Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-Free 4 Yrs, Contradictory Test Results


rehh05

Recommended Posts

rehh05 Apprentice

Hi, I am new here, but thought you all might have some insight.

My great grandfather died of Sprue. I have 2 cousins who react to gluten. I have been having problems for years and 4 yrs ago a friend suggested removing gluten from my diet. I felt better, and have become quite vigilant about remaining gluten free and mostly dairy and soy free.

I was dxed with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (thyroidectomy), gall bladder quit (and was removed), IBS (was perscribed Librax), GERD (told to take Nexium), migraines (prescribed Zomig), arthritis (told to take ibuprofen), chronic sinus infections (given claritin)... early menopause (was given estrogen)... and have been trying to keep positive.... sooo... last year I changed to a new primary care physician, and he has been working his way through my body systems... sending me to all kinds of specialists. Most recently, I have been to a GI doctor... had a colonoscopy and endoscopy and the blood test that checks for gluten antibodies.

I asked the GI doctor if me being gluten free for a few years would affect the blood test... he said "No, almost no one is truly gluten free unless they are working closely with a nutrionist" so, hey, I didn't worry.

Test results? Probably not IBS... was told to wean off the Librax... he found very inflamed innards... pathology showed no crohn's diease, not colitis... but DID show partial villous atrophy. Blood test was negative... soooo... he had me have more blood taken to do the test to check for the chromosomal markers for celiac disease. hmmmmm... said not having the marker(s) would rule out celiac.

Test results may come back next week... the local hospital was not sure how to run the test, so it was to be sent to Mayo's I think.

I am unsure about all this. I DO feel better without gluten and dairy... and have always suspected corn to be an irritant... could the first blood test for the anitbodies have been a false negative? He seemed surprised to find the villous atrophy after the negative blood test.

Sigh.

Any insight would sure be appreciated!

Thanks ever so much!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tom Contributor

...

I asked the GI doctor if me being gluten free for a few years would affect the blood test... he said "No, almost no one is truly gluten free unless they are working closely with a nutrionist" ...

...

AAAAARGH! That's SO ridiculous he must have almost no experience w/ celiac patients. The antibody tests need the gluten.

(He might really think that 'in theory' the antibody tests are affected, but that no one's gluten-free so it doesn't matter? Either way a horrible point of view for a practicing GI.

"Unless working closely w/ a nutritionist" makes him sound like he thinks all foods are a mystery. Most ingredients are gluten-free - it can be a shock at 1st to have to pay attn to it all, but 100% gluten-free is not at all impossible.

... ... could the first blood test for the anitbodies have been a false negative?

It's not even that imho. An antibody test is invalid when done after that long gluten-free. An actual false neg requires a valid test.

tom Contributor

Also, it's a little goofy for him to be turning to the murky world of celiac genetics when you have villous atrophy AND a positive response to gluten-free.

Imho, every good GI would dx you on these, unless they have some other explanation for the villous atrophy.

Just shaking my head at that Dr's failed attempt at the blood test & warped view of the gluten-free diet.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

First off your GI is pretty ignorant about celiac. The fact you still have villi that are impacted may mean that you have not been as gluten free as you thought you were being. If you are sharing things like toasters, butter, nut butters, condiments, a shared colander, baking with gluten flours for others, eating in restaurants that don't have gluten-free menus etc you may still be getting enough gluten to keep the villi damage going.

Don't rely on the gene tests to rule out celiac as there are more than the two genes that most doctors look for associated with celiac. There are also some rare conditions that can also cause villi damage so do make sure your doctor rules those out. The fact that you improved a great deal gluten free is good and an indication that you do need the diet. You continued issues could be a result of cross contamination. Do make sure you also check all your medications, both OTC and script for gluten and read as much here as you can to learn what you need to do to keep yourself safe. Ask any more questions needed.

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

Ask for a SIBO test. It's a bacterial overgrowth that can damage villi. It can mimick Celiac. As far as the blood tests..it's rediculous to say that you are probably still eating gluten because you can't avoid it.

Also..be aware that most Dr.s agree that you have to have DQ2 or DQ8 to be Celiac. They dismiss anything that doesn't fit as not Celiac. I'm one who has DQ2.2..and had total villous flattening when DXed. Two different GIs did scopes and the biopsies said Celiac. Then they did the gene test and said they weren't so sure. It's ridiculous!

Get the SIBO test to see if it could be the cause of the villi blunting. AND..I'm banging the drum now for no GMOs. Corn, soy, canola, cottonseed, sugar beets, papaya, and zucchini and summer squash are all suspect. They have been genetically modified to produce insecticide which doesn't break down and can be released into our systems.

rehh05 Apprentice

Thanks for the comments :) I had not previously heard of SIBO... that is a good idea... also, I am reading all I can to learn more so when I go in again I can ask better questions. I knew you folks would help :)

  • 2 weeks later...
rehh05 Apprentice

got my test results back today. I have the DQ8 marker... so can't rule out celiac... he didn't really say I have celiac disease, but wants me to go see a registered dietician to follow a gluten free diet... I explained again that I have been gluten free for 4 years and have been very scrupulous (as much as I can be) for 2 years... he told me to humor him, to see the dietician and then come see him in a few weeks. He said if the dietician agrees that I am doing what I need to do, that is great, but I don't think he realizes that I have been sooooo careful. I feel as though my problems have just been handed off to someone else. ah well... at least I am now officially supposed to be gluten free and can tell my family as much :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



guest134 Apprentice

Going against what others are saying I think you have a good GI, he is not jumping to the conclusion of celiacs until all else is ruled out and getting you properly diagnosed and treated with a nutritionist shows that he cares. Be happy you have someone who is very thorough and is not just handing you a celiac pamphlet and saying get the hell out. At least after all this you can be assured of whatever it is you have.

This is an interesting article on a rare case:

Open Original Shared Link

tom Contributor

Going against what others are saying I think you have a good GI,

...

Are we reading the same story? The Dr who said the blood/antibodies test will work fine despite 4 yrs gluten-free?

That's an ignorant Dr.

guest134 Apprentice

Are we reading the same story? The Dr who said the blood/antibodies test will work fine despite 4 yrs gluten-free?

That's an ignorant Dr.

I was looking at the whole picture and not every word that came out of his mouth. My only direction is that you can have more than one issue going on at the same time and at least this doctor is taking his time to look into everything.

Unfortunately not everything that comes out of a doctors mouth is always accurate, but this one seems to at least be trying to find the cause.

rehh05 Apprentice

interesting abstract, thanks! Fortunately, they did not find any evidence of crohn's in the pathology report.

it is interesting to me that his first impressions, based on what he saw during the endoscopy and colonoscopy changed dramatically when my pathology report showed villous atrophy. I am glad that that at least now I can say that a doctor has told me I should follow a gluten-free diet... and he does want to make sure I am doing it well and completely... and he does want to see me in a few weeks after I have had time with the dietician... it just frustrated me a little to feel like I was being pushed off onto the dietician and that he really didn't believe that I have been as careful as I think I am being... and maybe he is right... maybe I am being exposed somehow... I do have the damage in there. I just hope we can figure out how to fix it so everything can heal. I worry about not absorbing vitamins and minerals and medicines properly.

But I kinda want to smack him in the head with the blood report I just picked up from his office which says in big all cap pletters that the results of the antigen test would be affected by previous non-gluten diet.

ah well... next hoop... I will jump... I just want to figure it all out. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,224
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mary Boyle
    Newest Member
    Mary Boyle
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yes, I have concerns about the calcium supplementation as well. Sounds like a good idea on the surface if you are trying to address bone density issues but when overdone it can have the opposite effect. Calcium supplementation increases gut PH (i.e., lowers gut acidity) which can interfere with vitamin and mineral (including calcium itself) absorption. Often, bone demineralization is not due to lack of calcium intake but to low gut acidity. This is why you will often see calcium supplement products paired with vitamin C (ascorbic acid). Drinking OJ or tomato juice along with the calcium supplement can help with this as they are acidic juices. Calcium supplementation can also contribute to plaque arterial buildup I believe. I think it might be best to focus on rich natural sources of calcium.
    • Wheatwacked
      In that case if you answer "no" does that mean the chef doesn't have to be as diligent?  If you ask for "pork free" do they ask if it is an allergy too? How's this for an answer: "I get violently sick if I eat wheat, barley or rye"?
    • Wheatwacked
      I order my vitamins from Pipingrock.com. They also make Cream of Rice.  Clearly marked gluten free. Right next to the Cream of Wheat. Stoneyfield Whole Milk Yogurt will help repoputate your gut bacteria.  It has lactase so is ok for lactose intolerance. 6 ounces has 210 mg calcium. For magnesium I get the 10 ounce bottle of liquid Magnesium Citrate at the supermarket or drugstore ($3).  One or two ounces of it  in a glass of water.  Add ice and sugar if you like.  I like the Cherry or Grape best. Instead try: Cream of Rice, Cheese and Good Thins (rice crackers), scrambled eggs and gluten free toast. Do you need Calcium supplement?  Calcium from supplements can cause hypercalcemia, a condition that can lead to serious health complications.  Vitamin D increases calcium absorption.  Monitor 25)(OH)D vitamin D plasma and  parathyroid hormone (PTH).    
    • trents
      The forms that vitamin and mineral supplements come in can be important. Bioavailability (i.e., how well they are absorbed) is often sacrificed for the sake of cost and shelf life. The vitamin or mineral you are targeting is always chemically combined with other elements to make them into a dispensable form (such as a powder, liquid or a pill) and to give them some chemical stability for shelf life.
    • llisa
      Thank you so much! I will look for that.
×
×
  • Create New...