Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I'm The Only One :(


fisharefriendsnotfood

Recommended Posts

fisharefriendsnotfood Apprentice

There is NO ONE in my whole family that knows they have celiac disease. I found out it was a genetic disease a few weeks ago, and was like, then how do I have it? I suspect it's from my dad's side of the family, because my aunt has stomach problems but has never been tested for celiac disease. I really think she has it though.

And then, my uncle on my mom's side is "allergic to wheat". I don't think he's been formally tested to a wheat allergy, it just "bothers him". He's not even wheat-free though; we had my family over for a family member's birthday and he ate the white birthday cake, which is obviously not wheat-free.

But I still think it's from my dad's side.

BUT, neither of my parents have it I think, because they have NO symptoms of Celiac at all. I don't think they've been tested though; but still, they're both tall and at normal weight.

WHERE DID MY celiac disease come from???

Thanks,

Jackie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



skoki-mom Explorer

I got tested because my sister was diagnosed last winter. Like your parents, I don't have any symptoms, never have, maybe I never would have become symptomatic, who knows. Our parents have also tested negative, but they both have bowel "issues". In fact, I am the only member of the family that is normal in that department, go figure!!! What I have learned so far is that it seems to be a recessive gene, so both parents must carry it, but a recessive gene is needed from both of them for us to have celiac disease. I read an article that says family members should be tested for antibodies througout the course of their life because the celiac disease could become "active" at any time. I think a lot of family members avoid screening because they just really don't want to know. I admit I have had many a moment when I wish I'd never had that blood test, even though I know it was the "right" thing to do. Sometimes being responsible really sucks, lol. Chances are if your siblings (if you have any), aunts, uncles and cousins were tested, someone else would have it too.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Some people do not get symptoms with celiac so you can't tell with symptoms. You have to get a full celiac panel to detect it. Allergy tests will not pick it up because it is not an allergy. It is genetic but it could be traced back generations..your parents do not necessarily have to have it but they have the gene for it. If they have the gene then it can be activated at any time so they really should be tested every so often to make sure.

I can tell you now...throughout your families history...someone had it along the way...probably a few people...even if they did not know it.

jams Explorer

Am I understanding it right that BOTH, mother and father must have the gene? I think mine is from my dad's side. My mom was tested but was negative. I am not sure what they tested either. I am having detailed test results sent to me from my last test. They just said it was "normal". I am not sure what they all test for where we go to the doctor. We go to the same clinic just different doctors.

My dad will never get tested. He loves beer too much and hates the doctor. I have read a lot about celiacs, but this part has always been a little hazy for me.

Thanks to anyone that can help clear this up!!

skoki-mom Explorer

Try this link! I thought it did a good job of explaining the genetics behind celiac disease.

www.uchicagokidshospital.org/pdf/uch_007936.pdf

newo ikkin Rookie

I'm not sure where mine came from either only because no one in my family wants to get tested. My mom and 2 of my siblings got bloodwork done but that all come back negative. So unless some others in my family suck it up and get tested I won't know.

Guest nini

no one else in my family is willing to get tested... my dad is the only one who was willing to "try" the gluten-free diet and see if it helped him (it did)... I think both of my parents have it, and my sister, and there's and aunt I'm really sure has it, but NO ONE is willing to get tested. I wonder why this is...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



skoki-mom Explorer
no one else in my family is willing to get tested... my dad is the only one who was willing to "try" the gluten-free diet and see if it helped him (it did)...  I think both of my parents have it, and my sister, and there's and aunt I'm really sure has it, but NO ONE is willing to get tested. I wonder why this is...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Because they don't want to know, they don't want to go on the diet. I have often thought I wish I didn't get tested because I'm not *sick*, as in I don't have symptoms, but I do know it is better in the long run for me to know. But, that is why they won't get tested, they are scared it will come back positive.

bluelotus Contributor
Try this link!  I thought it did a good job of explaining the genetics behind celiac disease. 

www.uchicagokidshospital.org/pdf/uch_007936.pdf

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

thanks for the great pdf. others were talking about the inheritance of this disease a week or so ago and I tried to explain that most genes, and most diseases, are not inherited in the typical recessive fashion (very different from what they tell you in high school bio.) and that even having a gene for something doesn't mean you will get it. genes don't act/work in solice and instead work together with many others, which is why genetic counseloing is never exact (except for maybe blood type or color blindness).....and then you have to take the environment into account in addition to other genes. all of this together is why things like genetic disease and cancer are so difficult to predict. we have around 30,000 genes, imagine designing that algorithm to predict inheritance.....!!!

Guest gfinnebraska

I don't know where mine came from either. My brother doesn't want to "know" ~ he would never switch to a gluten-free diet. Neither one of my parents "seem" to have it. My other relatives all live in Sweden, so no way of knowing! I just pray that I don't pass it on to my sons. :(

tarnalberry Community Regular

Well, not only do you not need both parents to give you the gene, but having the gene doesn't mean you will definitely get celiac. It has to be triggered. Many more people carry one of the genes without developing celiac disease or gluten intolerance.

nettiebeads Apprentice

I'm the only one in my immediate family and don't know of any aunts, uncles, grands or cuz that have it. But it's probably from my mother's side (100% Swede and as stubborn as they come)

Guest gfinnebraska
(100% Swede and as stubborn as they come)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

LOL ~ Same here, Nettie! I'm 75% Swede and just about as stubborn (or so my family says...)

ponita Newbie

Since my dx, I found that I have celiac disease on both my mother and father's side. On my mother's side, my grandmother, aunt and 2 cousins have it, on my father's side it's 2 cousins. No one discussed it until I was dx'd which I think finally put a name to all the symptoms others were having.

Hey, look at this the bright side, I can go to family reunions with 'safe" foods!

Gotta laugh!

Interesting note: my mother's side of family is swedish, fathers side Czech.

Melissa

luvs2eat Collaborator

I'm the only one in my family... altho my brother or sister refuse to be tested. They have, I'm sure, the derm part of celiac and because they can take meds (for eczema, etc) they're not willing to give up their yummy breads.

My daughter was just diagnosed.

fisharefriendsnotfood Apprentice

Thanks everyone for all the great replies!

My sister had the blood test when she was really little, but it came back negative. I thought that meant she doesn't have it; she could have it even if it came back negative???

I asked my dad about it yesterday but he said maybe someone had it, like a great-grandparent or something.

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!

-Jackie

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Thanks everyone for all the great replies!

My sister had the blood test when she was really little, but it came back negative. I thought that meant she doesn't have it; she could have it even if it came back negative???

I asked my dad about it yesterday but he said maybe someone had it, like a great-grandparent or something.

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!

-Jackie

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

If someone has the gene then it can be triggered at any time in life. So just because you test negative younger does not mean you do not have it now- it just means at that point it was not triggered. If there is people in the family with it, everyone should be tested every 2-5 years(sooner if symptoms appear) to make sure it has not activated. Symptoms doesn't really matter with celiac though...they may have it and not even realize it...or maybe theirs just was not triggered.

Guest BellyTimber

Their symptoms are nerve, bone, skin, etc symptoms, even heart.

Just about every part of the body.

Also overweight.

If you include these there will be less people without symptoms of celiac disease and equivalent but the principle still applies, it just hasn't expressed itself in these ways yet.

If you put suitable words in the serahc faciliy you will come up with the list of 200 symptoms someone posted a few months ago

.

dogear Rookie
Because they don't want to know, they don't want to go on the diet.  I have often thought I wish I didn't get tested because I'm not *sick*, as in I don't have symptoms, but I do know it is better in the long run for me to know.  But, that is why they won't get tested, they are scared it will come back positive.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

People can be stubborn. Personally though, I'm glad enough not to have the medical risks associated with celiac. But I would RATHER DIE THAN NOT BE gluten-free. I would rather be tortued the same way people were at Abu Gharib than intentionally cheat on my diet.

If I ever ended up intentionally eating wheat, I would probably feel as bad about myself as a born again Christian would about going into prostitution six months before her wedding.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,980
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JoshuaHuson
    Newest Member
    JoshuaHuson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • WildFlower1
      The results of my blood tests after 4 weeks: *Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA —->   “<0.5 NEGATIVE” *Immunoglobulin IgA —-> “1.25” *Deamidated Gliadin peptide Ab IgG —-> “<0.5 NEGATIVE”    
    • WildFlower1
      Hi there, I have been scouring the forums, medical journals, celiac websites, speaking to my doctor and there seems to be a contradiction in the exact amount of time one must do the gluten challenge for a blood test. Let me please express my gratitude for taking your time to help! I will try and keep this short. In a nutshell, I am positive genetically for celiac. Previously for many years 10+ I have been on a strict gluten free diet. At a very young age, I had infertility, hair loss, low iron, stomach problems, neurological symptoms, continued low bone density etc. etc. all the symptoms that line up with celiac.  I could never get an “official diagnosis” because I was not eating gluten for years.   Recently, I had a bone density scan, and was shocked at the results. I am young and my low bone density is continuously lowering. This lead me  to seriously consider doing the celiac blood test to confirm if I actually have celiac. Years ago, I had an endoscopy and they did a biopsy saying it was negative for celiac - but I had been on a gluten free diet for years. Now, I asked my doctor if I can start the gluten challenge and get this over with. My doctor said two weeks then get the blood test. I have been having 2-3 pieces of bread daily. After four weeks of doing this, I went for the bloodwork - it came back negative for celiac. I am continuing to eat bread daily, it has now been over 6 weeks. I am not able to get an endoscopy. Please, from your experience how long really must I eat bread daily to ensure I do not get a false negative blood test for celiac? I have read up to 12 weeks. One doctor advised this is foolish to even do this gluten challenge as I am damaging my body. My other doctor said 2 weeks eat it, but it showed negative. But with my recent continuous lowering of bone density I personally need to rule celiac out.   Thank you VERY much for your help, I truly appreciate it!!
    • Soleihey
    • Scott Adams
      It's possible he's in the early stages of celiac disease, and it has been caught before villi damage. The blood test results so far do indicate possible celiac disease, as well as his strong family history of celiac disease. If his symptoms get better on a gluten-free diet this would be another strong indication. Personally I think it's definitely better to proceed on the safe side and go gluten-free, rather than to risk severe villi damage and all that comes with it.
    • Dora77
      For some context: I have type 1 diabetes (T1D) (since 11 years) and celiac disease(since 4 years) For about a year now, I’ve been experiencing permanent floating and undigested stools. I’ve had a pancreas elastase test done. The first result was extremely low at 44, but a second test came back at 236. My doctor said that since one result is normal, it rules out pancreatic insufficiency because, according to them, elastase levels would always stay low if that were the issue. However, could the 236 have been a false result? My doctor also thinks I don’t have pancreatic insufficiency because I’m able to gain weight. I also get hgh injections as my bone age is younger than my real age, this also contributes to weight gain, so I dont know if weight gain can rule out malabsorption. But maybe if I had real malabsorption I wouldnt gain any weight even with hgh? For celiac, I’m on a gluten-free diet, but there might b small cross-contamination from things like pepper labeled as “may contain gluten.” or sausages which dont have gluten ingredient but say may contain. My doctor said that small amounts like this wouldn’t harm me and even mentioned that an occasional small exposure to gluten may not do much damage (which seems questionable since I thought even tiny amounts could be harmful). She also said that when Im older (Im m17) I could try eating small amounts of gluten and do antibody blood tests to see if I can tolerate small amounts or not. For reference, I’m asymptomatic when it comes to celiac, so I have no idea if I’ve been “glutened” or not. My first concerning celiac blood test was semi high IgA, then 3 months later we did a check up and my IgA was high so it was confirmed celiac. Since than I’ve had celiac antibody tests done yearly to see how my diet is going, and they’ve been negative, but I’ve heard those aren’t always reliable. I’ve never had a follow-up endoscopy to confirm healing. I also always kept eating „may contain gluten“ food. (I live in Germany so I dont know if „may contain gluten“ is as risky as in the usa but I suppose both are as risky) These stool issues started around the same time I was doing excessive heavy lifting at the gym. Could stress or lifting have triggered this, or is that less likely since the symptoms persist even after I stopped lifting? Occasionally, I’ll feel very mild stomach discomfort, but it’s rare and not severe. My doctor (also a dietist) said floating, undigested stools could still be “normal,” but that doesn’t seem realistic to me. Could this be impacting my vitamin or protein absorption? I also did a fructose intolerance breath test and had a high baseline of 20 ppm, but it never increased—only decreased over time. I fasted for 12 hours and didn’t eat fructose beforehand, but my stomach didn’t feel completely empty during the test. Could this mean the test was inaccurate? For lactose intolerance, I did the breath test but only fasted 10 hours and had eaten lactose prior because I wasn’t aware of the proper diet restrictions. My results were: 14, 12, 15, 25, 35, 40, 40 ppm—which would be considered positive. But given that I didn’t fast long enough or follow the right diet, could this result be unreliable? Has anyone else dealt with similar symptoms? What ended up being the cause for you? And sorry for the long text!
×
×
  • Create New...