Cindy987
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Cindy987's Achievements
-
Again, most of these responses do not properly address the GFWD article at all. Appeals to emotion have no place in scientific pursuit of truth. GFWD had zero personal attacks and zero fear mongering- unlike what I see here. It is obvious that the intent is to continue to make irrational and emotional appeals along with misrepresentations of what was written...
-
I think she sows a better understanding of the complexity in testing, for those who take the time. I did not see that in your article.
-
I will note you only quote Fagan, not Tricia from GFWD. This descends to rumor mongering.
-
Did you read the response from GFWD? It seems not.
-
I just read the write-up by Gluten Free Watch Dog. You should consider a retraction and get things straightened out. GFWD is highly respected and soundly grounded in science. *This article* is hype and does not serve the Celiac community well.