Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Sugar Substitute?


Wenmin

Recommended Posts

Wenmin Enthusiast

I am battling with pre-diabetes right now and would like to know what gluten free sugar substitute is best to use. I realize the holidays are right around the corner and would like to be prepared when the time comes to start baking. I do remember early in my diagnosis, trying a sugar sub at my mom's house and felt really bad after. Not real sure if it was the sugar substitute or something else that got me. I have access to many different kinds of substitutes, but not real sure which ones are gluten free. Please help!

Wenmin


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Juliebove Rising Star

I am battling with pre-diabetes right now and would like to know what gluten free sugar substitute is best to use. I realize the holidays are right around the corner and would like to be prepared when the time comes to start baking. I do remember early in my diagnosis, trying a sugar sub at my mom's house and felt really bad after. Not real sure if it was the sugar substitute or something else that got me. I have access to many different kinds of substitutes, but not real sure which ones are gluten free. Please help!

Wenmin

First off I don't know of any sugar substitutes that contain gluten. Yes there is glucose syrup that is sometimes made of wheat. But you wouldn't be using that if you are trying to cut the carbs.

Do beware of sugar alcohols such as mannitol, maltitol, sorbitol, xylitol, pretty much anything ending in "ol". They can have a laxative effect.

Also realize that a sugar substitute is going to alter the end ingredient. Splenda is the one generally used for baking because it can take high heat. But the best results would be a mix of 1/2 Splenda and 1/2 sugar. But if you're going to do that you are only slightly cutting back on the carbs. For most baked goods the flour you use is going to add so many carbs it may not be doable for you. Cheesecake is one thing I've been told does well with a sugar substitute and you can make it crustless or use a nut crust.

I have tried several times to make sugar free cranberry sauce. I just didn't like it. It came out as a strange pinkish color and didn't taste anything like the canned stuff I am used to.

I have diabetes. I don't eat a lot of sweets. I don't really like most of them. But if I am going to eat them, I just have one bite or a very small amount of the real thing. That to me is better than a whole serving of something made with a sugar substitute that just isn't good tasting.

My daughter has essentially what is pre-diabetes even though the Dr. didn't call it that. She has mostly given up sweets. She did get a couple of pre-made gluten-free cheesecakes that are a single serving. If she wants one of those she will cut back elsewhere in the meal on carbs. Or she will eat one as a snack before dance when she is going to be active and burn the carbs off. She will also eat candy by portioning out in very small amounts. Such as 10 Skittles per day.

RiceGuy Collaborator

I can only recommend Stevia, as it is completely natural, zero carbs, zero sugars, zero calories, and zero on the glycemic index. However, this would apply to only the pure extract. The Stevita brand has a pure extract called Simply-Stevia, which I use exclusively. This product has the highest purity of any Stevia extract I am aware of. It can take high heat, so it is good for cooking and baking.

However, because it is so intensely sweet, you must know how to use it, or you'll likely not get the kind of results you're hoping for. I do not have a sweet tooth, and I find that less than half a teaspoon is sweet enough for a recipe which traditionally would have about a cup of sugar. What this means is that you'll have to adjust the recipe to account for the reduced bulk. I don't find this to be a problem, but then I cook and bake entirely from scratch. I'm also not super-picky about the results, as long as it isn't distasteful, which rarely happens.

An example of how one might use Stevia in baking for the holidays would be pumpkin pie. What to use to make up the missing bulk? Well, it's pumpkin pie, ain't it? So why not extra pumpkin? You can also get creative and add some not-so-traditional ingredients. I find lots of things go well with pumpkin.

Another example is apple pie, and this is quite a bit easier since there isn't usually much added sugar to bulk up a traditional apple pie anyway. Depending on the variety of apple you use, you may find it only takes 1/4 tsp or less of Stevia to sweeten the entire pie.

Lastly, I find that a pinch of salt can go a long way in helping the taste when using Stevia as the only sweetener in a recipe. I'm not sure why this is, but I know many traditional sweet recipes have a little salt anyway, so perhaps it's nothing out of the ordinary. I just don't usually add salt unless I find it needs it.

The only sugar which I know is generally safer than sucrose (regular table sugar) for diabetics is fructose, but then that carries its own possible implications, especially if you use it often, or in high amounts. Not something I'd recommend using to any great degree, but since fructose is the primary sugar in most fruits, it cannot be pure evil. Though fresh fruits as found in nature tend to be better balanced in terms of nutrition than confectionery or a purified sugar product. Many fruits have fiber too, which I understand can slow the absorption of sugars, thus reduce the possible blood sugar spike. Agave is said to be relatively low glycemic, since it is primarily fructose. Granulated fructose is also available. But again, I do not recommend using fructose like the typical American uses sugar. That'll surely have health implications.

Jestgar Rising Star

This may sound odd, but this tea tastes very sweet to me:

Open Original Shared Link

and I've considered trying to use it in baked goods to see if it adds sweetness without the sugar.

Wenmin Enthusiast

Thanks for all ya'll help.

Wenmin

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,914
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Anmnewlin1
    Newest Member
    Anmnewlin1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
    • Jack Common
      My old results (almost a year ago) are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   I didn't have any symptoms now except tiredness but I think it's just work. I'm not IgA deficient as you can see so I don't need to do this Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG test. But I do because it's sometimes not in the normal range. What do you think this time? I think I don't have celiac disease. But this test... 
    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
×
×
  • Create New...