Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fructose Intolerances -- What Does The Medical Literature Say?


Chaff

Recommended Posts

Chaff Explorer

Kareng brought up a good point on a different post -- what exactly does the medical literature say about problems eating fructose for people diagnosed with celiac? Some of us have it, but most don't. Is it a leaky gut thing? Is it a different genetic condition? Is there even a third factor that I can't think of right now that might be causing it?

The question spurred me on to better PubMed keyword searching. I think I ID'd some of the key stuff. It's sparse, though, and a lot of it offers no evidence, but just states it as current medical doctrine. Perhaps I can't find better stuff because I don't have a PubMed subscription and lack basic literacy in reading medical studies? I knew I should have taken BioChem in college, but noooo, I wanted to learn Italian.

Anyway, if anyone thinks they may have a severe issue with fructose, please PM me and I can talk with you offline about the fructose stuff, which has a good body of research behind it and a nice group of folks online who can answer questions on it. There's dietary (DFI or fructose malabsorption) and HFI (the scary one that's genetic and causes liver damage). They're basically analgamous to gluten intolerance vs celiac -- both suck but one's proven to be genetic and is more restrictive.

Here's the stuff connecting them that I could find:

Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systematic approach.

"Additional diagnoses accounting for persistent symptoms included: pancreatic insufficiency, irritable bowel syndrome, bacterial overgrowth, lymphocytic colitis, collagenous colitis, ulcerative jejunitis, T-cell lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, fructose intolerance, protein losing enteropathy, cavitating lymphadenopathy syndrome, and tropical sprue."

(Open Original Shared Link)

The prevalence and causes of chronic diarrhea in patients with celiac sprue treated with a gluten-free diet.

"The causes of diarrhea in 11 patients consenting to this study were microscopic colitis, steatorrhea secondary to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, dietary lactose or fructose malabsorption, anal sphincter dysfunction causing fecal incontinence, and the irritable bowel syndrome."

via Open Original Shared Link

Celiac (NIH "Gene Review")

"Consultation with an expert dietician to analyze the diet for hidden sources of gluten and to evaluate for lactose or fructose intolerance, which can contribute to poor clinical response to a gluten-free diet...•Assessment for lactose or fructose intolerance is important because these conditions can be responsible for lack of response to the gluten-free diet [Green & Jabri 2003]."

Open Original Shared Link

The Green & Jabri reference is here, but the abstract doesn't help: 30.Green PH, Jabri B. Coeliac disease. Lancet. 2003;362:383–91. [PubMed: 12907013] (Open Original Shared Link)

And two interesting studies (one just a case study) on cooexisting celiac and hereditary fructose intolerance. Yikes! I had thought this was too crazy a hypothesis to be really that likely for me, but it's apparently within the realm of possibilities:

Non responsive celiac disease due to coexisting hereditary fructose intolerance

"An association between these two distinct genetic gastrointestinal disorders is important as treatment failure of celiac disease calls for careful evaluation for hereditary fructose intolerance"

(Open Original Shared Link)

And from the flip side --

Hereditary fructose intolerance and celiac disease: a novel genetic association

"The possibility of an association between these 2 gastrointestinal disorders is important, particularly in the management of HFI patients with persisting symptoms."

(Open Original Shared Link)

Anyone have better research on this than I could find?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,265
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Planter
    Newest Member
    Planter
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Thanks so much for the useful information. What do you mean by invasive, expensive procedure that has some medical risks attached to it, what risks? It appears to be like colonoscopy just other end but never had one so curious in case I need one what to expect thanks
    • trents
      The other thing to understand is that if the blood antibody testing is negative, it is most likely that the endoscopy/biopsy will also be negative. The blood tests are checking for antibodies from the damage caused by celiac inflammation. The biopsy is checking optically for the same damage. If there are no antibodies being produced then there is no damage happening. In either case, a gluten challenge would be necessary.
    • trents
      Technically speaking, the blood test is not required before the endoscopy/biopsy but you may have a hard time finding a physician willing to do an endoscopy/biopsy without it having been preceded by positive celiac blood antibody test scores. Positive antibody test scores provide the justification for going forward with an invasive, expensive procedure that has some medical risks attached to it, especially since the gluten free diet is the antidote for both celiac disease and NCGS. We sometimes do see endoscopies/biopsies to check for celiac disease without positive biopsies but only when there is obvious failure to thrive for no other apparent reason and the patient has deteriorated to the point where it has become life threatening. We also see it sometimes done incidentally when checking for other GI-related medical problems. In your case, there is no obvious reason to suspect celiac disease as opposed to NCGS as all your general lab work values are fine. You just have some GI distress associated with gluten. There is no evidence at this point to suggest that you are suffering from malabsorption. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease.
    • trents
      @LeeRoy83, what RMJ is referring to is the test for IGA deficiency, often called "total IGA". It is not a celiac diagnostic test per se. However, if this test score is low (i.e., you are IGA deficient), the celiac IGA test scores cannot be trusted as they will be artificially low which may include false negatives. Possibly, RMJ is correct. But I'm looking at the list of terminologies employed for the various tests as laid out in this article:  For the IGA deficiency test, here is the list: Other Names for the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Test Total IgA Test Serum IgA Test IgA Serum Levels Test IgA Blood Test IgA Quantitative Test IgA Antibody Test IgA Immunodeficiency Test None of those match very well with the test score you posted which is the "Tissu (Sic) transglutaminase IgA" which lends itself to the acronym, TTG-IGA.
    • Scott Adams
      In general, and I've visited many boutique cheese manufacturing facilities here in Sonoma County, CA, there is no wheat anywhere near them. Dairies generally don't process wheat products, and in cheese making cleanliness is next to godliness--they tend to keep things very clean to the point of sterile so their cheeses won't get contaminated with bacteria that might ruin them.
×
×
  • Create New...