-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
-
Get Celiac.com Updates:Support Our Content
Leaderboard
-
January 17 2013
1 reputation point
January 16 2013
4 reputation points
1 reputation point
1 reputation point
January 15 2013
1 reputation point
1 reputation point
1 reputation point
January 14 2013
4 reputation points
2 reputation points
1 reputation point
January 13 2013
3 reputation points
2 reputation points
2 reputation points
January 12 2013
2 reputation points
2 reputation points
1 reputation point
January 11 2013
2 reputation points
2 reputation points
1 reputation point
January 10 2013
3 reputation points
2 reputation points
-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
-
Member Statistics
-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics121.1k
-
Total Posts70.6k
-
-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
-
Who's Online (See full list)
-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
-
Upcoming Events
-
Posts
-
My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
-
Thank you for direction. Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
-
-
Thank you for the update. So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy. Glad you know where you stand. As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
-
-
