved after 6 months. At that time we "stepped it up" a bit, eliminating "questionable" things like gluten-free food that was "processed in a facility that handles wheat" and we stopped eating out - even if the place had a gluten-free menu (unless it was 100% gluten free). At his 1 year test, he is finally in the "normal" range. He is only 7 and does not have any physical symptoms so it was very hard to tell if we were doing it right. Turns out he just needed more time.

Cara

CSherm Newbie

Thanks for the responses. After I submitted my post I saw an earlier thread addressing a similar issue, and it does look like the consensus is that everyone is different.

I think I may keep my current routine for another few months and see where I am. If I'm still in the positive range I will look into places where I can tighten things up with my food strategies.

Thanks again for your responses.

mushroom Proficient

I think that from 211 to 42 is a massive drop!! Healing does not occur according to a doctor's preconceived time schedule. So long as you are keeping the gluten out the numbers will continue to go down, I am sure. Stay with the program!! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,231
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ethan710
    Newest Member
    ethan710
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Liquid lunch
      I had these for years, covered in scars from them. Not had any since I started taking reishi and cordyceps tincture, they’re immune modulators, I think that’s how they work. Most of my other symptoms have also disappeared, I take a treble dose if I get glutened and it’s almost an instant fix, 3 days of mild symptoms instead of 3 weeks of horrible. Might be worth a try, don’t be put off by the caterpillars, I think they’ve found a different way of growing them now. 
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @LookingForAnswers101, I had similar experiences with boil outbreaks in the same areas.  Mine was caused by Candida Albicans and eating a diet too high in sugar and simple carbohydrates.   Candida is a yeast infection, so the antibacterial wash is not going to help.  I had to change my diet to a Paleo diet before it went away.  If I consume high levels of sugar or other simple carbohydrates (rice, corn, dairy, etc.), boils would occur at pressure points like the groin and back of the legs.  Your doctor might be able to prescribe an antifungal medication, but some of those antifungal medications destroy thiamine.  Thiamine is needed to keep fungal and bacterial infections in check.  I took Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine, but TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) will work, too.   Thiamine, and the other B vitamins, especially Niacin and Biotin, along with Vitamin A, Vitamin C, and Vitamin D will help keep skin healthy.  Be sure to address these nutritional deficiencies that occur with Celiac! Ask your doctor to rule out autoimmune hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and Human Papilloma virus, too.   Hang in there!  You'll get over this rocky patch of the journey!  Best wishes! P. S.  Get checked for Type Two Diabetes as well.  Candida, type two diabetes and a high carbohydrate diet often go together.  A Paleo diet really helps me with my Type Two Diabetes and Candida overgrowth.
    • Scott Adams
      As I mentioned, gluten intolerance encompasses more than just those with celiac disease, and in the past was used more like the term "gluten sensitivity" is used today.
    • Scott Adams
      By the way, have you been diagnosed with celiac disease, and if so, are you on a 100% gluten-free diet?
    • Ryangf
      I haven’t had any noticeable reactions to salt so I will continue using it. I think I just freaked out when I realized this but it doesn’t cause me any discomfort- so thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...