Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Results....what Do I Make Of This?


bobtom

Recommended Posts

bobtom Rookie

Little background. My son, 11 years old, complain of stomach aches off and on since about beginning of year. Went to pediatrician and she ordered deamidated gliadin peptide IGA result 67 (<20). Referred to GI doc. Ordered total IGA which came back 184 (64-246) and TTG which came back <1. Didn't tell me range for that but can't get much lower than 1 so I guess it doesn't matter. Anyway, they say it definitely is NOT celiac. That's great, but why is the Gliadin so high? I asked if he could be in the early stages and not show up on his TTG, and they dismissed that idea. Said the gliadin sometimes shows up in people with other underlying conditions but didn't go into what that could mean. I'm not sure where to go from here. Take it as negative and move on, or continue to persue. I just don't want to miss something and then down the road they say it's celiac which was just too early to show up, which seems to be a common thread I have been reading. Any thoughts??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mamaupupup Contributor

Hi there,

About to head to get some sleep, but a quick note: there are a LOT of false negatives for the TTG. In fact, I never had a positive TTG (out of three times I tested) but I did do the endoscopy and clearly have damage to my sm intestine = a difinitive diagnosis for Celiac. Also, one of my daughters tested negative 2 out of 3 of her TTG tests (our other daughter was a very clear positive TTG). A positive TTG is a very accurate indicator of Celiac.

- Yes, I believe it's possible he could be in the beginning stages of Celiac. If this is the case, you might consider testing him annually to see if the TTG is triggered sometime in the not too distant future.

- I believe I had a low TTG because I had (over 40+ years) developed enough food aversions to effectively take myself off gluten inadvertantly and unknowingly (I avoided pasta, beer, pizza...). You may consider (heavily) gluten loading him for 3+ to 6 months and see if his TTG changes (this is how we triggered one daughter's TTG to a positive result).

All this said, I believe there is a lot to subjectively consider in looking at Celiac disease. Here is the list of things we considered as inputs for diagnosing our kids (and then me):

- Bloodwork (TTG, etc)

- Genetic testing

- Endoscopy

- Symptoms while eating gluten

- Easing of symptoms once off gluten (don't do this until you're done testing)

- Family history of Celiac, GI cancers, other related disorders etc.

Celiac can be easily definitive (in the case of one daughter with positive TTG, positive genetics, positive endoscopy, symptomatic, better off gluten) or more of an art (another daughter with eventual positive TTG, positive genetics, inconclusive endoscopy, symptomatic, better off gluten).

Hope this helps!

bobtom Rookie

Hi there,

About to head to get some sleep, but a quick note: there are a LOT of false negatives for the TTG. In fact, I never had a positive TTG (out of three times I tested) but I did do the endoscopy and clearly have damage to my sm intestine = a difinitive diagnosis for Celiac. Also, one of my daughters tested negative 2 out of 3 of her TTG tests (our other daughter was a very clear positive TTG). A positive TTG is a very accurate indicator of Celiac.

- Yes, I believe it's possible he could be in the beginning stages of Celiac. If this is the case, you might consider testing him annually to see if the TTG is triggered sometime in the not too distant future.

- I believe I had a low TTG because I had (over 40+ years) developed enough food aversions to effectively take myself off gluten inadvertantly and unknowingly (I avoided pasta, beer, pizza...). You may consider (heavily) gluten loading him for 3+ to 6 months and see if his TTG changes (this is how we triggered one daughter's TTG to a positive result).

All this said, I believe there is a lot to subjectively consider in looking at Celiac disease. Here is the list of things we considered as inputs for diagnosing our kids (and then me):

- Bloodwork (TTG, etc)

- Genetic testing

- Endoscopy

- Symptoms while eating gluten

- Easing of symptoms once off gluten (don't do this until you're done testing)

- Family history of Celiac, GI cancers, other related disorders etc.

Celiac can be easily definitive (in the case of one daughter with positive TTG, positive genetics, positive endoscopy, symptomatic, better off gluten) or more of an art (another daughter with eventual positive TTG, positive genetics, inconclusive endoscopy, symptomatic, better off gluten).

Hope this helps!

Thanks so much for the information. I am going to talk to the GI doc at more length about early stage celiac when we see him in November. I just think something must be going on if his gliadin IGA is high. Thanks again!!

MitziG Enthusiast

Your doctors are not up to speed, clearly. Gliadin tests are specific for GLIADIN. Your son is making antibodies to gluten. He has celiac.

Ttg tests are frequently negative. Even ONE positive test out of the whole panel warrants follow up. Since they aren't going to dx him based on MY opinion (go figure) request a biopsy be done. I would also ask for an EMA blood test while you are at it. If the biopsy happens to be negative (which is still likely, especially in early stages) two positive bloods may be harder for them to deny.

Darn210 Enthusiast

Little background. My son, 11 years old, complain of stomach aches off and on since about beginning of year. Went to pediatrician and she ordered deamidated gliadin peptide IGA result 67 (<20). Referred to GI doc. Ordered total IGA which came back 184 (64-246) and TTG which came back <1. Didn't tell me range for that but can't get much lower than 1 so I guess it doesn't matter. Anyway, they say it definitely is NOT celiac. That's great, but why is the Gliadin so high? I asked if he could be in the early stages and not show up on his TTG, and they dismissed that idea. Said the gliadin sometimes shows up in people with other underlying conditions but didn't go into what that could mean. I'm not sure where to go from here. Take it as negative and move on, or continue to persue. I just don't want to miss something and then down the road they say it's celiac which was just too early to show up, which seems to be a common thread I have been reading. Any thoughts??

My daughter was diagnosed before the newer deamidated tests were available. I'm not positive that I totally have my facts right so if I'm wrong, hopefully someone will come along and correct me. As it is, maybe it will give you enough info to do a little online research.

In the "old" tests (I'm only talking about five years ago), a high IgA didn't necessarily mean Celiac (although it could) . . . it did imply inflammation or "something" going on "somewhere". GI's did the tTG and EMA testing which was more indicative. In the last few years, they have come out with the deamidated version which is much more specific to Celiac than the old IgA testing. It looks to me that your pediatrician is more up to speed with current testing (ordering the deamidated test) than the GI...??? You might want to bounce a few questions off of the pediatrician and I would definitely research the deamidated form of testing to ask about during your next appointment with the GI.

My daughter's GI was open to using the response of a trial diet to help diagnose . . . not all GI's are . . . but it doesn't hurt to ask.

You can always try the diet on your own after completing any testing. Your son does need to be consuming gluten in order for the testing to have a chance at being accurate. I do recommend trying to get an official diagnosis as it is helpful in getting accommodations in the school environment.

frieze Community Regular

The performance of the peptide AGA assay was excellent, showing a specificity and sensitivity of 90% and 92% for IgA, and 98% and 75% for IgG, respectively.

The above info is from "clinic immulogy" 2007. Either your doc is behind, or way ahead and we havent seen the info yet. I am voting for the former. The ped should have ordered the the IgG version, which has even greater specificity, but lesser sensitivity.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,728
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patti Kolb
    Newest Member
    Patti Kolb
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Marie70
      Wow!! Scott, Trent and Christiana thank you so much for your fast replies!! The information you have shared with me has helped me tremendously.   Thank you for all the articles.  I appreciate you all so much!! I’ll keep you posted in this post.  I will encourage her to get tested.  I feel a little better!
    • DayaInTheSun
      It was gradual, just not being able to catch my breathe like I always had to take a deep breathe even taking a few steps I would be winded.
    • cristiana
      Hi Marie Welcome to the forum. I am so sorry your daughter is pointing the finger at you like this.   I am afraid children of any age can be very cruel to their parents - I certainly look back at some of the things I said to my mother and father in the past, and wish I could unsay them.  Sometimes people just need a safe place to vent, and unfortunately having a go at one's parents is the all too easy option.  If she is anything like me, she will regret what she says one day.  (Oh... if only I had the chance rewind the clock!) I just wanted to add one more thing to Trent's and Scott's excellent posts and that is regarding diet:  I have to say, not one person  (my nutritionist, my gastroenterologist or GP) has EVER suggested that a poor diet was the cause of my coeliac disease.    In all the various clinics I have attended these past nearly 12 years no-one has ever asked if I was brought up on processed food, or questioned if I eat 5 fruit and veg a day.  Sure, unfortunately I am only too well aware that I could do a lot better with my diet and it's a constant challenge for me not to give into what I like (unfortunately I've always had a sweet tooth).   But I know some super healthy 10 fruit and veg a day types who still got coeliac disease, and equally, a lot of people who eat all the wrong stuff and they still have cast iron stomachs. Do encourage her to get checked though - it may be that she hasn't got coeliac disease at all. Come back to us if you need any more support through the process. Cristiana
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Marie70! The first thing to know is that celiac disease has a genetic base. The two main genes that have been identified as providing the potential to develop celiac disease are HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. About 40% of  the general population carries one or both of these genes. However, only about 1% of the general population ever develops celiac disease. So, we know that in addition to possessing the genetic potential to develop celiac disease, there has to be some triggering environmental or medical "stress" factor (or factors) that switches the gene or genes on such that they are awakened from their latent condition and become active. What may be the triggering factor (or factors) is the subject of much debate. Here is an article that discusses this subject: Second, what will your daughter have to say if her testing for celiac disease is negative? She may have to add crow to her diet. Third, and this is what I really want to focus on because my wife and I are dealing with something similar in our relationship with our own adult daughter: the real problem is not whatever shortcomings you, as the family cook, may have had when providing meals, the real problem is with your daughter's heart/soul/attitude. If it turns out to be true that she has celiac disease, it is likely she would have developed the condition sooner or later even if her diet had been healthier while growing up. She is angry about the prospect of having to deal with the dietary and social limitations that having celiac disease would impose upon her. She doesn't want to face up to the fact that this may be a new reality that will dramatically changer her life and she is looking for someone or something to blame. And she has conveniently turned her wrath on you rather than saying to herself, "Okay, this is what it is. Now what can I do to make adjustments in order to with it the best way I can?"  When faced with a life-changing reality, people will either accept it for what it is, make adjustments and move on or they will become angry and look for something or someone to blame and get stuck. For now, at least, your daughter has chosen the latter option. Don't let her problem destroy both of you.
    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like you’re carrying a lot of guilt, but please know that you didn’t cause your daughter’s potential celiac disease or your son’s Crohn’s. These conditions have strong genetic components, and while diet can influence symptoms, it does not cause autoimmune diseases. You did the best you could with the knowledge you had at the time, and no parent is perfect. Your daughter’s frustration is understandable, but it’s likely coming from a place of fear and uncertainty rather than true blame. Let her get tested, and if she does have celiac disease, you can support her moving forward. Instead of focusing on guilt, try shifting the conversation toward healing and learning together. You’re not alone, and you don’t deserve to carry this weight on your own. This article might be helpful. She needs to be screened for celiac disease before she can be sure that she has it. Another approach not discussed in the article is a genetic test for celiac disease, which she could do without eating gluten.      
×
×
  • Create New...