Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Question


flex9198

Recommended Posts

flex9198 Newbie

Hi All -

Quick question...I got an EMA, TTG IGA, DGP IGG and IGA and Total IGA test last Monday (that all came back negative). Prior to that, I went gluten free for about 5/6 days. Would that cause a false negative?

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I don't think it would affect it that quickly but I'm not sure. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable can comment.

I would guess that you really are negative for celiac, but that doesn't mean you aren't intolerant or sensitive to gluten.

squirmingitch Veteran

Yes, it could certainly skew the tests. Sorry to tell you.

Why don't you post the test results anyway along with the reference ranges. It might give some clue. Or if your total IGA was off then you could be IGA deficient which could mean the rest of the tests will not show correctly.

And finally, like nvsmom says you could still be non celiac gluten intolerant. And that can make you very sick.

flex9198 Newbie

Yes, it could certainly skew the tests. Sorry to tell you.

Why don't you post the test results anyway along with the reference ranges. It might give some clue. Or if your total IGA was off then you could be IGA deficient which could mean the rest of the tests will not show correctly.

And finally, like nvsmom says you could still be non celiac gluten intolerant. And that can make you very sick.

Thanks for the reply! My results were as follows:

IGA, Serum - Negative (I was 280 and the ref range is 84 to 463)

TTG AB IGA - Negative (I was <3 and the ref range is <5)

EMA - Negative

Gliadin Deamidated (DGP) IGG - Negative (I was 3 and the ref range is <20)

Gliadin Deamidated (DGP) IGA - Negative (I was 4 and the ref range is <20)

I had a Gliadin IgG done two weeks prior to that test and it came back positive (but iga and ema were negative) and it was 84 (ref range of <20). But I don't know if that was a DGP or an AGA (that test was done by BioReference and the most recent test above was done by Quest).

Thanks!

squirmingitch Veteran

Well, I'm no expert on interpreting the very fine points of the tests but others here are very good at spotting discrepancies. Keeping in mind that the 5-6 days gluten-free may have blown the test; it looks to me like it's negative. Now, there is a 20% false neg. rate (maybe a little more than that) anyway. But you could still have problems with gluten. Try the gluten-free diet & see if things improve for you. You have nothing to loose & everything to gain.

flex9198 Newbie

Well, I'm no expert on interpreting the very fine points of the tests but others here are very good at spotting discrepancies. Keeping in mind that the 5-6 days gluten-free may have blown the test; it looks to me like it's negative. Now, there is a 20% false neg. rate (maybe a little more than that) anyway. But you could still have problems with gluten. Try the gluten-free diet & see if things improve for you. You have nothing to loose & everything to gain.

Thanks for the advice! I don't have a negative reaction to gluten (I thought I was a "silent" celiac). So whether I'm on or off gluten really won't have any overt physical effects. I'm going to stay on a gluten containing diet for a few months and then get re-tested. I've done extensive research on the different types of tests and I'm assuming that I am gluten sensitive but not celiac (crossing my fingers). I've come to this conclusion because my initial IgG Test was positive but I believe that one to be a AGA IgG and not the more accurate, more celiac specific, DGP IgG test.

squirmingitch Veteran

Sounds like a plan to me!smile.gif


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

Do you have low vitamin D or other issues like low iron etc? High liver numbers? A rash from gluten or Dermatitis herpetiformis, or neuro issues from gluten?

I notice your AGA was positive.

roxieb73 Contributor

Do you have low vitamin D or other issues like low iron etc? High liver numbers? A rash from gluten or Dermatitis herpetiformis, or neuro issues from gluten?

I notice your AGA was positive.

Nora I love your question here...... lol I have ALL of the above.

Ok my 2 cents for what it is worth. I think since you had a positive result pre gluten free and negative afterward a gluten challenge is in order. I only say that because it sounds like you are one of the rare people who can actually withstand it without getting sick. IMHO

Roxie

flex9198 Newbie

Do you have low vitamin D or other issues like low iron etc? High liver numbers? A rash from gluten or Dermatitis herpetiformis, or neuro issues from gluten?

I notice your AGA was positive.

none of the above except high liver but that came back down to normal very quickly (before i went off gluten for a few days).

flex9198 Newbie

Do you have low vitamin D or other issues like low iron etc? High liver numbers? A rash from gluten or Dermatitis herpetiformis, or neuro issues from gluten?

I notice your AGA was positive.

Also, I've read that a positive AGA IGG could either be celiac or just gluten sensitivity (without the damage to your vili) while the DGP IGG test is celiac specific (which mine was negative).

nora-n Rookie

those with neuro issues from gluten, have ttg-6 antibodies, DH have ttg-3 antibodies (but we do not get those tests)

Hadjivassiliou found that gluten ataxia patients often have antigliadin antibodies. Now when they often have phased out AGA testing, those with neuro issues and AGA will have the more specific tests for celiac in the gut, and miss celiac in the skin or the brain.....

roxieb73 Contributor

those with neuro issues from gluten, have ttg-6 antibodies, DH have ttg-3 antibodies (but we do not get those tests)

Hadjivassiliou found that gluten ataxia patients often have antigliadin antibodies. Now when they often have phased out AGA testing, those with neuro issues and AGA will have the more specific tests for celiac in the gut, and miss celiac in the skin or the brain.....

Do you happen to know about Lichen Planus? I have been told that is an autoimmune gluten rash similar to DH but not exclusive to Celiac. Of course they have just begun research. That is the rash I have. Curious just because I love to learn about these things where do you find this information? What is ttg-3&6?

nora-n Rookie

ttg-3 is tissue transglutaminase 3 for example.

The one for gut celiac is tissue transglutaminase 2.

I have not run across Lichen Planus.

But another thing related to gluten is HS, Hidradenitis Herpetiformis and doctors do not know about the connection.

So lots of things are gluten related, like sometimes pancreatitis and migraines

Skylark Collaborator

Also, I've read that a positive AGA IGG could either be celiac or just gluten sensitivity (without the damage to your vili) while the DGP IGG test is celiac specific (which mine was negative).

I've read the same, particularly with IgG rather than IgA in someone with normal IgA. I find it hard to imagine that gluten-free for only 5-6 days would throw off the rest of your celiac panel.

flex9198 Newbie

I've read the same, particularly with IgG rather than IgA in someone with normal IgA. I find it hard to imagine that gluten-free for only 5-6 days would throw off the rest of your celiac panel.

Thanks!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,383
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    haleyspurlock1
    Newest Member
    haleyspurlock1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
    • Levi
      When I was first Dg’d I researched like mad. One thing I remember from then, which may have changed with advancement in medical science, is that Coeliac is a first generation disease which means either you or your husband need be Coeliac for your daughter to have inherited it. Far as I know, and I’m not a scientist just a victim, the amount of gluten (wheat, rye, or barley) one consumes does not cause a person to contract Coeliac Disease. So if neither of you as her biological parents have Coeliac then your daughter cannot pass any blame should she contract this horrific disease.     It’s humbling, and sometimes I believe GOD allows such as these autoimmune diseases for those who need it most. 
    • Lori Lavell
      The body reacts to all grain proteins in all grains from my observation. Call it Gluten, Gliadin, which is what they test for commonly, however, I am Celiac and react with dermatitis herpetiformis to corn and the glutenous protein in it is called Zein. They only test for Gliadin. Testing needs to be updated in my opinion. It only take a small parts per million to continuously create systemic inflammation. This is not productive to healing and all grains contain some for gluten like substance. It's called Molecular Mimicry.
×
×
  • Create New...