Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Explain Ema Testing


Mom-of-Two

Recommended Posts

Mom-of-Two Contributor

Can someone explain EMA testing to me? My daughter had elevated tTG back in April (tested b/c I have it), had a normal biopsy in May. Doc said stay on gluten, no damage, no celiac. Didn't like that advice, got a second opinion and he basically said the same but was way more willing to search for a diagnosis. Re-ran tTG (had been 3 mos since initial tTG), ran EMA, vitamin D and iron, CBC. She had been gluten free at home about 2-3 weeks prior to the tests though. Her tTG was 44 (<20 normal) so down from 78.20 likely because oflower gluten diet 2-3 weeks.

Her EMA was 1:40 with a normal range of < 1:10 dilution. GI said she is "mildly positive" on EMA- ? Don't ou either have endomysial antibodies or not???? And regardless of the value, having them is quite specific to celiac, yes? I don't understand the EMA values, can anyone clarify?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

To do an EMA, they put the test subjects blood on a slice of monkey intestine (going from memory here, may not be exact). they wash off the blood (probably serum) and then see how much endomysial antibody stuck. If they can dilute the serum (1:10, 1:40, etc) and still get a reading of some EMA, then the test subject had a lot of EMA to start with.

Does this make sense? Think about putting one drop of coke into 10 drops of water - is it still brown? What if you put it into 40 drops of water? That's the idea behind dilution antibody testing, how much can you dilute it and still find it? A lot = very positive, not at all = negative.

beachbirdie Contributor

Can someone explain EMA testing to me? My daughter had elevated tTG back in April (tested b/c I have it), had a normal biopsy in May. Doc said stay on gluten, no damage, no celiac. Didn't like that advice, got a second opinion and he basically said the same but was way more willing to search for a diagnosis. Re-ran tTG (had been 3 mos since initial tTG), ran EMA, vitamin D and iron, CBC. She had been gluten free at home about 2-3 weeks prior to the tests though. Her tTG was 44 (<20 normal) so down from 78.20 likely because oflower gluten diet 2-3 weeks.

Her EMA was 1:40 with a normal range of < 1:10 dilution. GI said she is "mildly positive" on EMA- ? Don't ou either have endomysial antibodies or not???? And regardless of the value, having them is quite specific to celiac, yes? I don't understand the EMA values, can anyone clarify?

anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) are very specific to celiac. EMA in the presence of TtG screams "HELLOOOOO....TISSUE DAMAGE GOING ON...."

The doctors who dismissed you with instructions to continue on gluten are dolts.

Did you happen to get a copy of the biopsy report from the doctor? It would be interesting to know how many samples they took and what observations they made during the scope. It is awfully easy to miss damage, especially if it is in the early stages. Basically what the doctors have told you is to go home, let your daughter keep eating poison until she is seriously ill, THEN come back and let them treat her.

Not with my daughter, they wouldn't.

Your daughter's response (antibody reduction) to gluten-free eating says everything. She should NOT be eating gluten.

Sorry for being so pointed, I get so fed up with doctors! Especially the ones that seem to have gotten their degrees from Cracker Jack boxes.

MitziG Enthusiast

Couldn't agree more. Dolts. Morons. Ignoramus....;) your doctors don't have a clue about celiac. She definitely has it. Either she doesn't have significant damage yet or they missed it. Find a doc to dx her- may mean a celiac specialist.

nvsmom Community Regular

My doctor diagnosed me as celiac with a very positive ttg IgA of over 200 (normal is 0-20) and a positive EMA of 1:40, and no endoscopy. I'm 38 and I strongly suspect I've been celiac since early childhood so I've had a longer time than your daughter to get my ttg levels way up there... That's just my theory.

And yes, EMA is very specific to celiac. I think I've read that it's over 95% specific to celiac... I'm afraid I can't quote where I've read that but I think it was Dr. Green's book on celiac disease.

Anyways,I think my doctor would have diagnosed her as celiac. Best wishes to your daughter.

Mom-of-Two Contributor

Thank you! I was just trying to understand her value of 1:40, how that was in relation to the 1:10 dillution they measured. Her biopsy slides were reviewed a second time by a different pathology, with this new GI- they found the same normal results. They are as follows:

A. Esophageal biopsy, no diagnostic abnormality- Three fragments for testing.

B. Gastric biopsy, no diagnostic abnormality- one stomach fragment for testing.

C. Small bowel biopsy, no diagnostic abnormality- six small bowel samples for testing.

Results: The small bowel biopsy has long delicate villi and shows a normal number of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria. There are no increased intraepithelial lymphocytes.

I thought the first GI we saw was just a fluke, which is why we sought out the second opinion- at Cleveland Clinic, where I am seen for my celiac, the pediatric GI we took her to this time, has a specialist in celiac in chidlren, and it is also a research hospital so I felt more confident and was quite surprised that he did not diagnosis her soley on her labs and family history. He does support the gluten free diet, he just can't "diagnosis" her as such, in his words.

My own celiac dr, a PhD who specializes in celiac, said NONSENSE!!!!! Take her off gluten ASAP! So, I felt better talking to her than the GI my daughter saw! My celiac dr doesn't see or treat children though.

beachbirdie Contributor

Thank you! I was just trying to understand her value of 1:40, how that was in relation to the 1:10 dillution they measured. Her biopsy slides were reviewed a second time by a different pathology, with this new GI- they found the same normal results. They are as follows:

Ohhh...I see you wanted to understand the dilution thing.

Basically, what they are doing is repeatedly diluting the sample (doubling the dilution, halving the concentration) to the point they can no longer see the antibodies.

So, the more times they dilute it, the more antibodies there are (the higher the concentration).

The higher the second number, the more antibodies there are.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mom-of-Two Contributor

So she still had 4 times what the dilluted titer was? I was just curious because my EMA result didn't have a number value, just positive.

I was convinced when she came back Vitamin D deficient, because the girl 1) spends lot of time outdoors 2) gets adequate D in her vitamins and 3) eats very well, and also gets a vitamin D supplement year round except in the summer months when she spends so much time outdoors

So, to me, it is clear she is not absorbing the vitamin D- they only tested D and iron, in addition to a CBC, so if her pediatrician suggests it at her 8 year appt coming up in Oct, we will run a larger vitamin panel.

beachbirdie Contributor

So she still had 4 times what the dilluted titer was? I was just curious because my EMA result didn't have a number value, just positive.

I was convinced when she came back Vitamin D deficient, because the girl 1) spends lot of time outdoors 2) gets adequate D in her vitamins and 3) eats very well, and also gets a vitamin D supplement year round except in the summer months when she spends so much time outdoors

So, to me, it is clear she is not absorbing the vitamin D- they only tested D and iron, in addition to a CBC, so if her pediatrician suggests it at her 8 year appt coming up in Oct, we will run a larger vitamin panel.

LOL, at this level of detail I think you need Skylark! I understand the process vaguely, that's about it. Basically, as I understand it, the ratio refers to the number of dilutions, not the number of antibodies. So, the 1:40 is just saying there is one part patient serum in 39 parts of the diluting solution, making 40 parts in total. That is the last solution concentration at which they found antibodies. They usually start at 1 part serum to 9 parts diluting solution (giving the 1:10 ratio) and then do a series of dilutions until they don't see any more antibodies.

Does that help a little better?

These can be reported either as ratios, or as whole numbers, depending on the lab. Every lab is different, so if your daughter's test was done at a different lab than yours, the result will look different.

If it were me, I'd seriously have my daughter gluten free.

Mom-of-Two Contributor

Thanks for explaining :)

Starting school in a few days, just got her medical form updated and bag of safe snacks/treats ready for the classroom. Overwhelming but at least we are starting the school year off fresh.

I am really just still in the shock/denial process that she has celiac disease :( just so surprised as she has never had stomach symptoms, was an extremely happy baby/toddler and has never had any issues with foods. She has made it to 8 with barely a tummy ache!

No use in denial I suppose, you just hope so badly that your children won't be positive, I was only checking since I have it myself!

So begins our journey.

nora-n Rookie

celiac is genetic, and she got the genes from you.

Often nowadays doctors will rule in celiac when there is doubt, after a positive gene test.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,216
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    cboling
    Newest Member
    cboling
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Milarynn,  Welcome to the forum!   Many undiagnosed, untreated Celiac Disease patients have vitamin and mineral deficiencies.  Be sure to have your Vitamin D level checked.  Vitamin D helps prevent bone loss, including loss from the jaw and teeth.   Magnesium and calcium are both important to bone health as well.  Magnesium helps keep the calcium from leaving your bones.  Magnesium helps make life sustaining enzymes with Thiamine Vitamin B1.  Low Magnesium and/or low Thiamine results in muscle cramping.   Thiamine deficiency is found in Pre-diabetes and Diabetes.  Poor absorption of the eight water soluble B vitamins and Vitamin C are found in Celiac Disease.  Insufficient Vitamin C can cause poor oral health, resulting in poor gum health such as receding and bleeding gums.  Vitamin C is needed to fight bacteria that cause plaque which causes cavities.  Vitamin C helps rebuild tooth enamel.   I've had jaw muscle cramping, TMJ problems, tooth loss and gum problems.  Do talk to your dentist about having Celiac Disease.  Practice good oral hygiene.  I'm also Diabetic and take Benfotiamine (a form of Thiamine) that helps regulate blood glucose and heal the intestines. Do keep us posted on your test results and your progress!
    • trents
      Milaryrnn, your post is confusing. First, your celiac disease antibody testing is negative. By any chance had you already been on a gluten free diet before the blood draw for these tests was done? That would result in negative antibody testing even if you had celiac disease. Or, had you previously been diagnosed with celiac disease and had the antibody testing done to check for compliance with the gluten free diet? Second, DNA testing cannot be used to confirm celiac disease. 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. It takes both the genetic potential and some triggering biological stress event in order to develop active celiac disease. Otherwise, the genes remain inactive. High lipase levels would indicate some problem with your pancreas. 
    • More2Learn
      Thanks, yes, I've gone back and forth.  There is a lot of autoimmune disease in my family, so primarily I was thinking a real diagnosis might be helpful for other family members -- especially as I have two young biological nephews.  I feel like I am at a crossroads, where if I'm going to test now would be the time, since I've been in a less-than-perfect eating period.  I'm either going to just going to use what I've learned in these last few months to purposely never cheat again (obviously there is the accidental glutening situations) or test first, and then do that.  I don't need an official diagnosis so much that if I'm doing well I'm going to sabotage that by then starting to eat gluten again. I'm so glad you said this.  Even from what I've read so far, it makes sense to me that this is a misconception.  But growing up with all kinds of allergies, I can see how, as for the general population it's just easier for everyone to simplify it down to a type of "allergy," people would assume this.  It's just how most people look at allergies and diets and gluten avoidance has been painted as both.  I even see it in my journey to date, when I say I want a gluten free selection at a restaurant and I am asked "is it an allergy?" and it is so much easier just to say yes (even if the answer is actually well, no, it's autoimmune).  Because the "yes" answer is the "this is serious" answer.
    • Milarynn
      Hello. I recently had an endo/colonoscopy and my GI Dr found lymphocytes in my stomach and small intestine. My TTG Ab, IgA was <2 (normal), GLIADIN (DEAMINATED) IGA at 5 (negative), and IgA at 237 (normal). However, a Lipase test revealed my levels were through the roof at 201, 3x above normal. My GI doctor ordered a dna test to confirm Celiac Disease. An A1C test was also done and I am pre-diabetic. When I got home from work today, I started to feel sever cramping in my jaw muscles. I started to have jaw muscle cramps in the the last year. Not to mention, even with good oral hygiene, I have rapidly developed periodontal disease. I did have a small amount of gluten, thinking it wouldn’t harm much but I was sadly mistaken. DNA results should be back in 2 weeks. 
    • kopiq
      I also have food particles left on toiet paper when i wipe and my stool is light yellow not absorbing fats. I urinate about 15 times a day and have very sticky snot,dry throat.
×
×
  • Create New...