Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

2 Months Gf And Going For A Biopsy


Guest dlf1021

Recommended Posts

Guest dlf1021

I've been on the diet since late January and will be going for a biopsy next Friday (April 2). My GI told me that two months won't have any effect on the villi and if I do in fact have Celiac, there will still be evidence of it in my intestines. He made no mention of resuming a gluten diet until after the test is performed, but I'm still wondering it it would be a good idea? I just want to make sure that there's enough evidence if it is in fact Celiac.

Any advice?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gf4life Enthusiast

I think your doctor has it backwards, so don't be surprised if your biopsy is negative. You should have been on gluten for the past two months preparing for the biopsy. Even a few days of gluten free can mess up a biopsy. Certainly your intestines could have healed a significant amount in the last two months. Our bodies are amazingly good at reparing damage quickly. The biopsy may not show enough damage to be used to diagnose Celiac.

God bless,

Mariann

Guest dlf1021

mariann,

that's what i was afraid of. he assured me that nothing would have healed "that quickly" but considering his attitude toward me and his general lack of knowledge of the disease, it wouldn't surprise me if he messed up. this whole thing is turning into drama...i feel like i'm living in some soap opera :D

warpspeed Newbie

Wow! I'm going through the exact same thing. I've been gluten-free for 2 months and am having a biopsy next Tuesday. I mentioned that it will probably be negative because of the diet and the GI doc wasn't concerned at all. He says he thinks it'll show other food intolerances. I haven't heard that before, have you? Because the gluten-free diet didn't help, he thinks I may be intolerant of many foods. I have avoided alcohol, dairy and soy also. My blood test was positive for celiac. What do you think?

warpspeed

Dwight Senne Rookie

My thinking is it would depend on your symptoms. If you showed signs of malabsorbtion (greasy, floating stools, lowered cholesterol, etc) prior to going gluten-free, this would indicate that there could have been significant villous atrophy. I doubt that would all be healed up in two months! However, if there were no signs of malabsorbtion, the endoscopic biopsy becomes more of an iffy proposal.

Your doctor may also be basing this on how long you have been symptomatic. If you have had symptoms of Celiac for many years, he may be assuming there is sufficient villous atrophy to still be present.

My only other concern would be that you may not show the doudenitis that is often associated with active Celiac. It may be there, I'm not sure - I'm not a doc. My guess is, that it would not, however.

Guest dlf1021

dewiehughie,

looking back, i guess i've had symptoms for almost 10 years. i'm really hoping that they can get an accurate read. even if the test comes back negative, there's always going to be that 'what if' factor there.

my doc didn't seem convinced that i had any symptoms of celiac at all. i don't know where he got his information from because as far as i know, i have all but DH and anemia. he also told me that celiac patients don't suffer from abdominal pain. ha.

warpspeed-

good luck with your biopsy. i hope everything turns out alright and you find the answers you are looking for!

wildones Apprentice

Why are either of you doing biopsies with doctors who don't know what they are talking about ???? If you have a positive blood test, why are you even doing a biopsy ?? A biopsy does not need to be done, as far as I know, if you already have confirmation through a blood test. I personally would not trust a doctor who does not realize that 2 months gluten free is enough to see an improvement in the damage (if any) to your villi. If I were you, I would at least ask the GI doctors you are seeing, exactly why they are doing what they are doing and how much experience they have in diagnosing and treating celiac disease.

I have a tremendous amount of respect for many doctors my kids and I have seen over the years. The ones who deserve respect are the ones who will readily admit when they really don't have an answer, but are willing either to refer you on or do some reasearch for you. I do not respect the doctors, at all, who will refuse to take a patient's complaints seriously and are dismissive of things, out of ignorance. Doctors are just like everyone else, some are very good and some are not. Doctors, just like every other professional have to earn our respect in order to retain us as patients.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



danesmom Newbie

I'm new at this (celiac disease and message boards). my 12 month old son is having his biopsy done monday. We just found out about celiac disease yesterday. The dr insisted I give him Gluten. I cry every time I feed him knowing I'm harming him. Immediately it comes right back out. I fought with the drs not to give him gluten, besides its only three days. But they insisted he MUST stay on a gluten diet to get accurate results.

I hope things work out for you.

gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Danesmom,

Welcome to the board. I am sorry to hear about your son being sick, but be thankful that your doctors seems to know what they are doing. You will be able to help your son get healthy and stay healthy! I know it is hard to keep giving him gluten knowing that it is making him sick, but it is only until Monday. Many of us have to wait months for a biopsy.

I will be keeping all of you in my prayers. I hope your biopsies show whatever they need to to be accurately diagnosed.

God bless,

Mariann :)

Guest gillian502

I hope all who have this problem get a chance to talk with their doctor, wait on having those biopsies, and go back on gluten for a while until you can then have the biopsy you need and get a proper result. It's so sad how little doctors know about our disease. Mine told me to go on and off the diet and just deal with the diarrhea, no big deal, and he said this wasn't a diet I had to remain on for life. Sometimes I am stunned by the ignorance of others. Thanks God I knew more than my doctor on this subject, can you imagine if I didn't? I would've gone back to gluten and then maybe developed a secondary autoimmune disease or lymphoma that could've killed me. I just will never understand why it is that if these people don't know the answer to something, they don't go research it and find out, rather than giving advice that could risk our lives. If I had gotten this disease before the advent of the internet I wouldn't know nearly as much and I shudder to think where I might be! If you think you can stand the gluten, please go back to it and wait for the biopsy...and yes, DO have the biopsy...the medical community will never consider you a Celiac until you do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      When you say a GI doc did an IGA five years ago and it was negative, which IGA measure do you speak of. There are several possibilities. Do you refer to the tTG-IGA? Have you had a total IGA test done? It isn't a test for celiac per se but can establish whether or not you are IGA deficient. If you are IGA deficient, it will drive individual IGA test scores down and can result in false positives. The tTG-IGA should always be accompanied by a total IGA test. When people are IGA deficient and actually do have celiac disease we often see it detected by the IGG tests. The same can be said if they have been skimping on gluten previous to the blood draw and, IMO, negatives in the IGA test spectrum with positives in the IGG spectrum can also point to NCGS or NCGS transitioning to celiac.
    • Scott Adams
      This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate. I agree that if your biopsy ends up negative, that you still may need to be gluten-free, as you could be in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity area. Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. Be sure to eat lots of gluten daily until your endoscopy, otherwise you could get false negative results.    
    • hmkr
      I had several celiac blood tests done at a rheumatologist last month. I've had many possible symptoms over the last 23 years, including GERD/LPR, constipation, and recently joint stiffness and pain in my hands. It all started during my first pregnancy. 1/160 ANA back then as well as now with no autoimmune diagnosis. I've had undiagnosed high fevers, swollen lymphs nodes, ear pain, miscarriages, to name just a few more symptoms. I can't help but be upset at the many doctors I've been to that have missed this. A GI doctor only did the IgA 5 years ago, which was negative then too, and didn't do a biopsy as a result during an endoscopy shortly after. Deaminated Gliadin IgG Antibody test was 90, >15 being abnormal.   Deaminated Gliadin IgA Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibody, negative I'm scheduled for a biopsy at the end of January. The new GI doctor thinks if not celiac, I will still need to be gluten free the rest of my life due to the antibodies my body is producing. I feel like it's got to be celiac. I've been consuming gluten every day to prepare for this test. It can't come soon enough.  Thoughts on that IgG being positive and the others negative? I haven't gotten a clear explanation for that yet. Thanks in advance for any input!! 
    • Kiwifruit
      That’s good to know. Might be time to head back to my gastrointestinal doctor then.
    • trents
      Yeah, you may not have been consuming enough gluten to result in valid testing.
×
×
  • Create New...