Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Cheating When On A Gluten Free Diet


jwblue

Recommended Posts

jwblue Apprentice

Is cheating ever allowed when on a gluten-free diet? I can't imagine eating something with gluten one time a month is would

do harm to a person with Celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Bad idea. Each time you ingest gluten, you restart the autoimmune reaction that damages your body. It can take a few weeks for the system to recover. Cheating once a month would render the other gluten-free days of the month pointless.

This isn't like diabetes, where the effect of some sugar is gone from the system in 24 hours. The adverse effects of gluten last at least a couple of weeks.

Darn210 Enthusiast

It depends on why you are eating gluten free . . . If it's because someone has Celiac disease, then no, no cheating. It will do damage and most people have painful reactions.

If it's because someone is following the fad diet thinking they're going to lose weight, then they can do whatever they want.

kareng Grand Master

No cheating. Hear it from medical experts:

Open Original Shared Link

"The gluten-free diet is a lifetime requirement. Eating any gluten, no matter how small an amount, can damage the intestine. This is true for anyone with the disease, including people who do not have noticeable symptoms"

LauraB0927 Apprentice

Do you have Celiac? Gluten intolerance or allergy? I'd never dream of purposely cheating on my gluten free diet. Even a small amount now makes me feel so terrible that I couldnt imagine what I'd feel like if I had eaten a whole slice of bread. Also, if you do have Celiac (the autoimmune response) and you keep "cheating," then you run the risk of developing other serious health problems. Is pasta, cookies, or bread every once in a while worth developing more health problems? If you have a craving for something there's usually a pretty good gluten free substitute that will calm your cravings without making you sick - you just may have to hunt around for it.

AandGsmomma Apprentice

No, cheating is not ok if your in the diet for Celiac. I get so sick from cross contamination I wouldnt dare a full on cheat.

Adalaide Mentor

The repurcussions of a "simple" CC last well over a month for me. There is no amount of money in the world that would get me to eat gluten on purpose. You'll come around and see that also. Even if you don't get horribly ill like many of us do, as already stated you increase your chances of so many complications that really, it isn't worth it. How many AI diseases do you really want before you regret not just sticking to the gluten free diet like you should have in the first place? I can tell you from someone more than 30 years undiagnosed that once you are eliminating a buttload of other things from your diet for a host of other AI diseases that can be treated by diet, you'll be counting your lucky stars that gluten is the least of your concerns.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Takala Enthusiast

The longer you are on a gluten free diet, the more intense the reactions to cross contamination can be, so there is little motivation to "cheat" at all. Plus, after a short while, most people adapt to the tastes of their new, healthier diet, and "regular" food doesn't seem that appealing, and the gluten isn't missed. So it is just the social aspect that has to be dealt with. It is easy for some of us to make this trade - off of eating our own food, in return for being able to be a lot more active. Plus, we can cook for other people. With the holidays coming up, cooking for ourselves handles the conundrum of what to do with the relatives who won't cooperate, or who don't get the entire cross - contamination issue.

A few doctors seem to have said it is okay to cheat once in a while.... :ph34r: uh, either they are misinformed, or they are using that sort of age old trick of letting someone make their own decisions so as to regain a feeling of having some control over the process, if they mess up, (even accidentally, by cross contamination) they can then get "back on the wagon" more quickly if they aren't berating themselves for failing and thinking it is impossible to stick to the diet.

SMDBill Apprentice

Is cheating ever allowed when on a gluten-free diet? I can't imagine eating something with gluten one time a month is would

do harm to a person with Celiac.

That sentence about not imagining a little bit once a month would harm someone with celiac is a common misconception, particularly by those who do not have it or do not have someone close in their lives with it. If you have celiac, even if you suffer no physical pain from ingestion of gluten your body goes through a lot of damage to your intestinal villi. To intentionally cause that damage once a month is almost inviting the future problems that long term untreated celiac can bring. Some research into celiac can provide answers regarding cancers and other pretty bad outcomes, and may give you some insight into what a little gluten can cause in the long term. For many even a crumb can wreak havoc on the system and require weeks, months or even years to repair. To ingest that crumb (or bites/meals) monthly is not reasonable in any way and will have significant long term health repurcussions.
luvs2eat Collaborator

Never, ever, EVER... I've become so sensitive after 10 years and the accidental glutening I experienced a few months ago made me so danged sick... I'll never, EVER cheat.

Pegleg84 Collaborator

I think we've said it all: Short answer: Definitely Not!

For Celiacs and the Gluten Sensitive, even trace amounts of gluten can cause a reaction and do damage to our intestines. The reality is that unless you do all of your own cooking (with completely gluten-free ingredients), are extremely dilligent when eating out at either a restaurant or someone's home, then you will likely accidentally eat gluten at some point. But even getting glutened from cross contamination once a month is enough to cause problems for a few days at least. If it happens more than that, or if you eat a significant amount at once, you compound the problem.

"Cheating" - deliberately eating something that you know is not gluten free - is not a good idea.

Also, the reactions from gluten don't show up immediately in everyone. For some, it might take several days before you realise something is wrong. Even if you don't feel horrible, it doesn't mean you aren't recovering from the damage.

For example: a couple years ago, my mom, my sister and I (all Celiac) were eating the same bread from the freezer, for about a week over xmas. We all started feeling run down, bit bloaty, grumpy, nothing serious so figured it was from all the other things we were eating. Not until the day before I went home did I look closely at the bread bag and thought, wait, I didn't know they made gluten-free bread. Looked at the ingredients, and there it was: spelt. "Um, Mom! Did you know you've been poisoning us for a week?" She'd picked up the wrong bag at the store because it looked like the gluten-free one she usually gets. Lesson of the day: ALWAYS read the labels, even when it's in your Celiac mother's freezer... I never got really sick, and I'm not sure how long it took to recover, but was run down for weeks. No fun.

So, we're all going to make mistakes and get glutened accidentally, which is bad enough as it is. Cheating just isn't worth it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.